PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EWQ vs. ENOR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EWQ vs. ENOR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI France ETF (EWQ) and iShares MSCI Norway ETF (ENOR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EWQ achieves a 1.20% return, which is significantly lower than ENOR's 28.21% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with EWQ having a 9.13% annualized return and ENOR not far ahead at 9.41%.


EWQ

1D
-1.19%
1M
2.85%
YTD
1.20%
6M
2.17%
1Y
9.25%
3Y*
9.50%
5Y*
6.30%
10Y*
9.13%

ENOR

1D
-0.57%
1M
-1.34%
YTD
28.21%
6M
33.17%
1Y
37.30%
3Y*
23.56%
5Y*
8.25%
10Y*
9.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EWQ vs. ENOR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EWQ
iShares MSCI France ETF
1.20%28.90%-5.63%21.71%-12.05%21.43%2.86%26.69%-12.90%29.11%
ENOR
iShares MSCI Norway ETF
28.21%32.00%-2.29%4.80%-12.53%18.69%2.54%12.77%-8.50%21.98%

Correlation

The correlation between EWQ and ENOR is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2012

0.66

Over the past year, the correlation between EWQ and ENOR has dropped to 0.37 - well below their long-term average of 0.66, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

EWQ vs. ENOR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EWQ
ENOR

Industrials

31.7%
13.9%

Financial Services

12.8%
22.4%

Consumer Cyclical

12.0%
0.2%

Healthcare

8.4%

-

Consumer Defensive

8.3%
12.4%

Energy

8.0%
29.2%

Basic Materials

7.0%
10.8%

Technology

4.1%
4.1%

Communication Services

3.0%
5.8%

Utilities

2.6%
0.7%

Real Estate

1.4%
0.4%

Industrials

EWQ
31.7%
ENOR
13.9%

Financial Services

EWQ
12.8%
ENOR
22.4%

Consumer Cyclical

EWQ
12.0%
ENOR
0.2%

Healthcare

EWQ
8.4%
ENOR

-

Consumer Defensive

EWQ
8.3%
ENOR
12.4%

Energy

EWQ
8.0%
ENOR
29.2%

Basic Materials

EWQ
7.0%
ENOR
10.8%

Technology

EWQ
4.1%
ENOR
4.1%

Communication Services

EWQ
3.0%
ENOR
5.8%

Utilities

EWQ
2.6%
ENOR
0.7%

Real Estate

EWQ
1.4%
ENOR
0.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EWQ vs. ENOR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EWQ
EWQ Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
EWQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWQ Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
EWQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWQ Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

ENOR
ENOR Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
ENOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ENOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
ENOR Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
ENOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
ENOR Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EWQ vs. ENOR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI France ETF (EWQ) and iShares MSCI Norway ETF (ENOR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EWQENORDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.37

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.67

4.16

-3.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.08

11.78

-9.70

EWQ vs. ENOR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWQ Sharpe Ratio is 0.54, which is lower than the ENOR Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWQ and ENOR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EWQENORDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

2.15

-1.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

0.37

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

0.39

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

0.25

+0.02

Drawdowns

EWQ vs. ENOR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWQ drawdown since its inception was -61.41%, which is greater than ENOR's maximum drawdown of -55.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWQ and ENOR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EWQENORDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.41%

-55.35%

-6.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.80%

-9.01%

-4.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.16%

-15.84%

+0.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.46%

-32.65%

+1.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.23%

-54.21%

+14.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.83%

-3.15%

-2.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.08%

-16.58%

+0.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.46%

3.18%

+1.28%

Volatility

EWQ vs. ENOR - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI France ETF (EWQ) has a higher volatility of 6.56% compared to iShares MSCI Norway ETF (ENOR) at 5.14%. This indicates that EWQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ENOR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EWQENORDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.56%

5.14%

+1.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.52%

13.62%

-0.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.15%

17.43%

-0.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.78%

22.18%

-2.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.81%

24.02%

-3.21%

EWQ vs. ENOR - Expense Ratio Comparison

EWQ has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than ENOR's 0.53% expense ratio.


Dividends

EWQ vs. ENOR - Dividend Comparison

EWQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%, more than ENOR's 2.31% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ENOR
iShares MSCI Norway ETF
2.31%2.96%6.32%5.06%4.02%2.24%2.39%3.15%2.79%2.47%2.96%3.24%
EWQ
iShares MSCI France ETF
2.60%2.63%3.31%2.73%3.23%3.79%1.02%2.44%2.90%1.90%2.84%2.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


EWQ and ENOR have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EWQ has higher volatility (6.56%) compared to ENOR (5.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWQ dropped -61.41% vs ENOR's -55.35%.

On 10-year performance, ENOR leads with 9.41% vs 9.13% for EWQ. On fees, EWQ is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, ENOR has been the lower-risk option at 5.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ENOR has performed better with a 9.41% return vs 9.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EWQ is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.53% for ENOR.

EWQ has the higher dividend yield at 2.60%, compared with 2.31% for ENOR.

EWQ tracks MSCI France Index, while ENOR tracks MSCI Norway IMI 25/50 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for EWQ and 0.53% for ENOR.

ENOR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EWQ and ENOR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer