EWS vs. IOO
EWS (iShares MSCI Singapore ETF) and IOO (iShares Global 100 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EWS is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Singapore Index, while IOO is a Global Equities fund tracking the S&P Global 100 Index (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EWS returned 7.98%/yr vs 16.85%/yr for IOO. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EWS charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for IOO.
Performance
EWS vs. IOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EWS achieves a 8.98% return, which is significantly lower than IOO's 13.77% return. Over the past 10 years, EWS has underperformed IOO with an annualized return of 7.98%, while IOO has yielded a comparatively higher 16.85% annualized return.
EWS
- 1D
- 0.94%
- 1M
- 3.67%
- YTD
- 8.98%
- 6M
- 8.94%
- 1Y
- 20.16%
- 3Y*
- 22.15%
- 5Y*
- 9.76%
- 10Y*
- 7.98%
IOO
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 6.03%
- YTD
- 13.77%
- 6M
- 13.90%
- 1Y
- 40.81%
- 3Y*
- 26.04%
- 5Y*
- 17.21%
- 10Y*
- 16.85%
EWS vs. IOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWS iShares MSCI Singapore ETF | 8.98% | 31.35% | 22.10% | 6.15% | -9.80% | 5.47% | -8.47% | 14.54% | -11.34% | 34.78% |
IOO iShares Global 100 ETF | 13.77% | 27.02% | 26.54% | 27.71% | -16.34% | 26.03% | 18.61% | 30.01% | -6.22% | 23.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between EWS and IOO is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2000 | 0.63 |
The correlation between EWS and IOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.
EWS vs. IOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EWS
IOO
Financial Services
Industrials
Real Estate
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
EWS
IOO
Industrials
EWS
IOO
Real Estate
EWS
IOO
Utilities
EWS
IOO
Consumer Defensive
EWS
IOO
Communication Services
EWS
IOO
Technology
EWS
IOO
Consumer Cyclical
EWS
IOO
Basic Materials
EWS
-
IOO
Energy
EWS
-
IOO
Healthcare
EWS
-
IOO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EWS vs. IOO — Risk / Return Rank
EWS
IOO
EWS vs. IOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Singapore ETF (EWS) and iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EWS | IOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.38 | 3.05 | -1.67 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.03 | 4.11 | -2.08 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.54 | -0.30 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.75 | 4.19 | -1.43 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.72 | 19.49 | -12.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EWS | IOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.38 | 3.05 | -1.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 | 1.02 | -0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 | 0.95 | -0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.15 | 0.40 | -0.25 |
Drawdowns
EWS vs. IOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EWS drawdown since its inception was -75.00%, which is greater than IOO's maximum drawdown of -55.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWS and IOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EWS | IOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.00% | -55.85% | -19.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.82% | -9.94% | +2.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.34% | -19.19% | +2.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.06% | -23.52% | -5.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.84% | -31.43% | -9.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.88% | -11.27% | -10.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.20% | 2.14% | +1.06% |
Volatility
EWS vs. IOO - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Singapore ETF (EWS) has a higher volatility of 4.01% compared to iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO) at 3.59%. This indicates that EWS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EWS | IOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.01% | 3.59% | +0.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.52% | 10.50% | +1.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.75% | 13.47% | +1.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.25% | 17.03% | +0.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.03% | 17.77% | +0.26% |
EWS vs. IOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
EWS has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than IOO's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
EWS vs. IOO - Dividend Comparison
EWS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.76%, more than IOO's 0.81% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWS iShares MSCI Singapore ETF | 3.76% | 4.10% | 4.28% | 6.50% | 2.56% | 6.00% | 2.68% | 4.70% | 4.21% | 3.46% | 3.96% | 4.20% |
IOO iShares Global 100 ETF | 0.81% | 0.92% | 1.08% | 1.49% | 2.00% | 1.53% | 1.49% | 2.02% | 2.54% | 2.23% | 2.75% | 2.89% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EWS and IOO have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EWS has higher volatility (4.01%) compared to IOO (3.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWS dropped -75.00% vs IOO's -55.85%.
On 10-year performance, IOO leads with 16.85% vs 7.98% for EWS. On fees, IOO is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, IOO has been the lower-risk option at 3.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IOO has performed better with a 16.85% return vs 7.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IOO is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for EWS.
EWS has the higher dividend yield at 3.76%, compared with 0.81% for IOO.
EWS is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while IOO is Global Equities. EWS tracks MSCI Singapore Index, while IOO tracks S&P Global 100 Index (Net). Their fees differ too: 0.50% for EWS and 0.40% for IOO.
IOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.05 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EWS and IOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer