EZJ vs. UYG
EZJ (ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan) and UYG (ProShares Ultra Financials) are both Leveraged Equities funds from ProShares - EZJ tracks the MSCI Japan Index (200%) while UYG tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Financials Index (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EZJ returned 10.41%/yr vs 16.66%/yr for UYG. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
EZJ vs. UYG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EZJ achieves a 22.90% return, which is significantly higher than UYG's -12.27% return. Over the past 10 years, EZJ has underperformed UYG with an annualized return of 10.41%, while UYG has yielded a comparatively higher 16.66% annualized return.
EZJ
- 1D
- 2.82%
- 1M
- -1.47%
- YTD
- 22.90%
- 6M
- 24.37%
- 1Y
- 52.49%
- 3Y*
- 23.35%
- 5Y*
- 7.01%
- 10Y*
- 10.41%
UYG
- 1D
- -1.25%
- 1M
- 2.35%
- YTD
- -12.27%
- 6M
- -7.44%
- 1Y
- -2.19%
- 3Y*
- 27.27%
- 5Y*
- 9.44%
- 10Y*
- 16.66%
EZJ vs. UYG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EZJ ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan | 22.90% | 42.72% | 3.31% | 30.78% | -38.23% | -1.96% | 22.21% | 33.76% | -30.99% | 49.10% |
UYG ProShares Ultra Financials | -12.27% | 19.77% | 55.71% | 22.14% | -32.11% | 76.26% | -20.32% | 66.15% | -22.61% | 39.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between EZJ and UYG is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 8, 2009 | 0.55 |
The correlation between EZJ and UYG shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (1 year) to 0.55 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
EZJ vs. UYG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EZJ
UYG
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Energy
-
Industrials
EZJ
UYG
Technology
EZJ
UYG
Financial Services
EZJ
UYG
Consumer Cyclical
EZJ
UYG
-
Communication Services
EZJ
UYG
-
Healthcare
EZJ
UYG
-
Consumer Defensive
EZJ
UYG
-
Basic Materials
EZJ
UYG
-
Real Estate
EZJ
UYG
-
Utilities
EZJ
UYG
-
Energy
EZJ
UYG
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EZJ vs. UYG — Risk / Return Rank
EZJ
UYG
EZJ vs. UYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan (EZJ) and ProShares Ultra Financials (UYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EZJ | UYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.01 | +0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.97 | -0.08 | +2.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.01 | -0.18 | +6.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EZJ | UYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.30 | -0.08 | +1.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 | 0.26 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.30 | 0.41 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | -0.00 | +0.23 |
Drawdowns
EZJ vs. UYG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EZJ drawdown since its inception was -58.63%, smaller than the maximum UYG drawdown of -97.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EZJ and UYG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EZJ | UYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.63% | -97.90% | +39.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.78% | -28.91% | +2.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.48% | -30.35% | -1.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -58.63% | -47.77% | -10.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -58.63% | -69.98% | +11.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.62% | -17.15% | +8.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.28% | -63.34% | +42.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.76% | 12.01% | -3.25% |
Volatility
EZJ vs. UYG - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan (EZJ) has a higher volatility of 10.77% compared to ProShares Ultra Financials (UYG) at 8.39%. This indicates that EZJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EZJ | UYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.77% | 8.39% | +2.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.80% | 22.38% | +9.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.51% | 29.26% | +11.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.76% | 36.22% | +0.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.63% | 41.07% | -6.44% |
EZJ vs. UYG - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both EZJ and UYG have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
EZJ vs. UYG - Dividend Comparison
EZJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.68%, less than UYG's 13.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EZJ ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan | 1.68% | 1.13% | 2.09% | 1.11% | 0.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.24% | 4.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UYG ProShares Ultra Financials | 13.32% | 11.72% | 0.51% | 0.79% | 0.77% | 9.39% | 0.66% | 0.90% | 1.28% | 0.56% | 0.76% | 0.72% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EZJ and UYG have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EZJ has higher volatility (10.77%) compared to UYG (8.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EZJ dropped -58.63% vs UYG's -97.90%.
On 10-year performance, UYG leads with 16.66% vs 10.41% for EZJ. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, UYG has been the lower-risk option at 8.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, UYG has performed better with a 16.66% return vs 10.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EZJ and UYG have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
UYG has the higher dividend yield at 13.32%, compared with 1.68% for EZJ.
EZJ tracks MSCI Japan Index (200%), while UYG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Financials Index (200%).
EZJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.30 vs -0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EZJ and UYG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer