PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
EWS vs. FLTW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

EWS vs. FLTW

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

EWS (iShares MSCI Singapore ETF) and FLTW (Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - EWS tracks the MSCI Singapore Index while FLTW tracks the FTSE Taiwan RIC Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EWS returned 10.27%/yr vs 21.46%/yr for FLTW. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EWS charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for FLTW.

Performance

EWS vs. FLTW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Singapore ETF (EWS) and Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF (FLTW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EWS achieves a 9.65% return, which is significantly lower than FLTW's 69.07% return.

EWS

1D
-0.54%
1M
2.36%
YTD
9.65%
6M
9.41%
1Y
22.70%
3Y*
22.62%
5Y*
10.27%
10Y*
8.34%

FLTW

1D
-5.93%
1M
8.95%
YTD
69.07%
6M
72.09%
1Y
109.94%
3Y*
41.99%
5Y*
21.46%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EWS vs. FLTW - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EWS
iShares MSCI Singapore ETF		9.65%31.35%22.10%6.15%-9.80%5.47%-8.47%14.54%-11.34%3.56%
FLTW
Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF		69.07%32.00%16.68%30.05%-27.51%29.46%29.77%31.23%-9.32%-1.28%

Correlation

The correlation between EWS and FLTW is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017

0.58

The correlation between EWS and FLTW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

EWS vs. FLTW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
EWS
FLTW

Financial Services

51.6%
11.2%

Industrials

18.1%
3.3%

Real Estate

8.9%

-

Consumer Cyclical

4.6%
1.5%

Technology

4.5%
78.7%

Utilities

4.3%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.1%
0.7%

Communication Services

3.9%
1.4%

Basic Materials

-

2.5%

Energy

-

0.1%

Healthcare

-

0.6%

Financial Services

EWS
51.6%
FLTW
11.2%

Industrials

EWS
18.1%
FLTW
3.3%

Real Estate

EWS
8.9%
FLTW

-

Consumer Cyclical

EWS
4.6%
FLTW
1.5%

Technology

EWS
4.5%
FLTW
78.7%

Utilities

EWS
4.3%
FLTW

-

Consumer Defensive

EWS
4.1%
FLTW
0.7%

Communication Services

EWS
3.9%
FLTW
1.4%

Basic Materials

EWS

-

FLTW
2.5%

Energy

EWS

-

FLTW
0.1%

Healthcare

EWS

-

FLTW
0.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares MSCI Singapore ETF

Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF

Often compared with EWS:
EWS vs. EWHEWS vs. EWTEWS vs. EWJEWS vs. ASEAEWS vs. EIDOEWS vs. SMINEWS vs. FLGR
Often compared with FLTW:
FLTW vs. EWTFLTW vs. VOOFLTW vs. FLGRFLTW vs. EMMFFLTW vs. SCHDFLTW vs. VXUSFLTW vs. TWN

Return for Risk

EWS vs. FLTW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
EWS
EWS Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
EWS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWS Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
EWS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWS Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
FLTW
FLTW Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
FLTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLTW Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
FLTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLTW Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EWS vs. FLTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Singapore ETF (EWS) and Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF (FLTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

EWSFLTWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.49
3.80

-2.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.14
4.09

-1.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.60

-0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.92

10.17

-7.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.04

30.39

-23.35

EWS vs. FLTW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWS Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is lower than the FLTW Sharpe Ratio of 3.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWS and FLTW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EWS vs. FLTW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWS drawdown since its inception was -75.13%, which is greater than FLTW's maximum drawdown of -38.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWS and FLTW.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

EWSFLTWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.13%

-38.00%

-37.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.82%

-10.87%

+3.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.34%

-26.45%

+10.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.06%

-38.00%

+8.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.84%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.54%

-5.93%

+5.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.96%

-8.41%

-13.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.23%

3.63%

-0.40%

Volatility

EWS vs. FLTW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Singapore ETF (EWS) is 5.13%, while Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF (FLTW) has a volatility of 16.14%. This indicates that EWS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLTW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

EWSFLTWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.13%

16.14%

-11.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.17%

25.07%

-12.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.28%

29.07%

-13.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.32%

23.23%

-5.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.98%

22.20%

-4.22%

EWS vs. FLTW - Expense Ratio Comparison

EWS has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than FLTW's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

EWS vs. FLTW - Dividend Comparison

EWS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.00%, more than FLTW's 1.42% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EWS
iShares MSCI Singapore ETF		4.00%4.10%4.28%6.50%2.56%6.00%2.68%4.70%4.21%3.46%3.96%4.20%
FLTW
Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF		1.42%2.51%1.89%2.85%3.16%2.31%2.14%3.00%1.06%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

EWS and FLTW have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLTW has higher volatility (16.14%) compared to EWS (5.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWS dropped -75.13% vs FLTW's -38.00%.

On 5-year performance, FLTW leads with 21.46% vs 10.27% for EWS. On fees, FLTW is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, EWS has been the lower-risk option at 5.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FLTW has performed better with a 21.46% return vs 10.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLTW is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for EWS.

EWS has the higher dividend yield at 4.00%, compared with 1.42% for FLTW.

EWS tracks MSCI Singapore Index, while FLTW tracks FTSE Taiwan RIC Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for EWS and 0.19% for FLTW.

FLTW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.80 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EWS and FLTW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer