EWS vs. EWI
EWS (iShares MSCI Singapore ETF) and EWI (iShares MSCI Italy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EWS is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Singapore Index, while EWI is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Italy Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EWS returned 7.88%/yr vs 14.33%/yr for EWI. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EWS charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for EWI.
Performance
EWS vs. EWI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EWS achieves a 5.96% return, which is significantly lower than EWI's 11.67% return. Over the past 10 years, EWS has underperformed EWI with an annualized return of 7.88%, while EWI has yielded a comparatively higher 14.33% annualized return.
EWS
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- -0.82%
- YTD
- 5.96%
- 6M
- 7.68%
- 1Y
- 17.42%
- 3Y*
- 20.28%
- 5Y*
- 8.93%
- 10Y*
- 7.88%
EWI
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- 2.99%
- YTD
- 11.67%
- 6M
- 14.54%
- 1Y
- 29.63%
- 3Y*
- 28.93%
- 5Y*
- 16.23%
- 10Y*
- 14.33%
EWS vs. EWI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWS iShares MSCI Singapore ETF | 5.96% | 31.35% | 22.10% | 6.15% | -9.80% | 5.47% | -8.47% | 14.54% | -11.34% | 34.78% |
EWI iShares MSCI Italy ETF | 11.67% | 55.72% | 10.23% | 30.63% | -14.16% | 14.38% | 1.69% | 26.98% | -17.18% | 28.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between EWS and EWI is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 1996 | 0.49 |
The correlation between EWS and EWI shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (all time) to 0.63 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
EWS vs. EWI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EWS
EWI
Financial Services
Industrials
Real Estate
-
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Technology
-
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
EWS
EWI
Industrials
EWS
EWI
Real Estate
EWS
EWI
-
Utilities
EWS
EWI
Consumer Defensive
EWS
EWI
Communication Services
EWS
EWI
Technology
EWS
EWI
-
Consumer Cyclical
EWS
EWI
Basic Materials
EWS
-
EWI
Energy
EWS
-
EWI
Healthcare
EWS
-
EWI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EWS vs. EWI — Risk / Return Rank
EWS
EWI
EWS vs. EWI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Singapore ETF (EWS) and iShares MSCI Italy ETF (EWI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EWS | EWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.27 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.24 | 2.39 | -0.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.40 | 8.88 | -3.48 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EWS vs. EWI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EWS drawdown since its inception was -75.13%, which is greater than EWI's maximum drawdown of -70.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWS and EWI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EWS | EWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.13% | -70.38% | -4.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.82% | -12.48% | +4.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.34% | -16.80% | +0.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.06% | -35.25% | +6.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.84% | -43.00% | +2.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.77% | 0.00% | -2.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.98% | -28.91% | +6.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.23% | 3.35% | -0.12% |
Volatility
EWS vs. EWI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Singapore ETF (EWS) is 5.05%, while iShares MSCI Italy ETF (EWI) has a volatility of 6.36%. This indicates that EWS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EWI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EWS | EWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.05% | 6.36% | -1.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.11% | 15.25% | -3.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.24% | 18.52% | -3.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.34% | 21.17% | -3.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.04% | 23.23% | -5.19% |
EWS vs. EWI - Expense Ratio Comparison
EWS has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than EWI's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
EWS vs. EWI - Dividend Comparison
EWS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.87%, more than EWI's 2.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWI iShares MSCI Italy ETF | 2.51% | 2.80% | 4.07% | 3.40% | 4.57% | 2.63% | 1.66% | 3.80% | 4.71% | 2.19% | 3.64% | 2.31% |
EWS iShares MSCI Singapore ETF | 3.87% | 4.10% | 4.28% | 6.50% | 2.56% | 6.00% | 2.68% | 4.70% | 4.21% | 3.46% | 3.96% | 4.20% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EWS and EWI have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EWI has higher volatility (6.36%) compared to EWS (5.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWS dropped -75.13% vs EWI's -70.38%.
On 10-year performance, EWI leads with 14.33% vs 7.88% for EWS. On fees, EWI is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, EWS has been the lower-risk option at 5.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EWI has performed better with a 14.33% return vs 7.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EWI is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for EWS.
EWS has the higher dividend yield at 3.87%, compared with 2.51% for EWI.
EWS is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while EWI is Europe Equities. EWS tracks MSCI Singapore Index, while EWI tracks MSCI Italy Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for EWS and 0.49% for EWI.
EWI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EWS and EWI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer