EZA vs. BNO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

EZA (iShares MSCI South Africa ETF) and BNO (United States Brent Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - EZA is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI South Africa Index, while BNO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Brent Crude Oil. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EZA returned 7.31%/yr vs 13.60%/yr for BNO. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EZA charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for BNO.

Performance

EZA vs. BNO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI South Africa ETF (EZA) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EZA achieves a -2.56% return, which is significantly lower than BNO's 90.47% return. Over the past 10 years, EZA has underperformed BNO with an annualized return of 7.31%, while BNO has yielded a comparatively higher 13.60% annualized return.

EZA

• 1D: -2.20%
• 1M: -0.12%
• YTD: -2.56%
• 6M: 5.66%
• 1Y: 34.67%
• 3Y*: 26.60%
• 5Y*: 8.78%
• 10Y*: 7.31%

BNO

• 1D: 1.99%
• 1M: -10.29%
• YTD: 90.47%
• 6M: 86.00%
• 1Y: 91.89%
• 3Y*: 27.93%
• 5Y*: 24.16%
• 10Y*: 13.60%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EZA vs. BNO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EZA iShares MSCI South Africa ETF	-2.56%	75.20%	7.16%	1.51%	-5.18%	7.91%	-5.19%	9.83%	-25.24%	36.03%
BNO United States Brent Oil Fund LP	90.47%	-5.44%	9.67%	-3.43%	35.25%	62.34%	-38.23%	36.01%	-15.30%	15.43%

Correlation

The correlation between EZA and BNO is -0.33, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.33
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.03
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.08
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.17
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2010	0.24

The correlation between EZA and BNO shifts across timeframes, from -0.33 (1 year) to 0.24 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

EZA vs. BNO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EZA

EZA Risk / Return Rank: 30
EZA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
EZA Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
EZA Omega Ratio Rank: 30
EZA Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
EZA Martin Ratio Rank: 29

BNO

BNO Risk / Return Rank: 65
BNO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
BNO Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
BNO Omega Ratio Rank: 60
BNO Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
BNO Martin Ratio Rank: 55

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EZA vs. BNO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI South Africa ETF (EZA) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EZA	BNO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.12	2.23	-1.11
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.59	2.73	-1.13
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.38	-0.17
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.49	5.17	-3.67
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.19	9.76	-5.57
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EZA vs. BNO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EZA Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is lower than the BNO Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EZA and BNO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EZA	BNO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.12	2.23	-1.11
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.31	0.69	-0.38
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.23	0.37	-0.14
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.28	0.14	+0.14

Drawdowns

EZA vs. BNO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EZA drawdown since its inception was -64.64%, smaller than the maximum BNO drawdown of -87.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EZA and BNO.

Drawdown Indicators

	EZA	BNO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-64.64%	-87.06%	+22.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-23.31%	-17.87%	-5.44%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.31%	-23.75%	+0.44%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.94%	-33.70%	-1.24%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-62.25%	-75.18%	+12.93%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-17.84%	-10.29%	-7.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.92%	-40.17%	+23.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.30%	9.45%	-1.15%

Volatility

EZA vs. BNO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI South Africa ETF (EZA) is 10.55%, while United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO) has a volatility of 14.22%. This indicates that EZA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BNO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EZA	BNO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.55%	14.22%	-3.67%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	26.15%	36.10%	-9.95%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	31.03%	41.46%	-10.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.69%	35.38%	-6.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	31.37%	36.68%	-5.31%

EZA vs. BNO - Expense Ratio Comparison

EZA has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than BNO's 0.90% expense ratio.

Dividends

EZA vs. BNO - Dividend Comparison

EZA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.32%, while BNO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BNO United States Brent Oil Fund LP	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
EZA iShares MSCI South Africa ETF	6.32%	6.16%	7.26%	2.84%	3.90%	2.05%	5.51%	12.27%	3.81%	1.55%	4.10%	3.03%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EZA and BNO in my portfolio?

EZA and BNO have a correlation of -0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EZA or BNO?

BNO has higher volatility (14.22%) compared to EZA (10.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EZA dropped -64.64% vs BNO's -87.06%.

Which ETF is better, EZA or BNO?

On 10-year performance, BNO leads with 13.60% vs 7.31% for EZA. On fees, EZA is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, EZA has been the lower-risk option at 10.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EZA or BNO?

Over the 10-year period, BNO has performed better with a 13.60% return vs 7.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EZA or BNO?

EZA is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for BNO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EZA or BNO?

EZA has the higher dividend yield at 6.32%, compared with 0.00% for BNO.

What is the main difference between EZA and BNO?

EZA is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while BNO is Oil & Gas. EZA tracks MSCI South Africa Index, while BNO tracks Front Month Brent Crude Oil. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for EZA and 0.90% for BNO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BNO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.