PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EWU vs. FLCA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EWU vs. FLCA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI United Kingdom ETF (EWU) and Franklin FTSE Canada ETF (FLCA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EWU achieves a 5.57% return, which is significantly lower than FLCA's 7.39% return.


EWU

1D
0.11%
1M
-0.58%
YTD
5.57%
6M
9.86%
1Y
19.69%
3Y*
16.92%
5Y*
10.75%
10Y*
8.18%

FLCA

1D
0.03%
1M
-0.26%
YTD
7.39%
6M
10.52%
1Y
28.43%
3Y*
21.47%
5Y*
11.54%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EWU vs. FLCA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EWU
iShares MSCI United Kingdom ETF
5.57%34.95%6.74%12.40%-4.39%18.19%-11.80%21.29%-14.30%4.72%
FLCA
Franklin FTSE Canada ETF
7.39%34.62%13.02%14.71%-11.93%28.67%6.31%28.42%-15.55%2.65%

Correlation

The correlation between EWU and FLCA is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017

0.72

The correlation between EWU and FLCA shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.75 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EWU vs. FLCA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EWU
FLCA

Financial Services

26.6%
38.7%

Healthcare

13.9%

-

Consumer Defensive

13.9%
2.9%

Industrials

12.7%
10.4%

Energy

11.1%
17.4%

Basic Materials

9.1%
16.0%

Utilities

4.9%
2.2%

Consumer Cyclical

3.6%
3.3%

Communication Services

2.2%
0.5%

Technology

0.6%
8.3%

Real Estate

0.6%
0.2%

Financial Services

EWU
26.6%
FLCA
38.7%

Healthcare

EWU
13.9%
FLCA

-

Consumer Defensive

EWU
13.9%
FLCA
2.9%

Industrials

EWU
12.7%
FLCA
10.4%

Energy

EWU
11.1%
FLCA
17.4%

Basic Materials

EWU
9.1%
FLCA
16.0%

Utilities

EWU
4.9%
FLCA
2.2%

Consumer Cyclical

EWU
3.6%
FLCA
3.3%

Communication Services

EWU
2.2%
FLCA
0.5%

Technology

EWU
0.6%
FLCA
8.3%

Real Estate

EWU
0.6%
FLCA
0.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EWU vs. FLCA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EWU
EWU Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
EWU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWU Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWU Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
EWU Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWU Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

FLCA
FLCA Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
FLCA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLCA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLCA Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
FLCA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLCA Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EWU vs. FLCA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI United Kingdom ETF (EWU) and Franklin FTSE Canada ETF (FLCA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EWUFLCADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.35

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.99

3.34

-1.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.12

13.55

-6.43

EWU vs. FLCA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWU Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is lower than the FLCA Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWU and FLCA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EWUFLCADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.37

2.01

-0.64

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

0.69

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

0.60

-0.33

Drawdowns

EWU vs. FLCA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWU drawdown since its inception was -63.99%, which is greater than FLCA's maximum drawdown of -41.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWU and FLCA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EWUFLCADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.99%

-41.51%

-22.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.92%

-8.55%

-1.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.63%

-12.58%

-0.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.91%

-24.23%

-0.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.62%

-2.52%

-2.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.16%

-5.90%

-8.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.77%

2.10%

+0.67%

Volatility

EWU vs. FLCA - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI United Kingdom ETF (EWU) has a higher volatility of 4.68% compared to Franklin FTSE Canada ETF (FLCA) at 4.42%. This indicates that EWU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLCA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EWUFLCADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.68%

4.42%

+0.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.35%

11.46%

+0.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.47%

14.25%

+0.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.44%

16.76%

-0.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.85%

19.06%

-0.21%

EWU vs. FLCA - Expense Ratio Comparison

EWU has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than FLCA's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

EWU vs. FLCA - Dividend Comparison

EWU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.53%, more than FLCA's 1.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EWU
iShares MSCI United Kingdom ETF
3.53%3.73%4.16%4.14%3.43%4.35%2.48%4.13%4.98%3.91%3.97%4.11%
FLCA
Franklin FTSE Canada ETF
1.73%1.85%2.50%2.49%2.20%2.02%2.49%2.29%3.03%0.09%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EWU and FLCA have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EWU has higher volatility (4.68%) compared to FLCA (4.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWU dropped -63.99% vs FLCA's -41.51%.

On 5-year performance, FLCA leads with 11.54% vs 10.75% for EWU. On fees, FLCA is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, FLCA has been the lower-risk option at 4.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FLCA has performed better with a 11.54% return vs 10.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLCA is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for EWU.

EWU has the higher dividend yield at 3.53%, compared with 1.73% for FLCA.

EWU is categorized as Europe Equities, while FLCA is Canada Equities. EWU tracks MSCI United Kingdom Index, while FLCA tracks FTSE Canada RIC Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for EWU and 0.09% for FLCA.

FLCA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EWU and FLCA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer