EZPZ vs. XBCI

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

EZPZ (Franklin Crypto Index ETF) and XBCI (NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. EZPZ is passively managed, while XBCI is actively managed. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. EZPZ charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.98%/yr for XBCI.

Performance

EZPZ vs. XBCI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Crypto Index ETF (EZPZ) and NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF (XBCI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

EZPZ

• 1D: -6.18%
• 1M: -26.82%
• YTD: -34.43%
• 6M: -36.79%
• 1Y: -42.21%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XBCI

• 1D: -7.92%
• 1M: -34.06%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EZPZ vs. XBCI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
EZPZ Franklin Crypto Index ETF	-23.94%
XBCI NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF	-26.20%

Correlation

The correlation between EZPZ and XBCI is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2026	0.98

Return for Risk

EZPZ vs. XBCI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EZPZ

EZPZ Risk / Return Rank: 2
EZPZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
EZPZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
EZPZ Omega Ratio Rank: 2
EZPZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
EZPZ Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EZPZ vs. XBCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Crypto Index ETF (EZPZ) and NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF (XBCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EZPZ	XBCI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.90	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.25	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.86	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.76	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.37	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EZPZ	XBCI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.90	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.71	-0.88	+0.17

Drawdowns

EZPZ vs. XBCI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EZPZ drawdown since its inception was -55.78%, which is greater than XBCI's maximum drawdown of -34.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EZPZ and XBCI.

Drawdown Indicators

	EZPZ	XBCI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.78%	-34.73%	-21.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-55.78%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-55.78%	-34.73%	-21.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.92%	-8.62%	-13.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	30.82%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	EZPZ	XBCI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.69%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	36.53%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	47.23%	67.97%	-20.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	47.86%	67.97%	-20.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	47.86%	67.97%	-20.11%

EZPZ vs. XBCI - Expense Ratio Comparison

EZPZ has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than XBCI's 0.98% expense ratio.

Dividends

EZPZ vs. XBCI - Dividend Comparison

EZPZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XBCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 23.26%.

Position	TTM
EZPZ Franklin Crypto Index ETF	0.00%
XBCI NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF	23.26%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EZPZ and XBCI in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.98, EZPZ and XBCI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, EZPZ or XBCI?

On fees, EZPZ is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EZPZ or XBCI?

EZPZ is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for XBCI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EZPZ or XBCI?

XBCI has the higher dividend yield at 23.26%, compared with 0.00% for EZPZ.

What is the main difference between EZPZ and XBCI?

They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Neos. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for EZPZ and 0.98% for XBCI.