FACDX vs. VGT
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class A (FACDX) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT).
FACDX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Sep 3, 1996. VGT is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the MSCI US Investable Market Information Technology 25/50 Index. It was launched on Mar 25, 2004.
Performance
FACDX vs. VGT - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FACDX vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FACDX Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class A | -9.65% | 14.19% | 3.97% | 3.81% | -13.07% | 11.25% | 21.07% | 27.89% | 7.20% | 24.09% |
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | -7.34% | 21.77% | 29.30% | 52.66% | -29.70% | 30.45% | 46.04% | 48.62% | 2.46% | 37.08% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FACDX achieves a -9.65% return, which is significantly lower than VGT's -7.34% return. Over the past 10 years, FACDX has underperformed VGT with an annualized return of 8.31%, while VGT has yielded a comparatively higher 21.35% annualized return.
FACDX
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- -9.52%
- YTD
- -9.65%
- 6M
- 0.11%
- 1Y
- 4.26%
- 3Y*
- 3.47%
- 5Y*
- 1.21%
- 10Y*
- 8.31%
VGT
- 1D
- 4.34%
- 1M
- -3.89%
- YTD
- -7.34%
- 6M
- -6.36%
- 1Y
- 29.19%
- 3Y*
- 22.58%
- 5Y*
- 14.54%
- 10Y*
- 21.35%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FACDX vs. VGT - Expense Ratio Comparison
FACDX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than VGT's 0.09% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FACDX vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank
FACDX
VGT
FACDX vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class A (FACDX) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FACDX | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.21 | 1.08 | -0.87 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.42 | 1.65 | -1.23 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.23 | -0.18 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.21 | 1.77 | -1.56 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.63 | 5.47 | -4.85 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FACDX | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 | 1.08 | -0.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 | 0.58 | -0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 | 0.88 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.61 | -0.05 |
Correlation
The correlation between FACDX and VGT is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
FACDX vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison
FACDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.70%, more than VGT's 0.44% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FACDX Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class A | 14.70% | 13.28% | 12.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 6.24% | 5.94% | 0.32% | 5.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 6.66% |
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 0.44% | 0.40% | 0.60% | 0.65% | 0.91% | 0.64% | 0.82% | 1.11% | 1.29% | 0.99% | 1.31% | 1.28% |
Drawdowns
FACDX vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FACDX drawdown since its inception was -44.55%, smaller than the maximum VGT drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FACDX and VGT.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FACDX | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.55% | -54.63% | +10.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.43% | -16.40% | +2.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.35% | -35.07% | +5.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.35% | -35.07% | +5.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.43% | -12.77% | -0.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.36% | -8.00% | -1.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.42% | 5.30% | -0.88% |
Volatility
FACDX vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class A (FACDX) is 5.59%, while Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) has a volatility of 7.99%. This indicates that FACDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FACDX | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.59% | 7.99% | -2.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.00% | 16.31% | -5.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.38% | 27.24% | -8.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.68% | 25.07% | -7.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.75% | 24.48% | -5.73% |