PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EZET vs. EZPZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EZET vs. EZPZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Ethereum ETF (EZET) and Franklin Crypto Index ETF (EZPZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EZET achieves a -39.43% return, which is significantly lower than EZPZ's -28.21% return.


EZET

1D
-5.67%
1M
-23.67%
YTD
-39.43%
6M
-42.74%
1Y
-31.70%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

EZPZ

1D
-3.03%
1M
-18.55%
YTD
-28.21%
6M
-33.71%
1Y
-39.21%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EZET vs. EZPZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
EZET
Franklin Ethereum ETF
-39.43%7.80%
EZPZ
Franklin Crypto Index ETF
-28.21%-10.23%

Correlation

The correlation between EZET and EZPZ is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2025

0.91

The correlation between EZET and EZPZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EZET vs. EZPZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EZET
EZET Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
EZET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EZET Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
EZET Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
EZET Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
EZET Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

EZPZ
EZPZ Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
EZPZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EZPZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
EZPZ Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
EZPZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
EZPZ Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EZET vs. EZPZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Ethereum ETF (EZET) and Franklin Crypto Index ETF (EZPZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EZETEZPZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

0.87

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.51

-0.75

+0.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.84

-1.29

+0.45

EZET vs. EZPZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EZET Sharpe Ratio is -0.47, which is higher than the EZPZ Sharpe Ratio of -0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EZET and EZPZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EZETEZPZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.47

-0.84

+0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.41

-0.61

+0.20

Drawdowns

EZET vs. EZPZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EZET drawdown since its inception was -64.05%, which is greater than EZPZ's maximum drawdown of -52.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EZET and EZPZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EZETEZPZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.05%

-52.38%

-11.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-62.87%

-52.38%

-10.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-62.87%

-51.59%

-11.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.67%

-21.72%

-10.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

37.73%

30.44%

+7.29%

Volatility

EZET vs. EZPZ - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Ethereum ETF (EZET) and Franklin Crypto Index ETF (EZPZ) have volatilities of 9.88% and 9.74%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EZETEZPZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.88%

9.74%

+0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

46.05%

36.71%

+9.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

68.43%

46.83%

+21.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

72.37%

47.65%

+24.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

72.37%

47.65%

+24.72%

EZET vs. EZPZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both EZET and EZPZ have an expense ratio of 0.19%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

EZET vs. EZPZ - Dividend Comparison

Neither EZET nor EZPZ has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, EZET and EZPZ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

EZET has higher volatility (9.88%) compared to EZPZ (9.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EZET dropped -64.05% vs EZPZ's -52.38%.

On 1-year performance, EZET leads with -31.70% vs -39.21% for EZPZ. Both ETFs have the same 0.19% expense ratio. On volatility, EZPZ has been the lower-risk option at 9.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, EZET has performed better with a -31.70% return vs -39.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EZET and EZPZ have the same expense ratio: 0.19% per year.

EZET and EZPZ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

EZET tracks CME CF Ether-Dollar Reference Rate - New York Variant, while EZPZ tracks CF Institutional Digital Asset Index – US-Settlement Price.

EZET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.47 vs -0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EZET and EZPZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer