EXBAX vs. FRGAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Moderate Term Series (EXBAX) and Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund (FRGAX).
EXBAX is managed by Manning & Napier. It was launched on Sep 14, 1993. FRGAX is an actively managed fund by Fidelity. It was launched on Jan 1, 2022.
Performance
EXBAX vs. FRGAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EXBAX vs. FRGAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EXBAX Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Moderate Term Series | -4.84% | 9.29% | 6.11% | 11.13% | -0.36% |
FRGAX Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund | -3.53% | 17.10% | 12.91% | 17.57% | -1.63% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EXBAX achieves a -4.84% return, which is significantly lower than FRGAX's -3.53% return.
EXBAX
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- -5.88%
- YTD
- -4.84%
- 6M
- -2.61%
- 1Y
- 3.33%
- 3Y*
- 5.40%
- 5Y*
- 2.19%
- 10Y*
- 5.08%
FRGAX
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- -6.67%
- YTD
- -3.53%
- 6M
- -1.21%
- 1Y
- 13.49%
- 3Y*
- 12.30%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EXBAX vs. FRGAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EXBAX has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than FRGAX's 0.02% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EXBAX vs. FRGAX — Risk / Return Rank
EXBAX
FRGAX
EXBAX vs. FRGAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Moderate Term Series (EXBAX) and Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund (FRGAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EXBAX | FRGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.43 | 1.15 | -0.72 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.66 | 1.67 | -1.01 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.25 | -0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.38 | 1.41 | -1.03 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.69 | 6.55 | -4.86 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EXBAX | FRGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 | 1.15 | -0.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 1.21 | -0.76 |
Correlation
The correlation between EXBAX and FRGAX is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
EXBAX vs. FRGAX - Dividend Comparison
EXBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.06%, more than FRGAX's 2.08% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EXBAX Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Moderate Term Series | 6.06% | 5.77% | 4.57% | 2.27% | 0.99% | 6.67% | 6.31% | 4.83% | 5.08% | 6.09% | 1.81% | 0.58% |
FRGAX Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund | 2.08% | 2.00% | 2.01% | 1.77% | 1.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
EXBAX vs. FRGAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EXBAX drawdown since its inception was -29.86%, which is greater than FRGAX's maximum drawdown of -11.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EXBAX and FRGAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EXBAX | FRGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.86% | -11.77% | -18.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.37% | -8.53% | +1.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.23% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.23% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.96% | -7.03% | +0.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.07% | -1.62% | -3.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.67% | 1.87% | -0.20% |
Volatility
EXBAX vs. FRGAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Moderate Term Series (EXBAX) is 2.98%, while Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund (FRGAX) has a volatility of 3.78%. This indicates that EXBAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FRGAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EXBAX | FRGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.98% | 3.78% | -0.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.03% | 6.72% | -1.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.91% | 11.92% | -4.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.50% | 10.27% | -2.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.60% | 10.27% | -2.67% |