PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EZJ vs. GSJY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EZJ vs. GSJY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan (EZJ) and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF (GSJY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EZJ achieves a 29.20% return, which is significantly higher than GSJY's 16.41% return. Over the past 10 years, EZJ has outperformed GSJY with an annualized return of 10.05%, while GSJY has yielded a comparatively lower 9.25% annualized return.


EZJ

1D
3.68%
1M
2.34%
6M
12.88%
YTD
29.20%
1Y
54.78%
3Y*
26.39%
5Y*
8.53%
10Y*
10.05%
ALL TIME*
8.15%

GSJY

1D
1.83%
1M
2.61%
6M
8.28%
YTD
16.41%
1Y
29.97%
3Y*
18.67%
5Y*
9.66%
10Y*
9.25%
ALL TIME*
9.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$67.09K$107.47K$207.90K
$170.72K$189.37K$272.48K

EZJ vs. GSJY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EZJ
ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan
29.20%42.72%3.31%30.78%-38.23%-1.96%22.21%33.76%-30.99%49.10%
GSJY
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF
16.41%26.22%8.89%19.18%-16.15%0.41%13.81%18.29%-11.56%25.50%

Correlation

The correlation between EZJ and GSJY is 0.98 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 4, 2016

0.91

The correlation between EZJ and GSJY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

EZJ vs. GSJY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EZJ
GSJY

Technology

24.6%
23.3%

Industrials

22.8%
23.3%

Financial Services

17.7%
18.8%

Consumer Cyclical

11.3%
12.0%

Communication Services

8.1%
5.9%

Healthcare

5.3%
4.6%

Consumer Defensive

3.4%
3.1%

Basic Materials

3.1%
3.4%

Real Estate

1.9%
1.2%

Utilities

1.0%
1.5%

Energy

0.8%
3.0%

Technology

EZJ
24.6%
GSJY
23.3%

Industrials

EZJ
22.8%
GSJY
23.3%

Financial Services

EZJ
17.7%
GSJY
18.8%

Consumer Cyclical

EZJ
11.3%
GSJY
12.0%

Communication Services

EZJ
8.1%
GSJY
5.9%

Healthcare

EZJ
5.3%
GSJY
4.6%

Consumer Defensive

EZJ
3.4%
GSJY
3.1%

Basic Materials

EZJ
3.1%
GSJY
3.4%

Real Estate

EZJ
1.9%
GSJY
1.2%

Utilities

EZJ
1.0%
GSJY
1.5%

Energy

EZJ
0.8%
GSJY
3.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EZJ vs. GSJY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EZJ
EZJ Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
EZJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EZJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
EZJ Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
EZJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
EZJ Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

GSJY
GSJY Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
GSJY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSJY Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSJY Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
GSJY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSJY Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EZJ vs. GSJY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan (EZJ) and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF (GSJY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EZJGSJYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.28

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.06

2.14

-0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.91

6.85

-0.94

EZJ vs. GSJY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EZJ Sharpe Ratio is 1.29, which is comparable to the GSJY Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EZJ and GSJY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EZJ vs. GSJY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EZJ drawdown since its inception was -58.63%, which is greater than GSJY's maximum drawdown of -32.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EZJ and GSJY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EZJGSJYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.63%

-32.53%

-26.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.78%

-14.08%

-12.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.48%

-14.96%

-16.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-58.63%

-32.53%

-26.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.63%

-32.53%

-26.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.31%

-0.68%

-5.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.16%

-7.51%

-13.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.30%

4.39%

+4.91%

Volatility

EZJ vs. GSJY - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan (EZJ) has a higher volatility of 15.00% compared to Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF (GSJY) at 6.96%. This indicates that EZJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSJY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EZJGSJYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.00%

6.96%

+8.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.21%

17.30%

+18.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.87%

20.53%

+22.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.52%

18.42%

+19.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.85%

17.17%

+17.68%

EZJ vs. GSJY - Expense Ratio Comparison

EZJ has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than GSJY's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

EZJ vs. GSJY - Dividend Comparison

EZJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.84%, less than GSJY's 1.99% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
EZJ
ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan
1.84%1.13%2.09%1.11%0.56%0.00%0.00%0.24%4.49%0.00%0.00%
GSJY
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF
1.99%1.99%1.64%2.11%2.13%1.73%1.22%2.79%3.28%1.70%2.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, EZJ and GSJY move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

EZJ has higher volatility (15.00%) compared to GSJY (6.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EZJ dropped -58.63% vs GSJY's -32.53%.

On 10-year performance, EZJ leads with 10.05% vs 9.25% for GSJY. On fees, GSJY is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, GSJY has been the lower-risk option at 6.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EZJ has performed better with a 10.05% return vs 9.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GSJY is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for EZJ.

GSJY has the higher dividend yield at 1.99%, compared with 1.84% for EZJ.

EZJ tracks MSCI Japan Index (200%), while GSJY tracks Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for EZJ and 0.25% for GSJY.

GSJY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EZJ and GSJY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer