EZM vs. FLQM

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

EZM (WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Earnings Fund) and FLQM (Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds - EZM tracks the WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Index while FLQM tracks the LibertyQ U.S. Mid Cap Equity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EZM returned 9.03%/yr vs 6.86%/yr for FLQM. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EZM charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for FLQM.

Performance

EZM vs. FLQM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Earnings Fund (EZM) and Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (FLQM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EZM achieves a 12.38% return, which is significantly higher than FLQM's 1.19% return.

EZM

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: 3.10%
• YTD: 12.38%
• 6M: 10.19%
• 1Y: 25.48%
• 3Y*: 15.48%
• 5Y*: 9.03%
• 10Y*: 11.24%

FLQM

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: -0.12%
• YTD: 1.19%
• 6M: -0.59%
• 1Y: 7.81%
• 3Y*: 10.89%
• 5Y*: 6.86%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EZM vs. FLQM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EZM WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Earnings Fund	12.38%	8.42%	10.29%	19.69%	-12.22%	31.00%	5.57%	24.48%	-12.36%	11.15%
FLQM Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF	1.19%	5.16%	14.32%	17.47%	-12.95%	28.76%	15.50%	28.56%	-4.24%	10.32%

Correlation

The correlation between EZM and FLQM is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.92
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2017	0.83

The correlation between EZM and FLQM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

EZM vs. FLQM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EZM	FLQM
Financial Services	19.0%	15.1%
Industrials	16.4%	17.9%
Consumer Cyclical	15.2%	18.8%
Technology	13.6%	13.4%
Healthcare	9.9%	12.3%
Energy	6.4%	5.3%
Consumer Defensive	5.1%	7.7%
Real Estate	5.0%	4.3%
Basic Materials	4.4%	0.2%
Utilities	3.2%	1.6%
Communication Services	1.9%	3.3%

Return for Risk

EZM vs. FLQM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EZM

EZM Risk / Return Rank: 55
EZM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
EZM Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
EZM Omega Ratio Rank: 48
EZM Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
EZM Martin Ratio Rank: 58

FLQM

FLQM Risk / Return Rank: 20
FLQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
FLQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
FLQM Omega Ratio Rank: 18
FLQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
FLQM Martin Ratio Rank: 23

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EZM vs. FLQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Earnings Fund (EZM) and Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (FLQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EZM	FLQM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.70	0.64	+1.06
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.58	1.04	+1.54
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.12	+0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.94	1.04	+1.90
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.98	2.86	+7.11

EZM vs. FLQM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EZM Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is higher than the FLQM Sharpe Ratio of 0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EZM and FLQM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EZM vs. FLQM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EZM drawdown since its inception was -59.58%, which is greater than FLQM's maximum drawdown of -37.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EZM and FLQM.

Drawdown Indicators

	EZM	FLQM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.58%	-37.26%	-22.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.70%	-7.57%	-1.13%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.53%	-19.70%	-3.83%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.53%	-22.51%	-1.02%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-47.26%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.57%	-2.86%	+2.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.25%	-4.91%	-3.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.56%	2.73%	-0.17%

Volatility

EZM vs. FLQM - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Earnings Fund (EZM) has a higher volatility of 4.00% compared to Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (FLQM) at 3.08%. This indicates that EZM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EZM	FLQM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.00%	3.08%	+0.92%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.53%	8.52%	+2.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.08%	12.24%	+2.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.40%	16.40%	+4.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.37%	18.45%	+3.92%

EZM vs. FLQM - Expense Ratio Comparison

EZM has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than FLQM's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

EZM vs. FLQM - Dividend Comparison

EZM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%, less than FLQM's 1.51% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EZM WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Earnings Fund	1.24%	1.39%	1.22%	1.25%	1.57%	1.08%	1.67%	1.34%	1.57%	1.14%	1.55%	1.30%
FLQM Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF	1.51%	1.49%	1.28%	1.27%	1.33%	1.05%	1.10%	1.37%	1.42%	1.15%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EZM and FLQM in my portfolio?

EZM and FLQM have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EZM or FLQM?

EZM has higher volatility (4.00%) compared to FLQM (3.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EZM dropped -59.58% vs FLQM's -37.26%.

Which ETF is better, EZM or FLQM?

On 5-year performance, EZM leads with 9.03% vs 6.86% for FLQM. On fees, FLQM is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, FLQM has been the lower-risk option at 3.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EZM or FLQM?

Over the 5-year period, EZM has performed better with a 9.03% return vs 6.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EZM or FLQM?

FLQM is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for EZM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EZM or FLQM?

FLQM has the higher dividend yield at 1.51%, compared with 1.24% for EZM.

What is the main difference between EZM and FLQM?

EZM tracks WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Index, while FLQM tracks LibertyQ U.S. Mid Cap Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for EZM and 0.30% for FLQM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EZM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.