EZPZ vs. BTRN
EZPZ (Franklin Crypto Index ETF) and BTRN (Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds - EZPZ tracks the CF Institutional Digital Asset Index – US-Settlement Price while BTRN tracks the CoinDesk Bitcoin Trend Indicator Futures Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, EZPZ returned -42.21% vs -15.44% for BTRN. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EZPZ charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BTRN.
Performance
EZPZ vs. BTRN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EZPZ achieves a -34.43% return, which is significantly lower than BTRN's -9.29% return.
EZPZ
- 1D
- -6.18%
- 1M
- -26.82%
- YTD
- -34.43%
- 6M
- -36.79%
- 1Y
- -42.21%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BTRN
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- -13.45%
- YTD
- -9.29%
- 6M
- -9.98%
- 1Y
- -15.44%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EZPZ vs. BTRN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EZPZ Franklin Crypto Index ETF | -34.43% | -10.23% |
BTRN Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF | -9.29% | 2.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between EZPZ and BTRN is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2025 | 0.68 |
The correlation between EZPZ and BTRN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EZPZ vs. BTRN — Risk / Return Rank
EZPZ
BTRN
EZPZ vs. BTRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Crypto Index ETF (EZPZ) and Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF (BTRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EZPZ | BTRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | 0.86 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.76 | -0.61 | -0.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.37 | -1.04 | -0.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EZPZ | BTRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.90 | -0.79 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.71 | 0.00 | -0.71 |
Drawdowns
EZPZ vs. BTRN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EZPZ drawdown since its inception was -55.78%, which is greater than BTRN's maximum drawdown of -36.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EZPZ and BTRN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EZPZ | BTRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.78% | -36.97% | -18.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -55.78% | -25.29% | -30.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -55.78% | -25.29% | -30.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.92% | -14.45% | -7.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 30.82% | 14.85% | +15.97% |
Volatility
EZPZ vs. BTRN - Volatility Comparison
Franklin Crypto Index ETF (EZPZ) has a higher volatility of 10.69% compared to Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF (BTRN) at 6.94%. This indicates that EZPZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BTRN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EZPZ | BTRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.69% | 6.94% | +3.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.53% | 10.35% | +26.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.23% | 19.81% | +27.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 47.86% | 30.91% | +16.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.86% | 30.91% | +16.95% |
EZPZ vs. BTRN - Expense Ratio Comparison
EZPZ has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than BTRN's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
EZPZ vs. BTRN - Dividend Comparison
EZPZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BTRN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 30.60%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BTRN Global X Bitcoin Trend Strategy ETF | 30.60% | 27.76% | 2.56% |
EZPZ Franklin Crypto Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EZPZ and BTRN have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EZPZ has higher volatility (10.69%) compared to BTRN (6.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EZPZ dropped -55.78% vs BTRN's -36.97%.
On 1-year performance, BTRN leads with -15.44% vs -42.21% for EZPZ. On fees, EZPZ is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, BTRN has been the lower-risk option at 6.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BTRN has performed better with a -15.44% return vs -42.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EZPZ is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BTRN.
BTRN has the higher dividend yield at 30.60%, compared with 0.00% for EZPZ.
EZPZ tracks CF Institutional Digital Asset Index – US-Settlement Price, while BTRN tracks CoinDesk Bitcoin Trend Indicator Futures Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for EZPZ and 0.95% for BTRN.
BTRN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.79 vs -0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EZPZ and BTRN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer