PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
EWO vs. BNO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

EWO vs. BNO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

EWO (iShares MSCI Austria ETF) and BNO (United States Brent Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - EWO is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Austria Investable Market Index, while BNO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Brent Crude Oil. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EWO returned 14.00%/yr vs 13.60%/yr for BNO. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EWO charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for BNO.

Performance

EWO vs. BNO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Austria ETF (EWO) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EWO achieves a 14.52% return, which is significantly lower than BNO's 90.47% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with EWO having a 14.00% annualized return and BNO not far behind at 13.60%.

EWO

1D
-1.79%
1M
5.62%
YTD
14.52%
6M
21.29%
1Y
43.71%
3Y*
33.18%
5Y*
14.75%
10Y*
14.00%

BNO

1D
1.99%
1M
-10.29%
YTD
90.47%
6M
86.00%
1Y
91.89%
3Y*
27.93%
5Y*
24.16%
10Y*
13.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EWO vs. BNO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EWO
iShares MSCI Austria ETF		14.52%74.21%4.05%20.63%-21.95%31.50%-3.67%17.05%-22.88%52.47%
BNO
United States Brent Oil Fund LP		90.47%-5.44%9.67%-3.43%35.25%62.34%-38.23%36.01%-15.30%15.43%

Correlation

The correlation between EWO and BNO is -0.36, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2010

0.27

The correlation between EWO and BNO shifts across timeframes, from -0.36 (1 year) to 0.27 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares MSCI Austria ETF

United States Brent Oil Fund LP

Often compared with EWO:
EWO vs. EWAEWO vs. EWQEWO vs. EWLEWO vs. IBZL.LEWO vs. EEMEWO vs. EWGEWO vs. VOO
Often compared with BNO:
BNO vs. USOBNO vs. XLEBNO vs. USLBNO vs. BOILBNO vs. UNGBNO vs. UCOBNO vs. XOM

Return for Risk

EWO vs. BNO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
EWO
EWO Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
EWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWO Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
EWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWO Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
BNO
BNO Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
BNO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNO Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
BNO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNO Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EWO vs. BNO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Austria ETF (EWO) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

EWOBNODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.38

2.23

+0.15

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.27

2.73

+0.54

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.38

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.12

5.17

-2.05

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.58

9.76

+0.82

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EWO vs. BNO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWO Sharpe Ratio is 2.38, which is comparable to the BNO Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWO and BNO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

EWOBNODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.38

2.23

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

0.69

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

0.37

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

0.14

+0.13

Drawdowns

EWO vs. BNO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWO drawdown since its inception was -75.69%, smaller than the maximum BNO drawdown of -87.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWO and BNO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

EWOBNODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.69%

-87.06%

+11.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.08%

-17.87%

+3.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.75%

-23.75%

+7.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.82%

-33.70%

-8.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.10%

-75.18%

+17.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.79%

-10.29%

+8.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.12%

-40.17%

+12.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.14%

9.45%

-5.31%

Volatility

EWO vs. BNO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Austria ETF (EWO) is 6.71%, while United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO) has a volatility of 14.22%. This indicates that EWO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BNO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

EWOBNODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.71%

14.22%

-7.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.08%

36.10%

-21.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.52%

41.46%

-22.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.84%

35.38%

-13.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.86%

36.68%

-13.82%

EWO vs. BNO - Expense Ratio Comparison

EWO has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than BNO's 0.90% expense ratio.

Dividends

EWO vs. BNO - Dividend Comparison

EWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.08%, while BNO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BNO
United States Brent Oil Fund LP		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EWO
iShares MSCI Austria ETF		2.08%2.38%7.40%5.66%4.75%2.42%0.98%3.11%4.04%2.03%1.99%1.51%

Frequently Asked Questions

EWO and BNO have a correlation of -0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BNO has higher volatility (14.22%) compared to EWO (6.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWO dropped -75.69% vs BNO's -87.06%.

On 10-year performance, EWO leads with 14.00% vs 13.60% for BNO. On fees, EWO is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, EWO has been the lower-risk option at 6.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EWO has performed better with a 14.00% return vs 13.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EWO is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for BNO.

EWO has the higher dividend yield at 2.08%, compared with 0.00% for BNO.

EWO is categorized as Europe Equities, while BNO is Oil & Gas. EWO tracks MSCI Austria Investable Market Index, while BNO tracks Front Month Brent Crude Oil. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for EWO and 0.90% for BNO.

EWO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 2.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EWO and BNO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer