EZPZ vs. RBIL
EZPZ (Franklin Crypto Index ETF) and RBIL (F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EZPZ is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CF Institutional Digital Asset Index – US-Settlement Price, while RBIL is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, EZPZ returned -45.45% vs 3.81% for RBIL. Their -0.09 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. EZPZ charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for RBIL.
Performance
EZPZ vs. RBIL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EZPZ achieves a -28.79% return, which is significantly lower than RBIL's 2.61% return.
EZPZ
- 1D
- 0.93%
- 1M
- 1.27%
- 6M
- -13.59%
- YTD
- -28.79%
- 1Y
- -45.45%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -26.43%
RBIL
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 0.18%
- 6M
- 2.25%
- YTD
- 2.61%
- 1Y
- 3.81%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 3.81%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $92.79K | $145.26K | $218.28K | |
| $1.19M | $1.87M | $2.26M |
EZPZ vs. RBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EZPZ Franklin Crypto Index ETF | -28.79% | -6.05% |
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF | 2.61% | 2.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between EZPZ and RBIL is -0.10, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2025 | -0.09 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EZPZ vs. RBIL — Risk / Return Rank
EZPZ
RBIL
EZPZ vs. RBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Crypto Index ETF (EZPZ) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EZPZ | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -7.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.85 | 2.00 | -1.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.80 | 6.80 | -7.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.21 | 27.52 | -28.73 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EZPZ vs. RBIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EZPZ drawdown since its inception was -56.63%, which is greater than RBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EZPZ and RBIL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EZPZ | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.63% | -0.56% | -56.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -56.63% | -0.56% | -56.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -51.98% | -0.22% | -51.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.36% | -0.08% | -25.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 37.54% | 0.14% | +37.40% |
Volatility
EZPZ vs. RBIL - Volatility Comparison
Franklin Crypto Index ETF (EZPZ) has a higher volatility of 8.25% compared to F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL) at 0.28%. This indicates that EZPZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RBIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EZPZ | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.25% | 0.28% | +7.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.13% | 0.89% | +34.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.70% | 0.96% | +46.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.78% | 1.06% | +45.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.78% | 1.06% | +45.72% |
EZPZ vs. RBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
EZPZ has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than RBIL's 0.17% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
EZPZ vs. RBIL - Dividend Comparison
EZPZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RBIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.16%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
EZPZ Franklin Crypto Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF | 4.16% | 3.65% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EZPZ and RBIL have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EZPZ has higher volatility (8.25%) compared to RBIL (0.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EZPZ dropped -56.63% vs RBIL's -0.56%.
On 1-year performance, RBIL leads with 3.81% vs -45.45% for EZPZ. On fees, RBIL is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, RBIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, RBIL has performed better with a 3.81% return vs -45.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RBIL is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for EZPZ.
RBIL has the higher dividend yield at 4.16%, compared with 0.00% for EZPZ.
EZPZ is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while RBIL is Inflation-Protected Bonds. EZPZ tracks CF Institutional Digital Asset Index – US-Settlement Price, while RBIL tracks Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and F/m. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for EZPZ and 0.17% for RBIL.
RBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.98 vs -0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EZPZ and RBIL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer