EZU vs. IEV
EZU (iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF) and IEV (iShares Europe ETF) are both Europe Equities funds from iShares - EZU tracks the MSCI EMU while IEV tracks the S&P Europe 350 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EZU returned 9.96%/yr vs 9.20%/yr for IEV. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EZU charges 0.51%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for IEV.
Performance
EZU vs. IEV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EZU achieves a 8.17% return, which is significantly higher than IEV's 6.72% return. Over the past 10 years, EZU has outperformed IEV with an annualized return of 9.96%, while IEV has yielded a comparatively lower 9.20% annualized return.
EZU
- 1D
- 0.73%
- 1M
- 3.97%
- YTD
- 8.17%
- 6M
- 11.21%
- 1Y
- 19.95%
- 3Y*
- 18.60%
- 5Y*
- 9.36%
- 10Y*
- 9.96%
IEV
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- 2.18%
- YTD
- 6.72%
- 6M
- 10.40%
- 1Y
- 18.07%
- 3Y*
- 16.39%
- 5Y*
- 9.00%
- 10Y*
- 9.20%
EZU vs. IEV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EZU iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF | 8.17% | 40.00% | 2.23% | 23.44% | -17.25% | 13.92% | 7.62% | 23.27% | -16.76% | 27.89% |
IEV iShares Europe ETF | 6.72% | 35.63% | 1.36% | 20.14% | -14.24% | 16.73% | 4.07% | 24.03% | -14.68% | 24.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between EZU and IEV is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2001 | 0.95 |
The correlation between EZU and IEV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
EZU vs. IEV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EZU
IEV
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Real Estate
Financial Services
EZU
IEV
Industrials
EZU
IEV
Technology
EZU
IEV
Consumer Cyclical
EZU
IEV
Utilities
EZU
IEV
Healthcare
EZU
IEV
Consumer Defensive
EZU
IEV
Energy
EZU
IEV
Basic Materials
EZU
IEV
Communication Services
EZU
IEV
Real Estate
EZU
IEV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EZU vs. IEV — Risk / Return Rank
EZU
IEV
EZU vs. IEV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF (EZU) and iShares Europe ETF (IEV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EZU | IEV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.19 | 1.17 | +0.02 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.75 | 1.71 | +0.04 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.21 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.62 | 1.55 | +0.07 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.88 | 5.70 | +0.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EZU | IEV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.19 | 1.17 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | 0.51 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | 0.50 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.21 | 0.24 | -0.03 |
Drawdowns
EZU vs. IEV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EZU drawdown since its inception was -65.32%, roughly equal to the maximum IEV drawdown of -63.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EZU and IEV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EZU | IEV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.32% | -63.27% | -2.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.06% | -12.31% | -0.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.02% | -14.63% | -0.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.11% | -30.60% | -5.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.37% | -36.62% | -4.75% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.53% | +1.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.24% | -15.05% | -4.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.60% | 3.35% | +0.25% |
Volatility
EZU vs. IEV - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF (EZU) has a higher volatility of 6.82% compared to iShares Europe ETF (IEV) at 5.77%. This indicates that EZU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IEV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EZU | IEV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.82% | 5.77% | +1.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.07% | 12.89% | +1.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.89% | 15.58% | +1.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.85% | 17.56% | +2.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.49% | 18.66% | +1.83% |
EZU vs. IEV - Expense Ratio Comparison
EZU has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is lower than IEV's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
EZU vs. IEV - Dividend Comparison
EZU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.64%, more than IEV's 2.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EZU iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF | 2.64% | 2.85% | 2.90% | 2.56% | 2.79% | 2.46% | 2.13% | 2.84% | 3.47% | 1.91% | 3.07% | 2.18% |
IEV iShares Europe ETF | 2.56% | 2.73% | 3.10% | 2.77% | 3.06% | 2.81% | 1.76% | 3.06% | 3.43% | 2.39% | 3.08% | 2.81% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, EZU and IEV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
EZU has higher volatility (6.82%) compared to IEV (5.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EZU dropped -65.32% vs IEV's -63.27%.
On 10-year performance, EZU leads with 9.96% vs 9.20% for IEV. On fees, EZU is cheaper at 0.51% per year. On volatility, IEV has been the lower-risk option at 5.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EZU has performed better with a 9.96% return vs 9.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EZU is cheaper with a 0.51% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for IEV.
EZU has the higher dividend yield at 2.64%, compared with 2.56% for IEV.
EZU tracks MSCI EMU, while IEV tracks S&P Europe 350 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.51% for EZU and 0.59% for IEV.
EZU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.19 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EZU and IEV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer