EZPZ vs. BTRN
EZPZ (Franklin Crypto Index ETF) and BTRN (Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds - EZPZ tracks the CF Institutional Digital Asset Index – US-Settlement Price while BTRN tracks the CoinDesk Bitcoin Trend Indicator Futures Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, EZPZ returned -47.61% vs -25.49% for BTRN. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EZPZ charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BTRN.
Performance
EZPZ vs. BTRN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EZPZ achieves a -29.25% return, which is significantly lower than BTRN's -10.03% return.
EZPZ
- 1D
- -1.14%
- 1M
- -1.65%
- 6M
- -35.74%
- YTD
- -29.25%
- 1Y
- -47.61%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BTRN
- 1D
- -0.56%
- 1M
- -1.01%
- 6M
- -12.18%
- YTD
- -10.03%
- 1Y
- -25.49%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EZPZ vs. BTRN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EZPZ Franklin Crypto Index ETF | -29.25% | -10.11% |
BTRN Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF | -10.03% | 2.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between EZPZ and BTRN is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2025 | 0.66 |
The correlation between EZPZ and BTRN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EZPZ vs. BTRN — Risk / Return Rank
EZPZ
BTRN
EZPZ vs. BTRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Crypto Index ETF (EZPZ) and Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF (BTRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EZPZ | BTRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.83 | 0.72 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.84 | -0.98 | +0.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.34 | -1.54 | +0.19 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EZPZ vs. BTRN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EZPZ drawdown since its inception was -56.63%, which is greater than BTRN's maximum drawdown of -36.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EZPZ and BTRN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EZPZ | BTRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.63% | -36.97% | -19.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -56.63% | -26.03% | -30.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -52.29% | -25.90% | -26.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.29% | -14.96% | -9.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 35.47% | 16.63% | +18.84% |
Volatility
EZPZ vs. BTRN - Volatility Comparison
Franklin Crypto Index ETF (EZPZ) has a higher volatility of 11.22% compared to Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF (BTRN) at 2.11%. This indicates that EZPZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BTRN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EZPZ | BTRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.22% | 2.11% | +9.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.15% | 10.16% | +26.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.80% | 17.32% | +30.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 47.47% | 30.21% | +17.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.47% | 30.21% | +17.26% |
EZPZ vs. BTRN - Expense Ratio Comparison
EZPZ has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than BTRN's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
EZPZ vs. BTRN - Dividend Comparison
EZPZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BTRN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 31.20%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BTRN Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF | 31.20% | 27.76% | 2.56% |
EZPZ Franklin Crypto Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EZPZ and BTRN have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EZPZ has higher volatility (11.22%) compared to BTRN (2.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EZPZ dropped -56.63% vs BTRN's -36.97%.
On 1-year performance, BTRN leads with -25.49% vs -47.61% for EZPZ. On fees, EZPZ is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, BTRN has been the lower-risk option at 2.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BTRN has performed better with a -25.49% return vs -47.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EZPZ is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BTRN.
BTRN has the higher dividend yield at 31.20%, compared with 0.00% for EZPZ.
EZPZ tracks CF Institutional Digital Asset Index – US-Settlement Price, while BTRN tracks CoinDesk Bitcoin Trend Indicator Futures Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for EZPZ and 0.95% for BTRN.
EZPZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-1.00 vs -1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EZPZ and BTRN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer