EZPZ vs. BITU

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

EZPZ (Franklin Crypto Index ETF) and BITU (Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds - EZPZ tracks the CF Institutional Digital Asset Index – US-Settlement Price while BITU tracks the Bloomberg Bitcoin Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, EZPZ returned -45.61% vs -78.69% for BITU. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. EZPZ charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BITU.

Performance

EZPZ vs. BITU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Crypto Index ETF (EZPZ) and Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EZPZ achieves a -35.48% return, which is significantly higher than BITU's -62.35% return.

EZPZ

• 1D: -0.75%
• 1M: -22.22%
• YTD: -35.48%
• 6M: -35.51%
• 1Y: -45.61%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BITU

• 1D: -2.36%
• 1M: -41.19%
• YTD: -62.35%
• 6M: -62.22%
• 1Y: -78.69%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EZPZ vs. BITU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
EZPZ Franklin Crypto Index ETF	-35.48%	-10.11%
BITU Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF	-62.35%	-37.90%

Correlation

The correlation between EZPZ and BITU is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.99
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2025	0.99

The correlation between EZPZ and BITU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

EZPZ vs. BITU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EZPZ

EZPZ Risk / Return Rank: 2
EZPZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
EZPZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
EZPZ Omega Ratio Rank: 3
EZPZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
EZPZ Martin Ratio Rank: 2

BITU

BITU Risk / Return Rank: 1
BITU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
BITU Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
BITU Omega Ratio Rank: 1
BITU Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
BITU Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EZPZ vs. BITU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Crypto Index ETF (EZPZ) and Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EZPZ	BITU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.96	-0.89	-0.06
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.41	-1.74	+0.33
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.84	0.81	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.81	-0.95	+0.14
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.38	-1.47	+0.09

EZPZ vs. BITU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EZPZ Sharpe Ratio is -0.96, which is comparable to the BITU Sharpe Ratio of -0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EZPZ and BITU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EZPZ vs. BITU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EZPZ drawdown since its inception was -56.49%, smaller than the maximum BITU drawdown of -83.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EZPZ and BITU.

Drawdown Indicators

	EZPZ	BITU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.49%	-83.16%	+26.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-56.49%	-83.16%	+26.67%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-56.49%	-83.16%	+26.67%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.07%	-35.67%	+12.60%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	33.13%	53.56%	-20.43%

Volatility

EZPZ vs. BITU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin Crypto Index ETF (EZPZ) is 14.51%, while Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU) has a volatility of 26.62%. This indicates that EZPZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BITU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EZPZ	BITU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.51%	26.62%	-12.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	37.07%	69.77%	-32.70%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	47.79%	88.34%	-40.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	47.86%	97.36%	-49.50%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	47.86%	97.36%	-49.50%

EZPZ vs. BITU - Expense Ratio Comparison

EZPZ has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than BITU's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

EZPZ vs. BITU - Dividend Comparison

EZPZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BITU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 104.24%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
BITU Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF	104.24%	50.23%	0.12%
EZPZ Franklin Crypto Index ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EZPZ and BITU in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.99, EZPZ and BITU move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, EZPZ or BITU?

BITU has higher volatility (26.62%) compared to EZPZ (14.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EZPZ dropped -56.49% vs BITU's -83.16%.

Which ETF is better, EZPZ or BITU?

On 1-year performance, EZPZ leads with -45.61% vs -78.69% for BITU. On fees, EZPZ is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, EZPZ has been the lower-risk option at 14.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EZPZ or BITU?

Over the 1-year period, EZPZ has performed better with a -45.61% return vs -78.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EZPZ or BITU?

EZPZ is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BITU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EZPZ or BITU?

BITU has the higher dividend yield at 104.24%, compared with 0.00% for EZPZ.

What is the main difference between EZPZ and BITU?

EZPZ tracks CF Institutional Digital Asset Index – US-Settlement Price, while BITU tracks Bloomberg Bitcoin Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for EZPZ and 0.95% for BITU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BITU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.89 vs -0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.