PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FACDX vs. FELAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FACDX vs. FELAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class A (FACDX) and Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class A (FELAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FACDX achieves a 10.50% return, which is significantly lower than FELAX's 47.97% return. Over the past 10 years, FACDX has underperformed FELAX with an annualized return of 9.28%, while FELAX has yielded a comparatively higher 33.19% annualized return.


FACDX

1D
-0.02%
1M
-1.26%
6M
10.39%
YTD
10.50%
1Y
32.42%
3Y*
9.64%
5Y*
3.79%
10Y*
9.28%
ALL TIME*
11.15%

FELAX

1D
7.41%
1M
-8.94%
6M
32.48%
YTD
47.97%
1Y
85.05%
3Y*
46.27%
5Y*
35.22%
10Y*
33.19%
ALL TIME*
14.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FACDX vs. FELAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FACDX
Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class A
10.50%14.19%3.97%3.81%-13.07%11.25%21.07%27.89%7.20%24.09%
FELAX
Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class A
47.97%44.88%43.74%75.08%-35.07%57.50%43.57%63.76%-12.76%34.12%

Correlation

The correlation between FACDX and FELAX is 0.23, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.47

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 2000

0.56

Over the past year, the correlation between FACDX and FELAX has dropped to 0.23 - well below their long-term average of 0.56, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FACDX vs. FELAX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FACDX
FELAX

Healthcare

100.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

100.0%

Utilities

-

-

Healthcare

FACDX
100.0%
FELAX

-

Basic Materials

FACDX

-

FELAX

-

Communication Services

FACDX

-

FELAX

-

Consumer Cyclical

FACDX

-

FELAX

-

Consumer Defensive

FACDX

-

FELAX

-

Energy

FACDX

-

FELAX

-

Financial Services

FACDX

-

FELAX

-

Industrials

FACDX

-

FELAX

-

Real Estate

FACDX

-

FELAX

-

Technology

FACDX

-

FELAX
100.0%

Utilities

FACDX

-

FELAX

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FACDX vs. FELAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FACDX
FACDX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
FACDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FACDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
FACDX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
FACDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
FACDX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

FELAX
FELAX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
FELAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FELAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
FELAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
FELAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
FELAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FACDX vs. FELAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class A (FACDX) and Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class A (FELAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FACDXFELAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.31

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.31

2.98

-0.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.06

12.61

-6.55

FACDX vs. FELAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FACDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is comparable to the FELAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FACDX and FELAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FACDX vs. FELAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FACDX drawdown since its inception was -44.55%, smaller than the maximum FELAX drawdown of -71.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FACDX and FELAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FACDXFELAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.55%

-71.33%

+26.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.43%

-26.90%

+13.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.49%

-36.43%

+18.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.35%

-46.15%

+16.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.35%

-46.15%

+16.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.50%

-21.49%

+18.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.32%

-21.81%

+12.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.12%

6.36%

-1.24%

Volatility

FACDX vs. FELAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class A (FACDX) is 5.12%, while Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class A (FELAX) has a volatility of 16.84%. This indicates that FACDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FELAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FACDXFELAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.12%

16.84%

-11.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.45%

34.45%

-21.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.99%

40.70%

-23.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.16%

39.85%

-21.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.82%

35.48%

-16.66%

FACDX vs. FELAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FACDX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than FELAX's 0.94% expense ratio.


Dividends

FACDX vs. FELAX - Dividend Comparison

FACDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.02%, more than FELAX's 4.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FACDX
Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class A
12.02%13.28%12.33%0.00%0.00%6.24%5.94%0.32%5.08%0.00%0.00%6.66%
FELAX
Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class A
4.71%6.96%7.02%3.40%3.32%4.34%4.51%1.00%20.15%9.67%0.36%10.71%

Frequently Asked Questions


FACDX and FELAX have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FELAX has higher volatility (16.84%) compared to FACDX (5.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FACDX dropped -44.55% vs FELAX's -71.33%.

FELAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FACDX and FELAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer