EWZ vs. FLKR

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

EWZ (iShares MSCI Brazil ETF) and FLKR (Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EWZ is a Latin America Equities fund tracking the MSCI Brazil 25/50 Index, while FLKR is a South Korea Equities fund tracking the FTSE South Korea RIC Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EWZ returned 6.56%/yr vs 17.20%/yr for FLKR. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EWZ charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for FLKR.

Performance

EWZ vs. FLKR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Brazil ETF (EWZ) and Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EWZ achieves a 14.17% return, which is significantly lower than FLKR's 88.17% return.

EWZ

• 1D: 2.77%
• 1M: 4.20%
• 6M: 9.71%
• YTD: 14.17%
• 1Y: 36.37%
• 3Y*: 10.52%
• 5Y*: 6.56%
• 10Y*: 6.86%

FLKR

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: -5.67%
• 6M: 69.24%
• YTD: 88.17%
• 1Y: 153.09%
• 3Y*: 45.44%
• 5Y*: 17.20%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EWZ vs. FLKR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EWZ iShares MSCI Brazil ETF	14.17%	48.81%	-30.41%	32.62%	12.09%	-17.32%	-20.35%	27.67%	-2.52%	4.00%
FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF	88.17%	91.91%	-18.84%	19.16%	-27.50%	-7.54%	42.64%	8.88%	-21.30%	3.00%

Correlation

The correlation between EWZ and FLKR is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.45
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.44
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.41
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017	0.44

EWZ vs. FLKR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EWZ	FLKR
Financial Services	33.4%	7.4%
Energy	16.7%	0.7%
Basic Materials	15.3%	1.9%
Utilities	12.8%	0.3%
Industrials	11.0%	14.6%
Consumer Defensive	4.6%	1.4%
Healthcare	2.3%	2.4%
Communication Services	2.1%	2.0%
Consumer Cyclical	1.4%	6.3%
Technology	0.4%	62.9%
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

EWZ vs. FLKR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EWZ

EWZ Risk / Return Rank: 47
EWZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
EWZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
EWZ Omega Ratio Rank: 48
EWZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
EWZ Martin Ratio Rank: 39

FLKR

FLKR Risk / Return Rank: 92
FLKR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
FLKR Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
FLKR Omega Ratio Rank: 90
FLKR Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
FLKR Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EWZ vs. FLKR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Brazil ETF (EWZ) and Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EWZ	FLKR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.43	3.07	-1.64
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.96	3.16	-1.19
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.47	-0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.85	6.61	-4.77
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.94	20.76	-15.83

EWZ vs. FLKR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is lower than the FLKR Sharpe Ratio of 3.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWZ and FLKR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EWZ vs. FLKR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWZ drawdown since its inception was -77.25%, which is greater than FLKR's maximum drawdown of -50.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWZ and FLKR.

Drawdown Indicators

	EWZ	FLKR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-77.25%	-50.06%	-27.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.27%	-23.03%	+3.76%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-31.36%	-26.39%	-4.97%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.24%	-48.14%	+15.90%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-56.99%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-20.49%	-16.53%	-3.96%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-35.90%	-21.93%	-13.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.20%	7.32%	-0.12%

Volatility

EWZ vs. FLKR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Brazil ETF (EWZ) is 5.74%, while Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) has a volatility of 24.66%. This indicates that EWZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLKR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EWZ	FLKR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.74%	24.66%	-18.92%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.70%	46.71%	-27.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.98%	49.65%	-24.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.60%	30.98%	-3.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.90%	29.12%	+4.78%

EWZ vs. FLKR - Expense Ratio Comparison

EWZ has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than FLKR's 0.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

EWZ vs. FLKR - Dividend Comparison

EWZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.07%, more than FLKR's 2.45% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EWZ iShares MSCI Brazil ETF	4.07%	5.19%	8.91%	5.66%	12.59%	9.87%	1.71%	2.54%	2.89%	1.71%	1.81%	4.08%
FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF	2.45%	3.87%	7.08%	2.28%	3.13%	2.12%	0.99%	2.09%	1.86%	1.02%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EWZ and FLKR in my portfolio?

EWZ and FLKR have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EWZ or FLKR?

FLKR has higher volatility (24.66%) compared to EWZ (5.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWZ dropped -77.25% vs FLKR's -50.06%.

Which ETF is better, EWZ or FLKR?

On 5-year performance, FLKR leads with 17.20% vs 6.56% for EWZ. On fees, FLKR is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, EWZ has been the lower-risk option at 5.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EWZ or FLKR?

Over the 5-year period, FLKR has performed better with a 17.20% return vs 6.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EWZ or FLKR?

FLKR is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for EWZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EWZ or FLKR?

EWZ has the higher dividend yield at 4.07%, compared with 2.45% for FLKR.

What is the main difference between EWZ and FLKR?

EWZ is categorized as Latin America Equities, while FLKR is South Korea Equities. EWZ tracks MSCI Brazil 25/50 Index, while FLKR tracks FTSE South Korea RIC Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for EWZ and 0.09% for FLKR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLKR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.07 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.