EZJ vs. BBJP
EZJ (ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan) and BBJP (JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EZJ is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the MSCI Japan Index (200%), while BBJP is a Japan Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Japan Target Market Exposure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EZJ returned 7.76%/yr vs 8.99%/yr for BBJP. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. EZJ charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for BBJP.
Performance
EZJ vs. BBJP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EZJ achieves a 29.29% return, which is significantly higher than BBJP's 15.72% return.
EZJ
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 10.56%
- YTD
- 29.29%
- 6M
- 28.96%
- 1Y
- 58.99%
- 3Y*
- 26.09%
- 5Y*
- 7.76%
- 10Y*
- 10.56%
BBJP
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- 5.16%
- YTD
- 15.72%
- 6M
- 16.31%
- 1Y
- 32.49%
- 3Y*
- 18.68%
- 5Y*
- 8.99%
- 10Y*
- —
EZJ vs. BBJP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EZJ ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan | 29.29% | 42.72% | 3.31% | 30.78% | -38.23% | -1.96% | 22.21% | 33.76% | -29.40% |
BBJP JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF | 15.72% | 26.55% | 7.47% | 20.65% | -17.24% | 1.21% | 15.42% | 18.85% | -13.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between EZJ and BBJP is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2018 | 0.96 |
The correlation between EZJ and BBJP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
EZJ vs. BBJP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EZJ
BBJP
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Utilities
Energy
Industrials
EZJ
BBJP
Technology
EZJ
BBJP
Financial Services
EZJ
BBJP
Consumer Cyclical
EZJ
BBJP
Communication Services
EZJ
BBJP
Healthcare
EZJ
BBJP
Consumer Defensive
EZJ
BBJP
Basic Materials
EZJ
BBJP
Real Estate
EZJ
BBJP
Utilities
EZJ
BBJP
Energy
EZJ
BBJP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EZJ vs. BBJP — Risk / Return Rank
EZJ
BBJP
EZJ vs. BBJP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan (EZJ) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF (BBJP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EZJ | BBJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.31 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.21 | 2.40 | -0.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.79 | 8.07 | -1.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EZJ | BBJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.49 | 1.68 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 | 0.50 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.45 | -0.22 |
Drawdowns
EZJ vs. BBJP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EZJ drawdown since its inception was -58.63%, which is greater than BBJP's maximum drawdown of -32.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EZJ and BBJP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EZJ | BBJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.63% | -32.66% | -25.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.78% | -13.60% | -13.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.48% | -14.49% | -16.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -58.63% | -32.66% | -25.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -58.63% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.87% | -0.55% | -3.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.28% | -8.52% | -12.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.72% | 4.04% | +4.68% |
Volatility
EZJ vs. BBJP - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan (EZJ) has a higher volatility of 8.46% compared to JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF (BBJP) at 4.15%. This indicates that EZJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBJP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EZJ | BBJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.46% | 4.15% | +4.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.74% | 14.98% | +15.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.67% | 19.40% | +20.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.58% | 18.15% | +18.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.53% | 18.29% | +16.24% |
EZJ vs. BBJP - Expense Ratio Comparison
EZJ has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than BBJP's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
EZJ vs. BBJP - Dividend Comparison
EZJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%, less than BBJP's 4.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBJP JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF | 4.64% | 5.37% | 2.80% | 3.05% | 1.52% | 2.89% | 1.12% | 2.31% | 0.65% |
EZJ ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan | 1.60% | 1.13% | 2.09% | 1.11% | 0.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.24% | 4.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, EZJ and BBJP move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
EZJ has higher volatility (8.46%) compared to BBJP (4.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EZJ dropped -58.63% vs BBJP's -32.66%.
On 5-year performance, BBJP leads with 8.99% vs 7.76% for EZJ. On fees, BBJP is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, BBJP has been the lower-risk option at 4.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BBJP has performed better with a 8.99% return vs 7.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BBJP is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for EZJ.
BBJP has the higher dividend yield at 4.64%, compared with 1.60% for EZJ.
EZJ is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while BBJP is Japan Equities. EZJ tracks MSCI Japan Index (200%), while BBJP tracks Morningstar Japan Target Market Exposure Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for EZJ and 0.19% for BBJP.
BBJP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EZJ and BBJP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer