PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FAD vs. FDL
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FAD vs. FDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Multi Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FAD) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FAD vs. FDL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FAD
First Trust Multi Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund
-1.80%17.23%23.85%19.07%-24.06%21.17%34.92%26.66%-6.45%25.75%
FDL
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund
15.49%14.79%17.98%2.94%6.66%26.10%-4.30%24.41%-5.99%12.02%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FAD achieves a -1.80% return, which is significantly lower than FDL's 15.49% return. Over the past 10 years, FAD has outperformed FDL with an annualized return of 12.73%, while FDL has yielded a comparatively lower 11.60% annualized return.


FAD

1D
3.83%
1M
-5.64%
YTD
-1.80%
6M
-0.99%
1Y
22.98%
3Y*
17.93%
5Y*
8.03%
10Y*
12.73%

FDL

1D
0.43%
1M
0.01%
YTD
15.49%
6M
19.42%
1Y
21.84%
3Y*
18.00%
5Y*
14.12%
10Y*
11.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FAD vs. FDL - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAD has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than FDL's 0.45% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FAD vs. FDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FAD
FAD Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
FAD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAD Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
FAD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAD Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

FDL
FDL Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
FDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDL Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
FDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDL Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FAD vs. FDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Multi Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FAD) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FADFDLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.05

1.47

-0.42

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.55

2.06

-0.51

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.29

-0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.78

1.96

-0.18

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.13

7.63

-0.50

FAD vs. FDL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAD Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is comparable to the FDL Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAD and FDL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FADFDLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.05

1.47

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

0.99

-0.60

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

0.68

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.46

0.00

Correlation

The correlation between FAD and FDL is 0.58, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

FAD vs. FDL - Dividend Comparison

FAD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, less than FDL's 3.61% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FAD
First Trust Multi Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund
0.11%0.09%0.59%0.51%0.60%0.09%0.32%0.48%0.20%0.22%0.64%0.41%
FDL
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund
3.61%4.04%4.96%4.58%3.58%4.59%4.48%3.75%3.97%3.18%2.93%3.65%

Drawdowns

FAD vs. FDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAD drawdown since its inception was -54.33%, smaller than the maximum FDL drawdown of -65.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAD and FDL.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FADFDLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.33%

-65.93%

+11.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.08%

-11.58%

-1.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.99%

-16.46%

-15.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.25%

-41.40%

+4.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.24%

-0.10%

-7.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.72%

-9.73%

+0.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.26%

3.10%

+0.16%

Volatility

FAD vs. FDL - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Multi Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FAD) has a higher volatility of 7.87% compared to First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL) at 2.56%. This indicates that FAD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FADFDLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.87%

2.56%

+5.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.67%

8.16%

+6.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.90%

14.96%

+6.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.50%

14.31%

+6.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.07%

17.09%

+3.98%