EZET vs. FLJH

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

EZET (Franklin Ethereum ETF) and FLJH (Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EZET is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CME CF Ether-Dollar Reference Rate - New York Variant, while FLJH is a Japan Equities fund tracking the FTSE Japan RIC Capped Hedged to USD Net Tax Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, EZET returned -32.57% vs 48.16% for FLJH. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EZET charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for FLJH.

Performance

EZET vs. FLJH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Ethereum ETF (EZET) and Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EZET achieves a -40.23% return, which is significantly lower than FLJH's 20.41% return.

EZET

• 1D: -1.32%
• 1M: -25.14%
• YTD: -40.23%
• 6M: -43.56%
• 1Y: -32.57%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FLJH

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: 7.06%
• YTD: 20.41%
• 6M: 17.72%
• 1Y: 48.16%
• 3Y*: 28.28%
• 5Y*: 20.83%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EZET vs. FLJH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
EZET Franklin Ethereum ETF	-40.23%	-11.23%	-3.68%
FLJH Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF	20.41%	25.26%	0.91%

Correlation

The correlation between EZET and FLJH is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.25
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2024	0.27

Return for Risk

EZET vs. FLJH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EZET

EZET Risk / Return Rank: 5
EZET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
EZET Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
EZET Omega Ratio Rank: 6
EZET Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
EZET Martin Ratio Rank: 5

FLJH

FLJH Risk / Return Rank: 84
FLJH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
FLJH Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
FLJH Omega Ratio Rank: 83
FLJH Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
FLJH Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EZET vs. FLJH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Ethereum ETF (EZET) and Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EZET	FLJH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.48	2.70	-3.17
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.34	3.70	-4.04
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.96	1.50	-0.54
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.52	4.48	-5.00
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.86	17.57	-18.43
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EZET vs. FLJH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EZET Sharpe Ratio is -0.48, which is lower than the FLJH Sharpe Ratio of 2.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EZET and FLJH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EZET	FLJH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.48	2.70	-3.17
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.13	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.42	0.75	-1.17

Drawdowns

EZET vs. FLJH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EZET drawdown since its inception was -64.05%, which is greater than FLJH's maximum drawdown of -31.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EZET and FLJH.

Drawdown Indicators

	EZET	FLJH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-64.05%	-31.51%	-32.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-63.36%	-10.80%	-52.56%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-20.39%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-20.39%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-63.36%	0.00%	-63.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-32.74%	-5.31%	-27.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	37.94%	2.75%	+35.19%

Volatility

EZET vs. FLJH - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Ethereum ETF (EZET) has a higher volatility of 9.68% compared to Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH) at 3.25%. This indicates that EZET's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLJH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EZET	FLJH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.68%	3.25%	+6.43%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	45.32%	13.38%	+31.94%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	68.34%	17.97%	+50.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	72.29%	18.51%	+53.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	72.29%	19.82%	+52.47%

EZET vs. FLJH - Expense Ratio Comparison

EZET has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than FLJH's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

EZET vs. FLJH - Dividend Comparison

EZET has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FLJH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.24%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EZET Franklin Ethereum ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FLJH Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF	3.24%	3.90%	5.06%	25.59%	26.67%	1.29%	0.00%	0.00%	5.92%	0.10%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EZET and FLJH in my portfolio?

EZET and FLJH have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EZET or FLJH?

EZET has higher volatility (9.68%) compared to FLJH (3.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EZET dropped -64.05% vs FLJH's -31.51%.

Which ETF is better, EZET or FLJH?

On 1-year performance, FLJH leads with 48.16% vs -32.57% for EZET. On fees, FLJH is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, FLJH has been the lower-risk option at 3.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EZET or FLJH?

Over the 1-year period, FLJH has performed better with a 48.16% return vs -32.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EZET or FLJH?

FLJH is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for EZET.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EZET or FLJH?

FLJH has the higher dividend yield at 3.24%, compared with 0.00% for EZET.

What is the main difference between EZET and FLJH?

EZET is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while FLJH is Japan Equities. EZET tracks CME CF Ether-Dollar Reference Rate - New York Variant, while FLJH tracks FTSE Japan RIC Capped Hedged to USD Net Tax Index. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for EZET and 0.09% for FLJH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLJH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs -0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.