EXCRX vs. MNBAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Manning & Napier Core Bond Series (EXCRX) and Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extended Term Series (MNBAX).
EXCRX is managed by Manning & Napier. It was launched on Apr 21, 2005. MNBAX is managed by Manning & Napier. It was launched on Oct 11, 1993.
Performance
EXCRX vs. MNBAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EXCRX vs. MNBAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EXCRX Manning & Napier Core Bond Series | -0.06% | 6.82% | 1.05% | 5.47% | -13.20% | -1.89% | 8.66% | 8.18% | -0.74% | 2.91% |
MNBAX Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extended Term Series | -4.33% | 10.01% | 7.16% | 13.16% | -16.70% | 11.27% | 17.65% | 19.30% | -4.31% | 14.90% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EXCRX achieves a -0.06% return, which is significantly higher than MNBAX's -4.33% return. Over the past 10 years, EXCRX has underperformed MNBAX with an annualized return of 1.58%, while MNBAX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.40% annualized return.
EXCRX
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- -1.55%
- YTD
- -0.06%
- 6M
- 0.53%
- 1Y
- 3.31%
- 3Y*
- 3.35%
- 5Y*
- -0.01%
- 10Y*
- 1.58%
MNBAX
- 1D
- 1.95%
- 1M
- -4.78%
- YTD
- -4.33%
- 6M
- -2.10%
- 1Y
- 4.75%
- 3Y*
- 6.52%
- 5Y*
- 2.69%
- 10Y*
- 6.40%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EXCRX vs. MNBAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EXCRX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than MNBAX's 1.02% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EXCRX vs. MNBAX — Risk / Return Rank
EXCRX
MNBAX
EXCRX vs. MNBAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manning & Napier Core Bond Series (EXCRX) and Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extended Term Series (MNBAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EXCRX | MNBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.85 | 0.49 | +0.36 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.22 | 0.77 | +0.46 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.10 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.29 | 0.55 | +0.74 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.59 | 2.29 | +1.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EXCRX | MNBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 | 0.49 | +0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.00 | 0.29 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 | 0.66 | -0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.72 | 0.46 | +0.26 |
Correlation
The correlation between EXCRX and MNBAX is 0.09, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
EXCRX vs. MNBAX - Dividend Comparison
EXCRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.26%, less than MNBAX's 10.60% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EXCRX Manning & Napier Core Bond Series | 4.26% | 4.18% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 2.23% | 2.28% | 5.15% | 2.01% | 2.32% | 1.94% | 2.14% | 2.45% |
MNBAX Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extended Term Series | 10.60% | 10.14% | 4.23% | 1.81% | 3.68% | 5.12% | 6.49% | 4.49% | 5.73% | 6.53% | 1.15% | 2.05% |
Drawdowns
EXCRX vs. MNBAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EXCRX drawdown since its inception was -18.70%, smaller than the maximum MNBAX drawdown of -39.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EXCRX and MNBAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EXCRX | MNBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.70% | -39.62% | +20.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.09% | -9.23% | +6.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.65% | -21.95% | +3.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.70% | -21.95% | +3.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.11% | -7.10% | +3.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.87% | -6.68% | +3.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.11% | 2.22% | -1.11% |
Volatility
EXCRX vs. MNBAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Manning & Napier Core Bond Series (EXCRX) is 1.79%, while Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extended Term Series (MNBAX) has a volatility of 4.08%. This indicates that EXCRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MNBAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EXCRX | MNBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.79% | 4.08% | -2.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.73% | 6.55% | -3.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.60% | 10.45% | -5.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.87% | 9.42% | -3.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.83% | 9.68% | -4.85% |