FAAA vs. AAAC
FAAA (Fidelity AAA CLO ETF) and AAAC (Columbia AAA CLO ETF) are both CLO funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.20% expense ratio.
Performance
FAAA vs. AAAC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FAAA
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 0.54%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AAAC
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.46%
- 6M
- 2.48%
- YTD
- 2.69%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FAAA vs. AAAC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
FAAA Fidelity AAA CLO ETF | 2.17% |
AAAC Columbia AAA CLO ETF | 1.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between FAAA and AAAC is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2026 | 0.25 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FAAA vs. AAAC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity AAA CLO ETF (FAAA) and Columbia AAA CLO ETF (AAAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FAAA vs. AAAC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FAAA drawdown since its inception was -0.55%, roughly equal to the maximum AAAC drawdown of -0.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAAA and AAAC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FAAA | AAAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.55% | -0.55% | 0.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.06% | -0.04% | -0.02% |
Volatility
FAAA vs. AAAC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FAAA | AAAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84% | 0.85% | -0.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.84% | 0.85% | -0.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.84% | 0.85% | -0.01% |
FAAA vs. AAAC - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both FAAA and AAAC have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FAAA vs. AAAC - Dividend Comparison
FAAA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, less than AAAC's 2.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
AAAC Columbia AAA CLO ETF | 2.65% | 0.03% |
FAAA Fidelity AAA CLO ETF | 1.67% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FAAA and AAAC have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FAAA and AAAC have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.
AAAC has the higher dividend yield at 2.65%, compared with 1.67% for FAAA.
They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Columbia Threadneedle.
Find the right allocation for FAAA and AAAC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer