PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EWZS vs. VEA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EWZS vs. VEA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Brazil Small-Cap ETF (EWZS) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EWZS achieves a 4.95% return, which is significantly lower than VEA's 14.92% return. Over the past 10 years, EWZS has underperformed VEA with an annualized return of 7.86%, while VEA has yielded a comparatively higher 10.17% annualized return.


EWZS

1D
-4.37%
1M
-8.19%
YTD
4.95%
6M
-2.70%
1Y
8.41%
3Y*
2.41%
5Y*
-4.16%
10Y*
7.86%

VEA

1D
-0.90%
1M
5.54%
YTD
14.92%
6M
18.15%
1Y
32.48%
3Y*
19.77%
5Y*
9.60%
10Y*
10.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EWZS vs. VEA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EWZS
iShares MSCI Brazil Small-Cap ETF
4.95%45.18%-35.95%32.65%-11.20%-14.09%-20.86%50.60%-7.13%54.18%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
14.92%35.16%3.15%17.93%-15.34%11.66%9.71%22.62%-14.75%26.42%

Correlation

The correlation between EWZS and VEA is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2010

0.52

The correlation between EWZS and VEA shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (5 years) to 0.63 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EWZS vs. VEA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EWZS
VEA

Basic Materials

16.5%
7.5%

Consumer Cyclical

15.5%
7.5%

Real Estate

13.4%
2.7%

Utilities

12.1%
3.3%

Consumer Defensive

10.9%
5.6%

Financial Services

10.4%
23.3%

Industrials

8.6%
19.2%

Energy

4.8%
5.4%

Healthcare

4.8%
8.2%

Technology

3.0%
13.8%

Communication Services

-

3.4%

Basic Materials

EWZS
16.5%
VEA
7.5%

Consumer Cyclical

EWZS
15.5%
VEA
7.5%

Real Estate

EWZS
13.4%
VEA
2.7%

Utilities

EWZS
12.1%
VEA
3.3%

Consumer Defensive

EWZS
10.9%
VEA
5.6%

Financial Services

EWZS
10.4%
VEA
23.3%

Industrials

EWZS
8.6%
VEA
19.2%

Energy

EWZS
4.8%
VEA
5.4%

Healthcare

EWZS
4.8%
VEA
8.2%

Technology

EWZS
3.0%
VEA
13.8%

Communication Services

EWZS

-

VEA
3.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EWZS vs. VEA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EWZS
EWZS Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
EWZS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWZS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWZS Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
EWZS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWZS Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

VEA
VEA Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
VEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEA Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
VEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEA Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EWZS vs. VEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Brazil Small-Cap ETF (EWZS) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EWZSVEADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.38

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.50

2.81

-2.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.24

10.94

-9.70

EWZS vs. VEA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWZS Sharpe Ratio is 0.28, which is lower than the VEA Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWZS and VEA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EWZSVEADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

2.09

-1.81

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.13

0.58

-0.71

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

0.59

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.03

0.25

-0.28

Drawdowns

EWZS vs. VEA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWZS drawdown since its inception was -79.23%, which is greater than VEA's maximum drawdown of -60.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWZS and VEA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EWZSVEADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.23%

-60.68%

-18.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.05%

-11.63%

-5.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.55%

-13.45%

-24.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.78%

-29.71%

-19.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.15%

-35.73%

-27.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-30.99%

-0.90%

-30.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.57%

-13.29%

-23.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.79%

2.98%

+3.81%

Volatility

EWZS vs. VEA - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Brazil Small-Cap ETF (EWZS) has a higher volatility of 11.03% compared to Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) at 5.66%. This indicates that EWZS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VEA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EWZSVEADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.03%

5.66%

+5.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.56%

13.32%

+12.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.44%

15.66%

+14.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.12%

16.55%

+16.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.79%

17.36%

+19.43%

EWZS vs. VEA - Expense Ratio Comparison

EWZS has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than VEA's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

EWZS vs. VEA - Dividend Comparison

EWZS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.69%, more than VEA's 2.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EWZS
iShares MSCI Brazil Small-Cap ETF
3.69%3.88%4.93%2.75%4.61%4.51%1.15%1.77%4.35%3.41%3.62%4.35%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
2.62%3.22%3.35%3.15%2.91%3.16%2.04%3.04%3.35%2.77%3.05%2.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


EWZS and VEA have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EWZS has higher volatility (11.03%) compared to VEA (5.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWZS dropped -79.23% vs VEA's -60.68%.

On 10-year performance, VEA leads with 10.17% vs 7.86% for EWZS. On fees, VEA is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VEA has been the lower-risk option at 5.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VEA has performed better with a 10.17% return vs 7.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VEA is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for EWZS.

EWZS has the higher dividend yield at 3.69%, compared with 2.62% for VEA.

EWZS is categorized as Latin America Equities, while VEA is Foreign Large Cap Equities. EWZS tracks MSCI Brazil Small Cap Index, while VEA tracks FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for EWZS and 0.03% for VEA.

VEA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EWZS and VEA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer