FAB vs. IGLD
FAB (First Trust Multi Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund) and IGLD (FT Cboe Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FAB is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ AlphaDEX Multi Cap Value Index, while IGLD is a Precious Metals fund actively managed by First Trust. FAB is passively managed, while IGLD is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, FAB returned 7.87%/yr vs 13.02%/yr for IGLD. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FAB charges 0.64%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for IGLD.
Performance
FAB vs. IGLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FAB achieves a 10.72% return, which is significantly higher than IGLD's 1.69% return.
FAB
- 1D
- -0.79%
- 1M
- 0.77%
- YTD
- 10.72%
- 6M
- 11.08%
- 1Y
- 26.09%
- 3Y*
- 15.20%
- 5Y*
- 7.87%
- 10Y*
- 10.39%
IGLD
- 1D
- -0.81%
- 1M
- -1.33%
- YTD
- 1.69%
- 6M
- 4.44%
- 1Y
- 24.53%
- 3Y*
- 23.01%
- 5Y*
- 13.02%
- 10Y*
- —
FAB vs. IGLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAB First Trust Multi Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund | 10.72% | 9.86% | 7.82% | 15.81% | -6.79% | 15.68% |
IGLD FT Cboe Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF | 1.69% | 47.46% | 19.36% | 9.24% | -2.34% | 4.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between FAB and IGLD is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 4, 2021 | 0.11 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FAB vs. IGLD — Risk / Return Rank
FAB
IGLD
FAB vs. IGLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Multi Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FAB) and FT Cboe Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF (IGLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FAB | IGLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.91 | 1.06 | +0.85 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.92 | 1.47 | +1.45 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.22 | +0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.94 | 1.40 | +2.54 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.25 | 3.82 | +8.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FAB | IGLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.91 | 1.06 | +0.85 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 | 0.86 | -0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.94 | -0.60 |
Drawdowns
FAB vs. IGLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FAB drawdown since its inception was -63.29%, which is greater than IGLD's maximum drawdown of -18.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAB and IGLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FAB | IGLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.29% | -18.59% | -44.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.65% | -17.56% | +10.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.91% | -17.56% | -5.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.91% | -18.59% | -4.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.08% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.98% | -15.16% | +14.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.25% | -5.24% | -4.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.14% | 6.43% | -4.29% |
Volatility
FAB vs. IGLD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Multi Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FAB) is 3.15%, while FT Cboe Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF (IGLD) has a volatility of 5.12%. This indicates that FAB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IGLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FAB | IGLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.15% | 5.12% | -1.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.64% | 21.01% | -12.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.81% | 23.24% | -9.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.72% | 15.17% | +3.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.06% | 15.00% | +7.06% |
FAB vs. IGLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
FAB has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is lower than IGLD's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
FAB vs. IGLD - Dividend Comparison
FAB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.59%, less than IGLD's 17.92% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAB First Trust Multi Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund | 1.59% | 1.57% | 2.00% | 1.94% | 1.80% | 1.32% | 1.59% | 1.75% | 1.96% | 1.42% | 1.40% | 1.62% |
IGLD FT Cboe Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF | 17.92% | 9.91% | 20.81% | 7.85% | 4.45% | 2.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FAB and IGLD have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IGLD has higher volatility (5.12%) compared to FAB (3.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAB dropped -63.29% vs IGLD's -18.59%.
On 5-year performance, IGLD leads with 13.02% vs 7.87% for FAB. On fees, FAB is cheaper at 0.64% per year. On volatility, FAB has been the lower-risk option at 3.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IGLD has performed better with a 13.02% return vs 7.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FAB is cheaper with a 0.64% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for IGLD.
IGLD has the higher dividend yield at 17.92%, compared with 1.59% for FAB.
FAB is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while IGLD is Precious Metals. Their fees differ too: 0.64% for FAB and 0.85% for IGLD.
FAB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FAB and IGLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer