PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EWY vs. XLY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EWY vs. XLY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY) and Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EWY achieves a 67.52% return, which is significantly higher than XLY's -3.64% return. Over the past 10 years, EWY has outperformed XLY with an annualized return of 13.73%, while XLY has yielded a comparatively lower 12.04% annualized return.


EWY

1D
0.20%
1M
-25.70%
6M
45.13%
YTD
67.52%
1Y
130.03%
3Y*
38.38%
5Y*
15.11%
10Y*
13.73%
ALL TIME*
9.80%

XLY

1D
-0.72%
1M
-1.98%
6M
-5.91%
YTD
-3.64%
1Y
3.97%
3Y*
11.17%
5Y*
5.72%
10Y*
12.04%
ALL TIME*
9.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EWY vs. XLY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EWY
iShares MSCI South Korea ETF
67.52%95.33%-20.48%19.05%-26.59%-7.58%39.43%7.97%-20.37%44.97%
XLY
Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund
-3.64%7.37%26.51%39.64%-36.27%27.93%29.63%28.39%1.58%22.82%

Correlation

The correlation between EWY and XLY is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2000

0.52

The correlation between EWY and XLY shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (1 year) to 0.53 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EWY vs. XLY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EWY
XLY

Technology

56.1%
1.0%

Industrials

14.6%
0.1%

Financial Services

11.3%

-

Consumer Cyclical

5.9%
97.1%

Healthcare

3.3%

-

Communication Services

2.6%
1.8%

Basic Materials

2.2%

-

Consumer Defensive

2.1%

-

Energy

0.8%

-

Utilities

0.3%

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

EWY
56.1%
XLY
1.0%

Industrials

EWY
14.6%
XLY
0.1%

Financial Services

EWY
11.3%
XLY

-

Consumer Cyclical

EWY
5.9%
XLY
97.1%

Healthcare

EWY
3.3%
XLY

-

Communication Services

EWY
2.6%
XLY
1.8%

Basic Materials

EWY
2.2%
XLY

-

Consumer Defensive

EWY
2.1%
XLY

-

Energy

EWY
0.8%
XLY

-

Utilities

EWY
0.3%
XLY

-

Real Estate

EWY

-

XLY

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EWY vs. XLY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EWY
EWY Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
EWY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWY Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
EWY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWY Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

XLY
XLY Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
XLY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLY Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
XLY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLY Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EWY vs. XLY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY) and Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EWYXLYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.05

+0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.06

0.27

+4.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.04

0.76

+15.28

EWY vs. XLY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWY Sharpe Ratio is 2.53, which is higher than the XLY Sharpe Ratio of 0.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWY and XLY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EWY vs. XLY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWY drawdown since its inception was -74.14%, which is greater than XLY's maximum drawdown of -59.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWY and XLY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EWYXLYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.14%

-59.05%

-15.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.85%

-14.98%

-10.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.36%

-26.01%

-1.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.15%

-39.67%

-7.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.73%

-39.67%

-10.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.70%

-7.59%

-18.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.09%

-9.54%

-10.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.14%

5.25%

+2.89%

Volatility

EWY vs. XLY - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY) has a higher volatility of 22.94% compared to Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY) at 5.47%. This indicates that EWY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EWYXLYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.94%

5.47%

+17.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

48.48%

14.15%

+34.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

51.71%

18.74%

+32.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.91%

23.95%

+7.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.90%

22.10%

+6.80%

EWY vs. XLY - Expense Ratio Comparison

EWY has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than XLY's 0.13% expense ratio.


Dividends

EWY vs. XLY - Dividend Comparison

EWY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%, more than XLY's 0.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EWY
iShares MSCI South Korea ETF
1.25%2.10%2.55%2.52%1.23%2.16%0.73%2.10%1.34%2.90%1.21%2.42%
XLY
Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund
0.79%0.79%0.72%0.78%1.00%0.53%0.82%1.28%1.34%1.20%1.71%1.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


EWY and XLY have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EWY has higher volatility (22.94%) compared to XLY (5.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWY dropped -74.14% vs XLY's -59.05%.

On 10-year performance, EWY leads with 13.73% vs 12.04% for XLY. On fees, XLY is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, XLY has been the lower-risk option at 5.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EWY has performed better with a 13.73% return vs 12.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLY is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for EWY.

EWY has the higher dividend yield at 1.25%, compared with 0.79% for XLY.

EWY is categorized as South Korea Equities, while XLY is Consumer Discretionary Equities. EWY tracks MSCI Korea Index, while XLY tracks Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for EWY and 0.13% for XLY.

EWY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EWY and XLY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer