EZJ vs. QTJL

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

EZJ (ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan) and QTJL (Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July) are both Leveraged Equities funds. EZJ is passively managed, while QTJL is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, EZJ returned 26.09%/yr vs 19.18%/yr for QTJL. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EZJ charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for QTJL.

Performance

EZJ vs. QTJL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan (EZJ) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EZJ achieves a 29.29% return, which is significantly higher than QTJL's 7.18% return.

EZJ

• 1D: 0.39%
• 1M: 10.56%
• YTD: 29.29%
• 6M: 28.96%
• 1Y: 58.99%
• 3Y*: 26.09%
• 5Y*: 7.76%
• 10Y*: 10.56%

QTJL

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 1.08%
• YTD: 7.18%
• 6M: 7.93%
• 1Y: 20.28%
• 3Y*: 19.18%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EZJ vs. QTJL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
EZJ ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan	29.29%	42.72%	3.31%	30.78%	-38.23%	-1.56%
QTJL Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July	7.18%	21.07%	16.50%	42.39%	-30.16%	9.32%

Correlation

The correlation between EZJ and QTJL is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.53
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.54
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2021	0.58

The correlation between EZJ and QTJL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

EZJ vs. QTJL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EZJ	QTJL
Industrials	26.0%	2.8%
Technology	19.1%	54.2%
Financial Services	17.6%	0.2%
Consumer Cyclical	12.2%	12.2%
Communication Services	7.9%	15.5%
Healthcare	6.2%	4.2%
Consumer Defensive	3.6%	7.6%
Basic Materials	3.0%	1.2%
Real Estate	2.3%	0.1%
Utilities	1.1%	1.4%
Energy	1.1%	0.6%

Return for Risk

EZJ vs. QTJL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EZJ

EZJ Risk / Return Rank: 43
EZJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
EZJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
EZJ Omega Ratio Rank: 43
EZJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
EZJ Martin Ratio Rank: 43

QTJL

QTJL Risk / Return Rank: 68
QTJL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
QTJL Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
QTJL Omega Ratio Rank: 71
QTJL Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
QTJL Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EZJ vs. QTJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan (EZJ) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EZJ	QTJL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.49	2.04	-0.54
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.10	2.90	-0.80
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.41	-0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.21	3.05	-0.83
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.79	16.05	-9.27
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EZJ vs. QTJL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EZJ Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is comparable to the QTJL Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EZJ and QTJL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EZJ	QTJL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.49	2.04	-0.54
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.21	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.31	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.24	0.52	-0.29

Drawdowns

EZJ vs. QTJL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EZJ drawdown since its inception was -58.63%, which is greater than QTJL's maximum drawdown of -33.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EZJ and QTJL.

Drawdown Indicators

	EZJ	QTJL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.63%	-33.40%	-25.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-26.78%	-6.68%	-20.10%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-31.48%	-22.43%	-9.05%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-58.63%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-58.63%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.87%	0.00%	-3.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.28%	-7.93%	-13.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.72%	1.27%	+7.45%

Volatility

EZJ vs. QTJL - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan (EZJ) has a higher volatility of 8.46% compared to Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL) at 0.30%. This indicates that EZJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QTJL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EZJ	QTJL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.46%	0.30%	+8.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	30.74%	7.60%	+23.14%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	39.67%	9.99%	+29.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	36.58%	20.42%	+16.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	34.53%	20.42%	+14.11%

EZJ vs. QTJL - Expense Ratio Comparison

EZJ has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than QTJL's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

EZJ vs. QTJL - Dividend Comparison

EZJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%, while QTJL has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
EZJ ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan	1.60%	1.13%	2.09%	1.11%	0.56%	0.00%	0.00%	0.24%	4.49%
QTJL Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EZJ and QTJL in my portfolio?

EZJ and QTJL have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EZJ or QTJL?

EZJ has higher volatility (8.46%) compared to QTJL (0.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EZJ dropped -58.63% vs QTJL's -33.40%.

Which ETF is better, EZJ or QTJL?

On 3-year performance, EZJ leads with 26.09% vs 19.18% for QTJL. On fees, QTJL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, QTJL has been the lower-risk option at 0.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EZJ or QTJL?

Over the 3-year period, EZJ has performed better with a 26.09% return vs 19.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EZJ or QTJL?

QTJL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for EZJ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EZJ or QTJL?

EZJ has the higher dividend yield at 1.60%, compared with 0.00% for QTJL.

What is the main difference between EZJ and QTJL?

They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for EZJ and 0.79% for QTJL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QTJL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.