EZU vs. VEA
EZU (iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF) and VEA (Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EZU is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI EMU, while VEA is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EZU returned 9.96%/yr vs 10.27%/yr for VEA. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EZU charges 0.51%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VEA.
Performance
EZU vs. VEA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EZU achieves a 8.17% return, which is significantly lower than VEA's 15.96% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with EZU having a 9.96% annualized return and VEA not far ahead at 10.27%.
EZU
- 1D
- 0.73%
- 1M
- 3.97%
- YTD
- 8.17%
- 6M
- 11.21%
- 1Y
- 19.95%
- 3Y*
- 18.60%
- 5Y*
- 9.36%
- 10Y*
- 9.96%
VEA
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- 5.24%
- YTD
- 15.96%
- 6M
- 19.86%
- 1Y
- 32.71%
- 3Y*
- 20.13%
- 5Y*
- 10.01%
- 10Y*
- 10.27%
EZU vs. VEA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EZU iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF | 8.17% | 40.00% | 2.23% | 23.44% | -17.25% | 13.92% | 7.62% | 23.27% | -16.76% | 27.89% |
VEA Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF | 15.96% | 35.16% | 3.15% | 17.93% | -15.34% | 11.66% | 9.71% | 22.62% | -14.75% | 26.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between EZU and VEA is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2007 | 0.94 |
The correlation between EZU and VEA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
EZU vs. VEA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EZU
VEA
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Real Estate
Financial Services
EZU
VEA
Industrials
EZU
VEA
Technology
EZU
VEA
Consumer Cyclical
EZU
VEA
Utilities
EZU
VEA
Healthcare
EZU
VEA
Consumer Defensive
EZU
VEA
Energy
EZU
VEA
Basic Materials
EZU
VEA
Communication Services
EZU
VEA
Real Estate
EZU
VEA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EZU vs. VEA — Risk / Return Rank
EZU
VEA
EZU vs. VEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF (EZU) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EZU | VEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.19 | 2.10 | -0.91 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.75 | 2.89 | -1.15 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.38 | -0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.62 | 2.94 | -1.32 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.88 | 11.50 | -5.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EZU | VEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.19 | 2.10 | -0.91 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | 0.61 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | 0.59 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.21 | 0.25 | -0.04 |
Drawdowns
EZU vs. VEA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EZU drawdown since its inception was -65.32%, which is greater than VEA's maximum drawdown of -60.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EZU and VEA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EZU | VEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.32% | -60.68% | -4.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.06% | -11.63% | -1.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.02% | -13.45% | -1.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.11% | -29.71% | -6.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.37% | -35.73% | -5.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.24% | -13.29% | -5.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.60% | 2.98% | +0.62% |
Volatility
EZU vs. VEA - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF (EZU) has a higher volatility of 6.82% compared to Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) at 5.73%. This indicates that EZU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VEA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EZU | VEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.82% | 5.73% | +1.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.07% | 13.30% | +0.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.89% | 15.66% | +1.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.85% | 16.55% | +3.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.49% | 17.36% | +3.13% |
EZU vs. VEA - Expense Ratio Comparison
EZU has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is higher than VEA's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
EZU vs. VEA - Dividend Comparison
EZU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.64%, more than VEA's 2.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EZU iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF | 2.64% | 2.85% | 2.90% | 2.56% | 2.79% | 2.46% | 2.13% | 2.84% | 3.47% | 1.91% | 3.07% | 2.18% |
VEA Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF | 2.59% | 3.22% | 3.35% | 3.15% | 2.91% | 3.16% | 2.04% | 3.04% | 3.35% | 2.77% | 3.05% | 2.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, EZU and VEA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
EZU has higher volatility (6.82%) compared to VEA (5.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EZU dropped -65.32% vs VEA's -60.68%.
On 10-year performance, VEA leads with 10.27% vs 9.96% for EZU. On fees, VEA is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VEA has been the lower-risk option at 5.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VEA has performed better with a 10.27% return vs 9.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VEA is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.51% for EZU.
EZU has the higher dividend yield at 2.64%, compared with 2.59% for VEA.
EZU is categorized as Europe Equities, while VEA is Foreign Large Cap Equities. EZU tracks MSCI EMU, while VEA tracks FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.51% for EZU and 0.03% for VEA.
VEA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EZU and VEA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer