EWO vs. XLU
EWO (iShares MSCI Austria ETF) and XLU (State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EWO is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Austria Investable Market Index, while XLU is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the Utilities Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EWO returned 14.21%/yr vs 9.19%/yr for XLU. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EWO charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLU.
Performance
EWO vs. XLU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EWO achieves a 16.61% return, which is significantly higher than XLU's 3.55% return. Over the past 10 years, EWO has outperformed XLU with an annualized return of 14.21%, while XLU has yielded a comparatively lower 9.19% annualized return.
EWO
- 1D
- 1.05%
- 1M
- 6.00%
- YTD
- 16.61%
- 6M
- 23.65%
- 1Y
- 44.58%
- 3Y*
- 33.99%
- 5Y*
- 15.24%
- 10Y*
- 14.21%
XLU
- 1D
- 1.86%
- 1M
- -5.69%
- YTD
- 3.55%
- 6M
- 1.36%
- 1Y
- 9.88%
- 3Y*
- 13.91%
- 5Y*
- 9.31%
- 10Y*
- 9.19%
EWO vs. XLU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWO iShares MSCI Austria ETF | 16.61% | 74.21% | 4.05% | 20.63% | -21.95% | 31.50% | -3.67% | 17.05% | -22.88% | 52.47% |
XLU State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF | 3.55% | 16.03% | 23.31% | -7.18% | 1.44% | 17.70% | 0.51% | 25.93% | 3.94% | 12.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between EWO and XLU is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 1998 | 0.28 |
The correlation between EWO and XLU shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (1 year) to 0.28 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
EWO vs. XLU - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EWO
XLU
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
Technology
-
Real Estate
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Financial Services
EWO
XLU
-
Industrials
EWO
XLU
-
Energy
EWO
XLU
-
Basic Materials
EWO
XLU
-
Utilities
EWO
XLU
Technology
EWO
XLU
-
Real Estate
EWO
XLU
-
Consumer Cyclical
EWO
XLU
-
Communication Services
EWO
-
XLU
-
Consumer Defensive
EWO
-
XLU
-
Healthcare
EWO
-
XLU
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EWO vs. XLU — Risk / Return Rank
EWO
XLU
EWO vs. XLU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Austria ETF (EWO) and State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EWO | XLU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.43 | 0.68 | +1.75 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.34 | 1.01 | +2.33 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.13 | +0.29 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.32 | 1.11 | +2.21 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.30 | 2.52 | +8.78 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EWO | XLU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.43 | 0.68 | +1.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 | 0.54 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 | 0.48 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | 0.40 | -0.12 |
Drawdowns
EWO vs. XLU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EWO drawdown since its inception was -75.69%, which is greater than XLU's maximum drawdown of -51.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWO and XLU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EWO | XLU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.69% | -51.98% | -23.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.08% | -9.18% | -4.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.75% | -17.26% | +0.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.82% | -25.26% | -16.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -58.10% | -36.07% | -22.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -7.38% | +7.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.13% | -10.22% | -17.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.14% | 4.07% | +0.07% |
Volatility
EWO vs. XLU - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Austria ETF (EWO) has a higher volatility of 6.61% compared to State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU) at 5.41%. This indicates that EWO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EWO | XLU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.61% | 5.41% | +1.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.95% | 11.76% | +3.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.47% | 14.56% | +3.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.83% | 17.32% | +4.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.86% | 19.26% | +3.60% |
EWO vs. XLU - Expense Ratio Comparison
EWO has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than XLU's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
EWO vs. XLU - Dividend Comparison
EWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%, less than XLU's 2.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWO iShares MSCI Austria ETF | 2.04% | 2.38% | 7.40% | 5.66% | 4.75% | 2.42% | 0.98% | 3.11% | 4.04% | 2.03% | 1.99% | 1.51% |
XLU State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF | 2.71% | 2.71% | 2.96% | 3.39% | 2.92% | 2.79% | 3.14% | 2.95% | 3.33% | 3.33% | 3.41% | 3.67% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EWO and XLU have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EWO has higher volatility (6.61%) compared to XLU (5.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWO dropped -75.69% vs XLU's -51.98%.
On 10-year performance, EWO leads with 14.21% vs 9.19% for XLU. On fees, XLU is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLU has been the lower-risk option at 5.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EWO has performed better with a 14.21% return vs 9.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLU is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for EWO.
XLU has the higher dividend yield at 2.71%, compared with 2.04% for EWO.
EWO is categorized as Europe Equities, while XLU is Utilities Equities. EWO tracks MSCI Austria Investable Market Index, while XLU tracks Utilities Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for EWO and 0.08% for XLU.
EWO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EWO and XLU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer