PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FACDX vs. VGT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FACDX vs. VGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class A (FACDX) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FACDX achieves a -5.18% return, which is significantly lower than VGT's 31.64% return. Over the past 10 years, FACDX has underperformed VGT with an annualized return of 8.13%, while VGT has yielded a comparatively higher 25.78% annualized return.


FACDX

1D
-1.81%
1M
-1.06%
YTD
-5.18%
6M
-6.28%
1Y
14.19%
3Y*
4.31%
5Y*
1.75%
10Y*
8.13%

VGT

1D
-1.48%
1M
18.07%
YTD
31.64%
6M
30.51%
1Y
60.15%
3Y*
33.48%
5Y*
22.23%
10Y*
25.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FACDX vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FACDX
Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class A
-5.18%14.19%3.97%3.81%-13.07%11.25%21.07%27.89%7.20%24.09%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
31.64%21.77%29.30%52.66%-29.70%30.45%46.04%48.62%2.46%37.08%

Correlation

The correlation between FACDX and VGT is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2004

0.66

Over the past year, the correlation between FACDX and VGT has dropped to 0.34 - well below their long-term average of 0.66, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FACDX vs. VGT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FACDX
VGT

Healthcare

100.0%
0.0%

Basic Materials

-

0.0%

Communication Services

-

0.5%

Consumer Cyclical

-

0.1%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

0.3%

Financial Services

-

0.5%

Industrials

-

0.4%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

98.5%

Utilities

-

-

Healthcare

FACDX
100.0%
VGT
0.0%

Basic Materials

FACDX

-

VGT
0.0%

Communication Services

FACDX

-

VGT
0.5%

Consumer Cyclical

FACDX

-

VGT
0.1%

Consumer Defensive

FACDX

-

VGT

-

Energy

FACDX

-

VGT
0.3%

Financial Services

FACDX

-

VGT
0.5%

Industrials

FACDX

-

VGT
0.4%

Real Estate

FACDX

-

VGT

-

Technology

FACDX

-

VGT
98.5%

Utilities

FACDX

-

VGT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FACDX vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FACDX
FACDX Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
FACDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FACDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
FACDX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
FACDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
FACDX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

VGT
VGT Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
VGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGT Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
VGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGT Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FACDX vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class A (FACDX) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FACDXVGTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.47

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.09

3.69

-2.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.96

11.77

-8.81

FACDX vs. VGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FACDX Sharpe Ratio is 0.92, which is lower than the VGT Sharpe Ratio of 2.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FACDX and VGT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FACDXVGTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

2.95

-2.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

0.89

-0.79

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

1.05

-0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.68

-0.12

Drawdowns

FACDX vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FACDX drawdown since its inception was -44.55%, smaller than the maximum VGT drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FACDX and VGT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FACDXVGTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.55%

-54.63%

+10.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.43%

-16.40%

+2.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.49%

-27.23%

+9.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.35%

-35.07%

+5.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.35%

-35.07%

+5.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.14%

-1.48%

-7.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.35%

-7.95%

-1.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.93%

5.13%

-0.20%

Volatility

FACDX vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class A (FACDX) is 5.08%, while Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) has a volatility of 6.39%. This indicates that FACDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FACDXVGTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.08%

6.39%

-1.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.11%

16.07%

-3.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.85%

20.57%

-4.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.90%

25.18%

-7.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.78%

24.60%

-5.82%

FACDX vs. VGT - Expense Ratio Comparison

FACDX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than VGT's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

FACDX vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison

FACDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.01%, more than VGT's 0.31% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FACDX
Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class A
14.01%13.28%12.33%0.00%0.00%6.24%5.94%0.32%5.08%0.00%0.00%6.66%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
0.31%0.40%0.60%0.65%0.91%0.64%0.82%1.11%1.29%0.99%1.31%1.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


FACDX and VGT have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VGT has higher volatility (6.39%) compared to FACDX (5.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FACDX dropped -44.55% vs VGT's -54.63%.

VGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.95 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FACDX and VGT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer