EZJ vs. SQQQ
EZJ (ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan) and SQQQ (ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ) are both exchange-traded funds - EZJ is a Japan Equities fund tracking the MSCI Japan Index (200%), while SQQQ is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index (-300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EZJ returned 10.26%/yr vs -55.39%/yr for SQQQ. At a correlation of -0.56, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
EZJ vs. SQQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EZJ achieves a 26.97% return, which is significantly higher than SQQQ's -41.78% return. Over the past 10 years, EZJ has outperformed SQQQ with an annualized return of 10.26%, while SQQQ has yielded a comparatively lower -55.39% annualized return.
EZJ
- 1D
- -0.86%
- 1M
- -2.08%
- 6M
- 15.00%
- YTD
- 26.97%
- 1Y
- 66.17%
- 3Y*
- 24.71%
- 5Y*
- 8.65%
- 10Y*
- 10.26%
SQQQ
- 1D
- 0.80%
- 1M
- 8.96%
- 6M
- -40.42%
- YTD
- -41.78%
- 1Y
- -56.67%
- 3Y*
- -52.19%
- 5Y*
- -46.41%
- 10Y*
- -55.39%
EZJ vs. SQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EZJ ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan | 26.97% | 42.72% | 3.31% | 30.78% | -38.23% | -1.96% | 22.21% | 33.76% | -30.99% | 49.10% |
SQQQ ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ | -41.78% | -53.05% | -49.79% | -73.61% | 82.40% | -60.87% | -86.40% | -65.92% | -20.83% | -58.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between EZJ and SQQQ is -0.62, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.61 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2010 | -0.56 |
The correlation between EZJ and SQQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.62 to -0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.
EZJ vs. SQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EZJ
SQQQ
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Energy
-
Industrials
EZJ
SQQQ
-
Technology
EZJ
SQQQ
-
Financial Services
EZJ
SQQQ
Consumer Cyclical
EZJ
SQQQ
-
Communication Services
EZJ
SQQQ
-
Healthcare
EZJ
SQQQ
-
Consumer Defensive
EZJ
SQQQ
-
Basic Materials
EZJ
SQQQ
-
Real Estate
EZJ
SQQQ
-
Utilities
EZJ
SQQQ
-
Energy
EZJ
SQQQ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EZJ vs. SQQQ — Risk / Return Rank
EZJ
SQQQ
EZJ vs. SQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan (EZJ) and ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EZJ | SQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 0.82 | +0.47 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.48 | -0.93 | +3.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.44 | -1.71 | +9.15 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EZJ vs. SQQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EZJ drawdown since its inception was -58.63%, smaller than the maximum SQQQ drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EZJ and SQQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EZJ | SQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.63% | -100.00% | +41.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.78% | -61.03% | +34.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.48% | -92.51% | +61.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -58.63% | -97.27% | +38.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -58.63% | -99.97% | +41.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.93% | -100.00% | +92.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.19% | -92.76% | +71.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.92% | 33.18% | -24.26% |
Volatility
EZJ vs. SQQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan (EZJ) is 14.81%, while ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ) has a volatility of 24.13%. This indicates that EZJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EZJ | SQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.81% | 24.13% | -9.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.73% | 45.92% | -11.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.43% | 55.62% | -13.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.22% | 67.88% | -30.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.69% | 66.56% | -31.87% |
EZJ vs. SQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both EZJ and SQQQ have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
EZJ vs. SQQQ - Dividend Comparison
EZJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.87%, less than SQQQ's 10.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EZJ ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan | 1.87% | 1.13% | 2.09% | 1.11% | 0.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.24% | 4.49% | 0.00% |
SQQQ ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ | 10.26% | 9.36% | 10.23% | 8.01% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 2.15% | 2.92% | 1.47% | 0.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EZJ and SQQQ have a correlation of -0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SQQQ has higher volatility (24.13%) compared to EZJ (14.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EZJ dropped -58.63% vs SQQQ's -100.00%.
On 10-year performance, EZJ leads with 10.26% vs -55.39% for SQQQ. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, EZJ has been the lower-risk option at 14.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EZJ has performed better with a 10.26% return vs -55.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EZJ and SQQQ have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
SQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 10.26%, compared with 1.87% for EZJ.
EZJ is categorized as Japan Equities, while SQQQ is Leveraged Equities. EZJ tracks MSCI Japan Index (200%), while SQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (-300%).
EZJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs -1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EZJ and SQQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer