EZPZ vs. XBCI

Last updated Aug 6, 2026

EZPZ (Franklin Crypto Index ETF) and XBCI (NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. EZPZ is passively managed, while XBCI is actively managed. Their 0.98 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. EZPZ charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.98%/yr for XBCI.

Performance

EZPZ vs. XBCI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Crypto Index ETF (EZPZ) and NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF (XBCI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

EZPZ

• 1D: 0.93%
• 1M: 1.27%
• 6M: -13.59%
• YTD: -28.79%
• 1Y: -45.45%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -26.43%

XBCI

• 1D: 1.01%
• 1M: 3.13%
• 6M: -17.52%
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
EZPZ Franklin Crypto Index ETF	$92.79K	$145.26K	$218.28K
XBCI NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF	$4.13M	$3.39M	$5.19M

EZPZ vs. XBCI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
EZPZ Franklin Crypto Index ETF	-18.72%
XBCI NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF	-20.12%

Correlation

The correlation between EZPZ and XBCI is 0.98 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2026	0.98

Return for Risk

EZPZ vs. XBCI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EZPZ

EZPZ Risk / Return Rank: 2
EZPZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
EZPZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
EZPZ Omega Ratio Rank: 2
EZPZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
EZPZ Martin Ratio Rank: 3

XBCI

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EZPZ vs. XBCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Crypto Index ETF (EZPZ) and NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF (XBCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EZPZ	XBCI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.96	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.40	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.85	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.80	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.21	—	—

Drawdowns

EZPZ vs. XBCI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EZPZ drawdown since its inception was -56.63%, which is greater than XBCI's maximum drawdown of -37.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EZPZ and XBCI.

Drawdown Indicators

	EZPZ	XBCI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.63%	-37.31%	-19.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-56.63%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-51.98%	-28.43%	-23.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-25.36%	-16.13%	-9.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	37.54%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	EZPZ	XBCI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.25%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	35.13%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	47.70%	61.95%	-14.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	46.78%	61.95%	-15.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	46.78%	61.95%	-15.17%

EZPZ vs. XBCI - Expense Ratio Comparison

EZPZ has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than XBCI's 0.98% expense ratio.

Dividends

EZPZ vs. XBCI - Dividend Comparison

EZPZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XBCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 29.17%.

Position	TTM
EZPZ Franklin Crypto Index ETF	0.00%
XBCI NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF	29.17%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EZPZ and XBCI in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.98, EZPZ and XBCI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, EZPZ or XBCI?

On fees, EZPZ is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EZPZ or XBCI?

EZPZ is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for XBCI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EZPZ or XBCI?

XBCI has the higher dividend yield at 29.17%, compared with 0.00% for EZPZ.

What is the main difference between EZPZ and XBCI?

They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Neos. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for EZPZ and 0.98% for XBCI.