EZPZ vs. RSBY
EZPZ (Franklin Crypto Index ETF) and RSBY (Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EZPZ is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CF Institutional Digital Asset Index – US-Settlement Price, while RSBY is a Multistrategy fund actively managed by Return Stacked. EZPZ is passively managed, while RSBY is actively managed. Over the past year, EZPZ returned -42.21% vs 20.17% for RSBY. At a correlation of -0.17, they often move in opposite directions. EZPZ charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.98%/yr for RSBY.
Performance
EZPZ vs. RSBY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EZPZ achieves a -34.43% return, which is significantly lower than RSBY's 19.04% return.
EZPZ
- 1D
- -6.18%
- 1M
- -26.82%
- YTD
- -34.43%
- 6M
- -36.79%
- 1Y
- -42.21%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RSBY
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- -1.29%
- YTD
- 19.04%
- 6M
- 15.93%
- 1Y
- 20.17%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EZPZ vs. RSBY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EZPZ Franklin Crypto Index ETF | -34.43% | -10.23% |
RSBY Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF | 19.04% | -7.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between EZPZ and RSBY is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2025 | -0.17 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EZPZ vs. RSBY — Risk / Return Rank
EZPZ
RSBY
EZPZ vs. RSBY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Crypto Index ETF (EZPZ) and Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF (RSBY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EZPZ | RSBY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | 1.30 | -0.44 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.76 | 2.55 | -3.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.37 | 5.96 | -7.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EZPZ | RSBY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.90 | 1.72 | -2.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.71 | -0.19 | -0.51 |
Drawdowns
EZPZ vs. RSBY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EZPZ drawdown since its inception was -55.78%, which is greater than RSBY's maximum drawdown of -23.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EZPZ and RSBY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EZPZ | RSBY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.78% | -23.32% | -32.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -55.78% | -7.95% | -47.83% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -55.78% | -6.04% | -49.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.92% | -13.76% | -8.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 30.82% | 3.40% | +27.42% |
Volatility
EZPZ vs. RSBY - Volatility Comparison
Franklin Crypto Index ETF (EZPZ) has a higher volatility of 10.69% compared to Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF (RSBY) at 1.93%. This indicates that EZPZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSBY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EZPZ | RSBY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.69% | 1.93% | +8.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.53% | 8.51% | +28.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.23% | 11.78% | +35.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 47.86% | 13.53% | +34.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.86% | 13.53% | +34.33% |
EZPZ vs. RSBY - Expense Ratio Comparison
EZPZ has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than RSBY's 0.98% expense ratio.
Dividends
EZPZ vs. RSBY - Dividend Comparison
EZPZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RSBY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.74%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
EZPZ Franklin Crypto Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RSBY Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF | 1.74% | 2.07% | 2.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EZPZ and RSBY have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EZPZ has higher volatility (10.69%) compared to RSBY (1.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EZPZ dropped -55.78% vs RSBY's -23.32%.
On 1-year performance, RSBY leads with 20.17% vs -42.21% for EZPZ. On fees, EZPZ is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, RSBY has been the lower-risk option at 1.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, RSBY has performed better with a 20.17% return vs -42.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EZPZ is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for RSBY.
RSBY has the higher dividend yield at 1.74%, compared with 0.00% for EZPZ.
EZPZ is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while RSBY is Multistrategy. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Return Stacked. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for EZPZ and 0.98% for RSBY.
RSBY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs -0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EZPZ and RSBY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer