FAAA vs. PAAA

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

FAAA (Fidelity AAA CLO ETF) and PAAA (PGIM AAA CLO ETF) are both CLO funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.26 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. FAAA charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for PAAA.

Performance

FAAA vs. PAAA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity AAA CLO ETF (FAAA) and PGIM AAA CLO ETF (PAAA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

FAAA

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 0.41%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

PAAA

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.33%
• 6M: 2.20%
• YTD: 2.76%
• 1Y: 4.99%
• 3Y*: 6.48%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 6.48%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FAAA Fidelity AAA CLO ETF	$1.93M	$1.67M	$1.54M
PAAA PGIM AAA CLO ETF	$115.54M	$105.02M	$101.96M

FAAA vs. PAAA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
FAAA Fidelity AAA CLO ETF	2.33%
PAAA PGIM AAA CLO ETF	2.12%

Correlation

The correlation between FAAA and PAAA is 0.26, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2026	0.26

Return for Risk

FAAA vs. PAAA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FAAA

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

PAAA

PAAA Risk / Return Rank: 99
PAAA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
PAAA Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
PAAA Omega Ratio Rank: 99
PAAA Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
PAAA Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FAAA vs. PAAA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity AAA CLO ETF (FAAA) and PGIM AAA CLO ETF (PAAA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FAAA	PAAA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	10.73	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	20.88	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	6.51	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	28.82	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	178.72	—

Drawdowns

FAAA vs. PAAA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAAA drawdown since its inception was -0.55%, smaller than the maximum PAAA drawdown of -1.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAAA and PAAA.

Drawdown Indicators

	FAAA	PAAA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.55%	-1.04%	+0.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-0.17%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-1.04%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.05%	-0.02%	-0.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.03%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FAAA	PAAA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.11%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	0.36%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80%	0.47%	+0.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.80%	0.95%	-0.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.80%	0.95%	-0.15%

FAAA vs. PAAA - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAAA has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than PAAA's 0.19% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FAAA vs. PAAA - Dividend Comparison

FAAA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.03%, less than PAAA's 5.23% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
FAAA Fidelity AAA CLO ETF	2.03%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PAAA PGIM AAA CLO ETF	4.80%	5.12%	5.88%	2.76%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FAAA and PAAA in my portfolio?

FAAA and PAAA have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FAAA or PAAA?

On fees, PAAA is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FAAA or PAAA?

PAAA is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for FAAA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FAAA or PAAA?

PAAA has the higher dividend yield at 4.80%, compared with 2.03% for FAAA.

What is the main difference between FAAA and PAAA?

They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for FAAA and 0.19% for PAAA.