PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EWN vs. EWO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EWN vs. EWO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Netherlands ETF (EWN) and iShares MSCI Austria ETF (EWO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EWN achieves a 18.09% return, which is significantly higher than EWO's 14.52% return. Over the past 10 years, EWN has underperformed EWO with an annualized return of 12.79%, while EWO has yielded a comparatively higher 14.00% annualized return.


EWN

1D
-1.30%
1M
8.53%
YTD
18.09%
6M
18.14%
1Y
33.81%
3Y*
19.93%
5Y*
8.69%
10Y*
12.79%

EWO

1D
-1.79%
1M
5.62%
YTD
14.52%
6M
21.29%
1Y
43.71%
3Y*
33.18%
5Y*
14.75%
10Y*
14.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EWN vs. EWO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EWN
iShares MSCI Netherlands ETF
18.09%34.87%1.67%22.08%-24.43%22.74%23.23%32.45%-15.37%33.73%
EWO
iShares MSCI Austria ETF
14.52%74.21%4.05%20.63%-21.95%31.50%-3.67%17.05%-22.88%52.47%

Correlation

The correlation between EWN and EWO is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 1996

0.61

The correlation between EWN and EWO shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (all time) to 0.73 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EWN vs. EWO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EWN
EWO

Technology

34.8%
6.6%

Financial Services

18.1%
46.6%

Communication Services

14.7%

-

Consumer Defensive

11.5%

-

Industrials

10.2%
14.2%

Basic Materials

3.1%
8.1%

Healthcare

2.6%

-

Energy

2.1%
10.8%

Consumer Cyclical

1.5%
1.9%

Real Estate

0.7%
4.4%

Utilities

-

7.5%

Technology

EWN
34.8%
EWO
6.6%

Financial Services

EWN
18.1%
EWO
46.6%

Communication Services

EWN
14.7%
EWO

-

Consumer Defensive

EWN
11.5%
EWO

-

Industrials

EWN
10.2%
EWO
14.2%

Basic Materials

EWN
3.1%
EWO
8.1%

Healthcare

EWN
2.6%
EWO

-

Energy

EWN
2.1%
EWO
10.8%

Consumer Cyclical

EWN
1.5%
EWO
1.9%

Real Estate

EWN
0.7%
EWO
4.4%

Utilities

EWN

-

EWO
7.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EWN vs. EWO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EWN
EWN Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
EWN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWN Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
EWN Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWN Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

EWO
EWO Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
EWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWO Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
EWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWO Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EWN vs. EWO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Netherlands ETF (EWN) and iShares MSCI Austria ETF (EWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EWNEWODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.40

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.57

3.12

-0.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.70

10.58

-0.88

EWN vs. EWO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWN Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is comparable to the EWO Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWN and EWO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EWNEWODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.73

2.38

-0.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

0.68

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

0.61

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.27

+0.03

Drawdowns

EWN vs. EWO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWN drawdown since its inception was -65.22%, smaller than the maximum EWO drawdown of -75.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWN and EWO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EWNEWODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.22%

-75.69%

+10.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.24%

-14.08%

+0.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.77%

-16.75%

-3.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.57%

-41.82%

-1.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.57%

-58.10%

+14.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.30%

-1.79%

+0.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.35%

-28.12%

+11.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.49%

4.14%

-0.65%

Volatility

EWN vs. EWO - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Netherlands ETF (EWN) has a higher volatility of 7.50% compared to iShares MSCI Austria ETF (EWO) at 6.71%. This indicates that EWN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EWO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EWNEWODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.50%

6.71%

+0.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.37%

15.08%

+1.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.68%

18.52%

+1.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.88%

21.84%

+1.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.36%

22.86%

-1.50%

EWN vs. EWO - Expense Ratio Comparison

EWN has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than EWO's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

EWN vs. EWO - Dividend Comparison

EWN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.26%, more than EWO's 2.08% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EWN
iShares MSCI Netherlands ETF
4.26%5.03%2.18%1.79%1.98%1.01%0.78%2.57%2.40%1.68%2.71%1.92%
EWO
iShares MSCI Austria ETF
2.08%2.38%7.40%5.66%4.75%2.42%0.98%3.11%4.04%2.03%1.99%1.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


EWN and EWO have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EWN has higher volatility (7.50%) compared to EWO (6.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWN dropped -65.22% vs EWO's -75.69%.

On 10-year performance, EWO leads with 14.00% vs 12.79% for EWN. On fees, EWO is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, EWO has been the lower-risk option at 6.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EWO has performed better with a 14.00% return vs 12.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EWO is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for EWN.

EWN has the higher dividend yield at 4.26%, compared with 2.08% for EWO.

EWN tracks MSCI Netherlands Investable Market Index, while EWO tracks MSCI Austria Investable Market Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for EWN and 0.49% for EWO.

EWO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EWN and EWO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer