EWW vs. EFV
EWW (iShares MSCI Mexico ETF) and EFV (iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EWW is a Latin America Equities fund tracking the MSCI Mexico IMI 25/50 Index, while EFV is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE Value Index (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EWW returned 7.89%/yr vs 10.55%/yr for EFV. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EWW charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.31%/yr for EFV.
Performance
EWW vs. EFV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EWW achieves a 13.18% return, which is significantly higher than EFV's 10.56% return. Over the past 10 years, EWW has underperformed EFV with an annualized return of 7.89%, while EFV has yielded a comparatively higher 10.55% annualized return.
EWW
- 1D
- 1.46%
- 1M
- -2.24%
- YTD
- 13.18%
- 6M
- 13.14%
- 1Y
- 32.24%
- 3Y*
- 10.87%
- 5Y*
- 13.02%
- 10Y*
- 7.89%
EFV
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- 0.52%
- YTD
- 10.56%
- 6M
- 12.39%
- 1Y
- 27.62%
- 3Y*
- 21.79%
- 5Y*
- 12.36%
- 10Y*
- 10.55%
EWW vs. EFV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWW iShares MSCI Mexico ETF | 13.18% | 53.65% | -28.22% | 40.32% | 1.24% | 20.27% | -3.06% | 12.64% | -14.58% | 14.47% |
EFV iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF | 10.56% | 42.22% | 5.35% | 18.85% | -5.22% | 11.08% | -2.97% | 15.80% | -14.67% | 21.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between EWW and EFV is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 2005 | 0.67 |
The correlation between EWW and EFV shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (3 years) to 0.67 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
EWW vs. EFV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EWW
EFV
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Financial Services
Industrials
Communication Services
Real Estate
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Energy
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Defensive
EWW
EFV
Basic Materials
EWW
EFV
Financial Services
EWW
EFV
Industrials
EWW
EFV
Communication Services
EWW
EFV
Real Estate
EWW
EFV
Consumer Cyclical
EWW
EFV
Healthcare
EWW
EFV
Energy
EWW
-
EFV
Technology
EWW
-
EFV
Utilities
EWW
-
EFV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EWW vs. EFV — Risk / Return Rank
EWW
EFV
EWW vs. EFV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Mexico ETF (EWW) and iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF (EFV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EWW | EFV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.34 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.32 | 2.55 | -0.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.25 | 9.40 | -1.15 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EWW vs. EFV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EWW drawdown since its inception was -64.94%, roughly equal to the maximum EFV drawdown of -63.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWW and EFV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EWW | EFV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.94% | -63.94% | -1.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.98% | -10.90% | -3.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.17% | -13.72% | -17.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.17% | -25.84% | -5.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.62% | -43.16% | -10.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.40% | -1.24% | -2.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.51% | -14.81% | -3.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.93% | 2.96% | +0.97% |
Volatility
EWW vs. EFV - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Mexico ETF (EWW) has a higher volatility of 6.96% compared to iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF (EFV) at 4.62%. This indicates that EWW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EFV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EWW | EFV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.96% | 4.62% | +2.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.46% | 11.98% | +6.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.76% | 14.58% | +7.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.58% | 16.02% | +6.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.39% | 17.85% | +7.54% |
EWW vs. EFV - Expense Ratio Comparison
EWW has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than EFV's 0.31% expense ratio.
Dividends
EWW vs. EFV - Dividend Comparison
EWW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.07%, less than EFV's 3.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFV iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF | 3.76% | 4.16% | 4.66% | 4.36% | 4.17% | 4.07% | 2.42% | 4.62% | 4.56% | 3.56% | 3.28% | 3.59% |
EWW iShares MSCI Mexico ETF | 3.07% | 3.48% | 4.39% | 2.19% | 3.64% | 2.06% | 1.43% | 2.92% | 2.30% | 2.22% | 1.77% | 2.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EWW and EFV have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EWW has higher volatility (6.96%) compared to EFV (4.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWW dropped -64.94% vs EFV's -63.94%.
On 10-year performance, EFV leads with 10.55% vs 7.89% for EWW. On fees, EFV is cheaper at 0.31% per year. On volatility, EFV has been the lower-risk option at 4.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EFV has performed better with a 10.55% return vs 7.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EFV is cheaper with a 0.31% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for EWW.
EFV has the higher dividend yield at 3.76%, compared with 3.07% for EWW.
EWW is categorized as Latin America Equities, while EFV is Foreign Large Cap Equities. EWW tracks MSCI Mexico IMI 25/50 Index, while EFV tracks MSCI EAFE Value Index (Net). Their fees differ too: 0.49% for EWW and 0.31% for EFV.
EFV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EWW and EFV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer