PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EZPW vs. RNMBY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

EZPW vs. RNMBY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in EZCORP, Inc. (EZPW) and Rheinmetall AG ADR (RNMBY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EZPW achieves a 60.92% return, which is significantly higher than RNMBY's -23.17% return. Over the past 10 years, EZPW has underperformed RNMBY with an annualized return of 17.29%, while RNMBY has yielded a comparatively higher 38.75% annualized return.


EZPW

1D
1.63%
1M
-5.27%
YTD
60.92%
6M
48.95%
1Y
133.04%
3Y*
53.03%
5Y*
34.31%
10Y*
17.29%

RNMBY

1D
-2.52%
1M
7.27%
YTD
-23.17%
6M
-26.34%
1Y
-30.47%
3Y*
74.63%
5Y*
70.20%
10Y*
38.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EZPW vs. RNMBY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EZPW
EZCORP, Inc.
60.92%58.92%39.82%7.24%10.58%53.86%-29.77%-11.77%-36.64%14.55%
RNMBY
Rheinmetall AG ADR
-23.17%190.28%99.83%63.35%122.00%-13.84%-2.03%28.14%-29.38%98.17%

Correlation

The correlation between EZPW and RNMBY is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2012

0.12

Fundamentals

Market Cap

EZPW:

$2.61B

RNMBY:

$64.85B

EPS

EZPW:

$1.76

RNMBY:

€3.56

PE Ratio

EZPW:

17.74

RNMBY:

67.40

PEG Ratio

EZPW:

0.12

RNMBY:

3.08

PS Ratio

EZPW:

1.76

RNMBY:

5.07

PB Ratio

EZPW:

2.33

RNMBY:

10.50

Total Revenue (TTM)

EZPW:

$1.48B

RNMBY:

€9.58B

Gross Profit (TTM)

EZPW:

$865.21M

RNMBY:

€4.12B

EBITDA (TTM)

EZPW:

$256.16M

RNMBY:

€1.81B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EZPW vs. RNMBY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EZPW
EZPW Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
EZPW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EZPW Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
EZPW Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
EZPW Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
EZPW Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

RNMBY
RNMBY Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
RNMBY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RNMBY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
RNMBY Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
RNMBY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
RNMBY Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EZPW vs. RNMBY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EZCORP, Inc. (EZPW) and Rheinmetall AG ADR (RNMBY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EZPWRNMBYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+4.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+5.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.58

0.91

+0.67

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

8.27

-0.69

+8.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

31.38

-1.50

+32.88

EZPW vs. RNMBY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EZPW Sharpe Ratio is 3.82, which is higher than the RNMBY Sharpe Ratio of -0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EZPW and RNMBY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EZPW vs. RNMBY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EZPW drawdown since its inception was -97.28%, which is greater than RNMBY's maximum drawdown of -67.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EZPW and RNMBY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EZPWRNMBYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.28%

-67.75%

-29.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.19%

-44.06%

+27.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.51%

-44.06%

+23.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.94%

-44.06%

+8.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-76.59%

-67.75%

-8.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.91%

-40.00%

+22.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-59.10%

-16.73%

-42.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.26%

20.36%

-16.10%

Volatility

EZPW vs. RNMBY - Volatility Comparison

EZCORP, Inc. (EZPW) has a higher volatility of 15.70% compared to Rheinmetall AG ADR (RNMBY) at 12.05%. This indicates that EZPW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RNMBY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EZPWRNMBYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.70%

12.05%

+3.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.43%

33.85%

-6.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.11%

45.65%

-10.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.25%

44.78%

-10.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.36%

41.51%

-2.15%

Dividends

EZPW vs. RNMBY - Dividend Comparison

EZPW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RNMBY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EZPW
EZCORP, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RNMBY
Rheinmetall AG ADR
0.98%0.49%0.96%1.46%1.82%1.72%1.56%1.36%1.47%2.06%2.97%0.53%

Financials

EZPW vs. RNMBY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between EZCORP, Inc. and Rheinmetall AG ADR. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B3.50B20222023202420252026
446.88M
1.97B
(EZPW) Total Revenue
(RNMBY) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. EZPW values in USD, RNMBY values in EUR

EZPW vs. RNMBY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between EZCORP, Inc. and Rheinmetall AG ADR over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
58.2%
21.9%
Portfolio components
EZPW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EZCORP, Inc. reported a gross profit of 260.04M and revenue of 446.88M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 58.2%.

RNMBY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rheinmetall AG ADR reported a gross profit of 430.97M and revenue of 1.97B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.9%.

EZPW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EZCORP, Inc. reported an operating income of 67.84M and revenue of 446.88M, resulting in an operating margin of 15.2%.

RNMBY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rheinmetall AG ADR reported an operating income of 178.89M and revenue of 1.97B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.1%.

EZPW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EZCORP, Inc. reported a net income of 49.10M and revenue of 446.88M, resulting in a net margin of 11.0%.

RNMBY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rheinmetall AG ADR reported a net income of 112.83M and revenue of 1.97B, resulting in a net margin of 5.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


EZPW and RNMBY have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EZPW has higher volatility (15.70%) compared to RNMBY (12.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EZPW dropped -97.28% vs RNMBY's -67.75%.

EZPW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.82 vs -0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EZPW and RNMBY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer