PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EZA vs. INDA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EZA vs. INDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI South Africa ETF (EZA) and iShares MSCI India ETF (INDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EZA achieves a -0.36% return, which is significantly higher than INDA's -11.14% return. Over the past 10 years, EZA has outperformed INDA with an annualized return of 7.55%, while INDA has yielded a comparatively lower 6.71% annualized return.


EZA

1D
1.38%
1M
0.51%
YTD
-0.36%
6M
8.72%
1Y
37.34%
3Y*
27.55%
5Y*
9.58%
10Y*
7.55%

INDA

1D
0.08%
1M
-2.22%
YTD
-11.14%
6M
-10.86%
1Y
-11.94%
3Y*
4.66%
5Y*
2.79%
10Y*
6.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EZA vs. INDA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EZA
iShares MSCI South Africa ETF
-0.36%75.20%7.16%1.51%-5.18%7.91%-5.19%9.83%-25.24%36.03%
INDA
iShares MSCI India ETF
-11.14%2.68%8.63%17.16%-8.94%21.36%14.83%6.49%-6.67%36.08%

Correlation

The correlation between EZA and INDA is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2012

0.54

The correlation between EZA and INDA shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (3 years) to 0.54 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EZA vs. INDA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EZA
INDA

Basic Materials

39.7%
8.0%

Financial Services

32.1%
28.4%

Consumer Cyclical

14.7%
12.5%

Communication Services

6.7%
4.7%

Consumer Defensive

2.4%
6.2%

Real Estate

1.6%
1.4%

Industrials

1.5%
10.3%

Healthcare

1.2%
6.2%

Energy

-

9.5%

Technology

-

8.3%

Utilities

-

4.6%

Basic Materials

EZA
39.7%
INDA
8.0%

Financial Services

EZA
32.1%
INDA
28.4%

Consumer Cyclical

EZA
14.7%
INDA
12.5%

Communication Services

EZA
6.7%
INDA
4.7%

Consumer Defensive

EZA
2.4%
INDA
6.2%

Real Estate

EZA
1.6%
INDA
1.4%

Industrials

EZA
1.5%
INDA
10.3%

Healthcare

EZA
1.2%
INDA
6.2%

Energy

EZA

-

INDA
9.5%

Technology

EZA

-

INDA
8.3%

Utilities

EZA

-

INDA
4.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EZA vs. INDA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EZA
EZA Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
EZA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EZA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
EZA Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
EZA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
EZA Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

INDA
INDA Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
INDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
INDA Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
INDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
INDA Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EZA vs. INDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI South Africa ETF (EZA) and iShares MSCI India ETF (INDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EZAINDADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.21

-0.82

+2.03

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.69

-1.12

+2.81

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

0.87

+0.35

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.72

-0.62

+2.34

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.88

-1.51

+6.39

EZA vs. INDA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EZA Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is higher than the INDA Sharpe Ratio of -0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EZA and INDA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EZAINDADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.21

-0.82

+2.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

0.18

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

0.32

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.29

0.24

+0.05

Drawdowns

EZA vs. INDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EZA drawdown since its inception was -64.64%, which is greater than INDA's maximum drawdown of -45.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EZA and INDA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EZAINDADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.64%

-45.07%

-19.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.31%

-18.69%

-4.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.31%

-22.72%

-0.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.94%

-22.72%

-12.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.25%

-45.07%

-17.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.99%

-18.28%

+2.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.92%

-9.57%

-7.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.22%

7.65%

+0.57%

Volatility

EZA vs. INDA - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI South Africa ETF (EZA) has a higher volatility of 10.43% compared to iShares MSCI India ETF (INDA) at 5.17%. This indicates that EZA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EZAINDADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.43%

5.17%

+5.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.07%

12.60%

+13.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.99%

14.62%

+16.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.70%

15.36%

+13.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.37%

21.12%

+10.25%

EZA vs. INDA - Expense Ratio Comparison

EZA has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than INDA's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

EZA vs. INDA - Dividend Comparison

EZA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.18%, while INDA has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EZA
iShares MSCI South Africa ETF
6.18%6.16%7.26%2.84%3.90%2.05%5.51%12.27%3.81%1.55%4.10%3.03%
INDA
iShares MSCI India ETF
0.00%0.00%0.76%0.16%0.00%6.44%0.27%0.99%0.94%1.09%0.90%1.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


EZA and INDA have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EZA has higher volatility (10.43%) compared to INDA (5.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EZA dropped -64.64% vs INDA's -45.07%.

On 10-year performance, EZA leads with 7.55% vs 6.71% for INDA. On fees, EZA is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, INDA has been the lower-risk option at 5.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EZA has performed better with a 7.55% return vs 6.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EZA is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for INDA.

EZA has the higher dividend yield at 6.18%, compared with 0.00% for INDA.

EZA is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while INDA is Asia Pacific Equities. EZA tracks MSCI South Africa Index, while INDA tracks MSCI India Index. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for EZA and 0.69% for INDA.

EZA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.21 vs -0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EZA and INDA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer