EZMO vs. MTUM

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

EZMO (AlphaDroid Broad Markets Momentum ETF) and MTUM (iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF) are both Momentum funds. EZMO is actively managed, while MTUM is passively managed. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EZMO charges 0.94%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for MTUM.

Performance

EZMO vs. MTUM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AlphaDroid Broad Markets Momentum ETF (EZMO) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EZMO achieves a 1.61% return, which is significantly lower than MTUM's 30.30% return.

EZMO

• 1D: -0.36%
• 1M: -0.11%
• YTD: 1.61%
• 6M: 1.59%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MTUM

• 1D: -1.10%
• 1M: 11.94%
• YTD: 30.30%
• 6M: 29.99%
• 1Y: 40.55%
• 3Y*: 34.34%
• 5Y*: 14.96%
• 10Y*: 17.19%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EZMO vs. MTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
EZMO AlphaDroid Broad Markets Momentum ETF	1.61%	5.20%
MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF	30.30%	-0.75%

Correlation

The correlation between EZMO and MTUM is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2025	0.65

Return for Risk

EZMO vs. MTUM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MTUM

MTUM Risk / Return Rank: 68
MTUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
MTUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
MTUM Omega Ratio Rank: 64
MTUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
MTUM Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EZMO vs. MTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AlphaDroid Broad Markets Momentum ETF (EZMO) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EZMO	MTUM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.14	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.73	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.82	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.74	0.84	-0.10

Drawdowns

EZMO vs. MTUM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EZMO drawdown since its inception was -9.23%, smaller than the maximum MTUM drawdown of -34.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EZMO and MTUM.

Drawdown Indicators

	EZMO	MTUM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.23%	-34.08%	+24.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-11.54%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-20.99%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-32.28%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.08%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.93%	-1.10%	-6.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.26%	-6.21%	+1.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.89%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	EZMO	MTUM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	7.67%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	16.51%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.17%	19.08%	-3.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.17%	20.60%	-5.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.17%	21.03%	-5.86%

EZMO vs. MTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison

EZMO has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is higher than MTUM's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

EZMO vs. MTUM - Dividend Comparison

EZMO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MTUM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EZMO AlphaDroid Broad Markets Momentum ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF	0.60%	0.91%	0.75%	1.35%	1.80%	0.55%	0.83%	1.48%	1.27%	1.02%	1.43%	1.12%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EZMO and MTUM in my portfolio?

EZMO and MTUM have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, EZMO or MTUM?

On fees, MTUM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EZMO or MTUM?

MTUM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.94% for EZMO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EZMO or MTUM?

MTUM has the higher dividend yield at 0.60%, compared with 0.00% for EZMO.

What is the main difference between EZMO and MTUM?

They also come from different issuers: AlphaDroid and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.94% for EZMO and 0.15% for MTUM.