EXUS vs. TRET.L
EXUS (Macquarie Focused International Core ETF) and TRET.L (VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EXUS is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund managed by Macquarie, while TRET.L is a REIT fund tracking the GPR Global 100 Index. Over the past year, EXUS returned 9.21% vs 18.21% for TRET.L. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EXUS charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for TRET.L.
Performance
EXUS vs. TRET.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EXUS achieves a 8.02% return, which is significantly lower than TRET.L's 11.68% return.
EXUS
- 1D
- -1.71%
- 1M
- -0.12%
- 6M
- 3.85%
- YTD
- 8.02%
- 1Y
- 9.21%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TRET.L
- 1D
- 2.03%
- 1M
- 3.97%
- 6M
- 9.00%
- YTD
- 11.68%
- 1Y
- 18.21%
- 3Y*
- 11.67%
- 5Y*
- 3.15%
- 10Y*
- 5.37%
EXUS vs. TRET.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EXUS Macquarie Focused International Core ETF | 8.02% | 3.87% |
TRET.L VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF | 11.68% | 6.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between EXUS and TRET.L is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2025 | 0.18 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EXUS vs. TRET.L — Risk / Return Rank
EXUS
TRET.L
EXUS vs. TRET.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Macquarie Focused International Core ETF (EXUS) and VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (TRET.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EXUS | TRET.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.25 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.61 | 1.73 | -1.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.13 | 5.75 | -3.62 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EXUS vs. TRET.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EXUS drawdown since its inception was -15.28%, smaller than the maximum TRET.L drawdown of -42.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EXUS and TRET.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EXUS | TRET.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.28% | -42.25% | +26.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.28% | -10.49% | -4.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.92% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.35% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.25% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.73% | 0.00% | -2.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.92% | -10.56% | +7.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.33% | 3.16% | +1.17% |
Volatility
EXUS vs. TRET.L - Volatility Comparison
Macquarie Focused International Core ETF (EXUS) has a higher volatility of 6.49% compared to VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (TRET.L) at 4.35%. This indicates that EXUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TRET.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EXUS | TRET.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.49% | 4.35% | +2.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.25% | 10.56% | +6.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.37% | 12.85% | +6.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.11% | 16.91% | +2.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.11% | 17.98% | +1.13% |
EXUS vs. TRET.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
EXUS has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than TRET.L's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
EXUS vs. TRET.L - Dividend Comparison
EXUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, less than TRET.L's 3.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EXUS Macquarie Focused International Core ETF | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TRET.L VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF | 3.25% | 3.54% | 3.56% | 3.54% | 4.55% | 1.86% | 4.18% | 3.32% | 5.03% | 3.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EXUS and TRET.L have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TRET.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TRET.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for EXUS.
EXUS is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while TRET.L is REIT. They also come from different issuers: Macquarie and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for EXUS and 0.25% for TRET.L.
Find the right allocation for EXUS and TRET.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer