PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EZA vs. KSA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EZA vs. KSA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI South Africa ETF (EZA) and iShares MSCI Saudi Arabia ETF (KSA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EZA achieves a -0.36% return, which is significantly lower than KSA's 6.32% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with EZA having a 7.55% annualized return and KSA not far ahead at 7.60%.


EZA

1D
1.38%
1M
0.51%
YTD
-0.36%
6M
8.72%
1Y
37.34%
3Y*
27.55%
5Y*
9.58%
10Y*
7.55%

KSA

1D
1.71%
1M
-1.53%
YTD
6.32%
6M
5.94%
1Y
4.45%
3Y*
0.95%
5Y*
2.27%
10Y*
7.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EZA vs. KSA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EZA
iShares MSCI South Africa ETF
-0.36%75.20%7.16%1.51%-5.18%7.91%-5.19%9.83%-25.24%36.03%
KSA
iShares MSCI Saudi Arabia ETF
6.32%-8.20%-0.19%15.05%-6.06%33.62%2.65%9.30%13.07%6.14%

Correlation

The correlation between EZA and KSA is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2015

0.37

EZA vs. KSA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EZA
KSA

Basic Materials

39.7%
13.3%

Financial Services

32.1%
39.7%

Consumer Cyclical

14.7%
2.3%

Communication Services

6.7%
8.2%

Consumer Defensive

2.4%
3.8%

Real Estate

1.6%
3.5%

Industrials

1.5%
4.4%

Healthcare

1.2%
4.3%

Energy

-

13.0%

Technology

-

2.2%

Utilities

-

4.6%

Basic Materials

EZA
39.7%
KSA
13.3%

Financial Services

EZA
32.1%
KSA
39.7%

Consumer Cyclical

EZA
14.7%
KSA
2.3%

Communication Services

EZA
6.7%
KSA
8.2%

Consumer Defensive

EZA
2.4%
KSA
3.8%

Real Estate

EZA
1.6%
KSA
3.5%

Industrials

EZA
1.5%
KSA
4.4%

Healthcare

EZA
1.2%
KSA
4.3%

Energy

EZA

-

KSA
13.0%

Technology

EZA

-

KSA
2.2%

Utilities

EZA

-

KSA
4.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EZA vs. KSA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EZA
EZA Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
EZA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EZA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
EZA Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
EZA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
EZA Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

KSA
KSA Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
KSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
KSA Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
KSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
KSA Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EZA vs. KSA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI South Africa ETF (EZA) and iShares MSCI Saudi Arabia ETF (KSA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EZAKSADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.21

0.27

+0.94

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.69

0.56

+1.13

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.06

+0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.72

0.34

+1.38

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.88

0.77

+4.11

EZA vs. KSA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EZA Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is higher than the KSA Sharpe Ratio of 0.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EZA and KSA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EZAKSADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.21

0.27

+0.94

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

0.14

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

0.38

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.29

0.31

-0.03

Drawdowns

EZA vs. KSA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EZA drawdown since its inception was -64.64%, which is greater than KSA's maximum drawdown of -40.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EZA and KSA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EZAKSADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.64%

-40.56%

-24.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.31%

-11.62%

-11.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.31%

-15.56%

-7.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.94%

-28.08%

-6.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.25%

-40.56%

-21.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.99%

-15.62%

-0.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.92%

-11.43%

-5.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.22%

5.17%

+3.05%

Volatility

EZA vs. KSA - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI South Africa ETF (EZA) has a higher volatility of 10.43% compared to iShares MSCI Saudi Arabia ETF (KSA) at 3.78%. This indicates that EZA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KSA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EZAKSADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.43%

3.78%

+6.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.07%

12.18%

+13.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.99%

16.63%

+14.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.70%

15.87%

+12.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.37%

20.04%

+11.33%

EZA vs. KSA - Expense Ratio Comparison

EZA has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than KSA's 0.74% expense ratio.


Dividends

EZA vs. KSA - Dividend Comparison

EZA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.18%, more than KSA's 2.77% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EZA
iShares MSCI South Africa ETF
6.18%6.16%7.26%2.84%3.90%2.05%5.51%12.27%3.81%1.55%4.10%3.03%
KSA
iShares MSCI Saudi Arabia ETF
2.77%2.95%3.44%2.44%1.93%1.58%1.76%2.15%2.51%2.30%3.05%0.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


EZA and KSA have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EZA has higher volatility (10.43%) compared to KSA (3.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EZA dropped -64.64% vs KSA's -40.56%.

On 10-year performance, KSA leads with 7.60% vs 7.55% for EZA. On fees, EZA is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, KSA has been the lower-risk option at 3.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, KSA has performed better with a 7.60% return vs 7.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EZA is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for KSA.

EZA has the higher dividend yield at 6.18%, compared with 2.77% for KSA.

EZA tracks MSCI South Africa Index, while KSA tracks MSCI Saudi Arabia Investable Market Index (IMI) 25/50 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for EZA and 0.74% for KSA.

EZA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.21 vs 0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EZA and KSA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer