EZPW vs. FSLR
EZPW (EZCORP, Inc.) and FSLR (First Solar, Inc.) are both stocks. EZPW operates in Credit Services (Financial Services), while FSLR operates in Solar (Technology). Over the past 10 years, EZPW returned 13.43%/yr vs 17.10%/yr for FSLR. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
EZPW vs. FSLR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EZPW achieves a 75.44% return, which is significantly higher than FSLR's -12.79% return. Over the past 10 years, EZPW has underperformed FSLR with an annualized return of 13.43%, while FSLR has yielded a comparatively higher 17.10% annualized return.
EZPW
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 10.80%
- 6M
- 59.43%
- YTD
- 75.44%
- 1Y
- 140.10%
- 3Y*
- 58.17%
- 5Y*
- 41.25%
- 10Y*
- 13.43%
FSLR
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- -15.98%
- 6M
- -4.54%
- YTD
- -12.79%
- 1Y
- 40.25%
- 3Y*
- 6.31%
- 5Y*
- 19.74%
- 10Y*
- 17.10%
EZPW vs. FSLR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EZPW EZCORP, Inc. | 75.44% | 58.92% | 39.82% | 7.24% | 10.58% | 53.86% | -29.77% | -11.77% | -36.64% | 14.55% |
FSLR First Solar, Inc. | -12.79% | 48.22% | 2.30% | 15.01% | 71.86% | -11.89% | 76.77% | 31.81% | -37.12% | 110.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between EZPW and FSLR is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2006 | 0.24 |
The correlation between EZPW and FSLR shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (1 year) to 0.24 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
EZPW:
$2.00B
FSLR:
$24.48B
EZPW:
$1.76
FSLR:
$15.48
EZPW:
19.36
FSLR:
14.72
EZPW:
0.13
FSLR:
0.35
EZPW:
1.92
FSLR:
4.52
EZPW:
2.54
FSLR:
2.48
EZPW:
$1.48B
FSLR:
$5.42B
EZPW:
$865.21M
FSLR:
$2.26B
EZPW:
$256.16M
FSLR:
$2.15B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EZPW vs. FSLR — Risk / Return Rank
EZPW
FSLR
EZPW vs. FSLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EZCORP, Inc. (EZPW) and First Solar, Inc. (FSLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EZPW | FSLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.58 | 1.17 | +0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 9.11 | 1.09 | +8.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 32.14 | 2.17 | +29.96 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EZPW vs. FSLR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EZPW drawdown since its inception was -97.28%, roughly equal to the maximum FSLR drawdown of -96.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EZPW and FSLR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EZPW | FSLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.28% | -96.22% | -1.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.19% | -35.10% | +18.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.51% | -59.97% | +39.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.94% | -59.97% | +24.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -76.59% | -61.26% | -15.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.51% | -28.41% | +17.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -59.00% | -63.05% | +4.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.58% | 17.53% | -12.95% |
Volatility
EZPW vs. FSLR - Volatility Comparison
EZCORP, Inc. (EZPW) has a higher volatility of 19.30% compared to First Solar, Inc. (FSLR) at 15.11%. This indicates that EZPW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EZPW | FSLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.30% | 15.11% | +4.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.72% | 39.86% | -10.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.56% | 54.00% | -16.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.42% | 54.12% | -19.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.98% | 50.78% | -11.80% |
Dividends
EZPW vs. FSLR - Dividend Comparison
Neither EZPW nor FSLR has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
EZPW vs. FSLR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between EZCORP, Inc. and First Solar, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
EZPW vs. FSLR - Profitability Comparison
EZPW - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, EZCORP, Inc. reported a gross profit of 260.04M and revenue of 446.88M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 58.2%.
FSLR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, First Solar, Inc. reported a gross profit of 486.13M and revenue of 1.04B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 46.6%.
EZPW - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, EZCORP, Inc. reported an operating income of 67.84M and revenue of 446.88M, resulting in an operating margin of 15.2%.
FSLR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, First Solar, Inc. reported an operating income of 345.30M and revenue of 1.04B, resulting in an operating margin of 33.1%.
EZPW - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, EZCORP, Inc. reported a net income of 49.10M and revenue of 446.88M, resulting in a net margin of 11.0%.
FSLR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, First Solar, Inc. reported a net income of 346.62M and revenue of 1.04B, resulting in a net margin of 33.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
EZPW and FSLR have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EZPW has higher volatility (19.30%) compared to FSLR (15.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EZPW dropped -97.28% vs FSLR's -96.22%.
EZPW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.94 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EZPW and FSLR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer