PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EZPZ vs. RSBY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EZPZ vs. RSBY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Crypto Index ETF (EZPZ) and Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF (RSBY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EZPZ achieves a -34.43% return, which is significantly lower than RSBY's 19.04% return.


EZPZ

1D
-6.18%
1M
-26.82%
YTD
-34.43%
6M
-36.79%
1Y
-42.21%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

RSBY

1D
0.19%
1M
-1.29%
YTD
19.04%
6M
15.93%
1Y
20.17%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EZPZ vs. RSBY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
EZPZ
Franklin Crypto Index ETF
-34.43%-10.23%
RSBY
Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF
19.04%-7.08%

Correlation

The correlation between EZPZ and RSBY is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2025

-0.17

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EZPZ vs. RSBY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EZPZ
EZPZ Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
EZPZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EZPZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
EZPZ Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
EZPZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
EZPZ Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

RSBY
RSBY Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
RSBY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSBY Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSBY Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
RSBY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSBY Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EZPZ vs. RSBY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Crypto Index ETF (EZPZ) and Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF (RSBY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EZPZRSBYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.86

1.30

-0.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.76

2.55

-3.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.37

5.96

-7.33

EZPZ vs. RSBY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EZPZ Sharpe Ratio is -0.90, which is lower than the RSBY Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EZPZ and RSBY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EZPZRSBYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.90

1.72

-2.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.71

-0.19

-0.51

Drawdowns

EZPZ vs. RSBY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EZPZ drawdown since its inception was -55.78%, which is greater than RSBY's maximum drawdown of -23.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EZPZ and RSBY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EZPZRSBYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.78%

-23.32%

-32.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-55.78%

-7.95%

-47.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-55.78%

-6.04%

-49.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.92%

-13.76%

-8.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

30.82%

3.40%

+27.42%

Volatility

EZPZ vs. RSBY - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Crypto Index ETF (EZPZ) has a higher volatility of 10.69% compared to Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF (RSBY) at 1.93%. This indicates that EZPZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSBY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EZPZRSBYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.69%

1.93%

+8.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.53%

8.51%

+28.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

47.23%

11.78%

+35.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

47.86%

13.53%

+34.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

47.86%

13.53%

+34.33%

EZPZ vs. RSBY - Expense Ratio Comparison

EZPZ has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than RSBY's 0.98% expense ratio.


Dividends

EZPZ vs. RSBY - Dividend Comparison

EZPZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RSBY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.74%.


PositionTTM20252024
EZPZ
Franklin Crypto Index ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%
RSBY
Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF
1.74%2.07%2.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


EZPZ and RSBY have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EZPZ has higher volatility (10.69%) compared to RSBY (1.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EZPZ dropped -55.78% vs RSBY's -23.32%.

On 1-year performance, RSBY leads with 20.17% vs -42.21% for EZPZ. On fees, EZPZ is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, RSBY has been the lower-risk option at 1.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, RSBY has performed better with a 20.17% return vs -42.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EZPZ is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for RSBY.

RSBY has the higher dividend yield at 1.74%, compared with 0.00% for EZPZ.

EZPZ is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while RSBY is Multistrategy. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Return Stacked. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for EZPZ and 0.98% for RSBY.

RSBY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs -0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EZPZ and RSBY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer