EZM vs. DRES
EZM (WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Earnings Fund) and DRES (GMO Domestic Resilience ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. EZM is passively managed, while DRES is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.82 means they have usually moved in the same direction. EZM charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for DRES.
Performance
EZM vs. DRES - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EZM achieves a 14.20% return, which is significantly lower than DRES's 21.60% return.
EZM
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 1.12%
- 6M
- 10.42%
- YTD
- 14.20%
- 1Y
- 24.29%
- 3Y*
- 12.50%
- 5Y*
- 9.10%
- 10Y*
- 10.91%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.62%
DRES
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- 6M
- 12.48%
- YTD
- 21.60%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $93.72K | $76.15K | $99.36K | |
| $1.17M | $1.36M | $1.30M |
EZM vs. DRES - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EZM WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Earnings Fund | 14.20% | 1.74% |
DRES GMO Domestic Resilience ETF | 21.60% | 2.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between EZM and DRES is 0.82, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2025 | 0.82 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EZM vs. DRES — Risk / Return Rank
EZM
DRES
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
EZM vs. DRES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Earnings Fund (EZM) and GMO Domestic Resilience ETF (DRES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EZM | DRES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.62 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.10 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EZM vs. DRES - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EZM drawdown since its inception was -59.58%, which is greater than DRES's maximum drawdown of -10.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EZM and DRES.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EZM | DRES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.58% | -10.41% | -49.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.70% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.53% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.53% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.26% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.77% | -1.59% | +0.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.21% | -2.14% | -6.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.50% | — | — |
Volatility
EZM vs. DRES - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EZM | DRES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.85% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.08% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.66% | 18.07% | -3.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.25% | 18.07% | +2.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.27% | 18.07% | +4.20% |
EZM vs. DRES - Expense Ratio Comparison
EZM has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than DRES's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
EZM vs. DRES - Dividend Comparison
EZM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, more than DRES's 0.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRES GMO Domestic Resilience ETF | 0.52% | 0.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EZM WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Earnings Fund | 1.21% | 1.39% | 1.22% | 1.25% | 1.57% | 1.08% | 1.67% | 1.34% | 1.57% | 1.14% | 1.55% | 1.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EZM and DRES have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EZM is cheaper at 0.38% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EZM is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for DRES.
EZM has the higher dividend yield at 1.21%, compared with 0.52% for DRES.
They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and GMO. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for EZM and 0.50% for DRES.
Find the right allocation for EZM and DRES
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer