EZA vs. KSA
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI South Africa ETF (EZA) and iShares MSCI Saudi Arabia ETF (KSA).
EZA and KSA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EZA is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI South Africa Index. It was launched on Feb 7, 2003. KSA is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Saudi Arabia Investable Market Index (IMI) 25/50 Index. It was launched on Sep 16, 2015. Both EZA and KSA are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: EZA or KSA.
Correlation
The correlation between EZA and KSA is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
EZA vs. KSA - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
EZA:
0.62
KSA:
0.19
EZA:
1.01
KSA:
0.36
EZA:
1.12
KSA:
1.05
EZA:
0.44
KSA:
0.14
EZA:
2.59
KSA:
0.46
EZA:
5.85%
KSA:
5.55%
EZA:
24.44%
KSA:
13.45%
EZA:
-64.64%
KSA:
-40.56%
EZA:
-16.76%
KSA:
-14.11%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EZA achieves a 11.76% return, which is significantly higher than KSA's -0.84% return.
EZA
11.76%
-3.10%
3.88%
13.06%
2.11%
0.72%
KSA
-0.84%
-0.27%
0.87%
2.16%
7.95%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EZA vs. KSA - Expense Ratio Comparison
EZA has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than KSA's 0.74% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
EZA vs. KSA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI South Africa ETF (EZA) and iShares MSCI Saudi Arabia ETF (KSA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
EZA vs. KSA - Dividend Comparison
EZA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.96%, more than KSA's 2.66% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EZA iShares MSCI South Africa ETF | 6.96% | 2.84% | 3.90% | 2.05% | 5.51% | 12.27% | 3.81% | 1.55% | 4.10% | 3.03% | 2.20% | 2.44% |
KSA iShares MSCI Saudi Arabia ETF | 2.66% | 2.44% | 1.93% | 1.58% | 1.76% | 2.15% | 2.51% | 2.30% | 3.06% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
EZA vs. KSA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EZA drawdown since its inception was -64.64%, which is greater than KSA's maximum drawdown of -40.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EZA and KSA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
EZA vs. KSA - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI South Africa ETF (EZA) has a higher volatility of 6.60% compared to iShares MSCI Saudi Arabia ETF (KSA) at 3.92%. This indicates that EZA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KSA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.