PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EWMC vs. VXF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EWMC vs. VXF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF (EWMC) and Vanguard Extended Market ETF (VXF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with EWMC having a 13.17% return and VXF slightly higher at 13.55%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with EWMC having a 11.33% annualized return and VXF not far ahead at 11.74%.


EWMC

1D
-0.35%
1M
2.06%
6M
11.71%
YTD
13.17%
1Y
21.04%
3Y*
13.73%
5Y*
9.29%
10Y*
11.33%
ALL TIME*
11.48%

VXF

1D
-0.30%
1M
-2.91%
6M
10.93%
YTD
13.55%
1Y
23.35%
3Y*
16.01%
5Y*
6.11%
10Y*
11.74%
ALL TIME*
9.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.43M$1.18M$1.33M
$71.64M$76.55M$103.41M

EWMC vs. VXF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EWMC
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF
13.17%7.81%15.67%18.79%-11.63%26.35%15.60%23.05%-12.45%13.05%
VXF
Vanguard Extended Market ETF
13.55%11.40%16.89%25.51%-26.52%12.31%32.45%27.96%-9.34%18.06%

Correlation

The correlation between EWMC and VXF is 0.79, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2010

0.90

The correlation between EWMC and VXF shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (1 year) to 0.90 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EWMC vs. VXF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EWMC
VXF

Industrials

17.9%
19.6%

Consumer Cyclical

16.0%
8.5%

Financial Services

13.8%
13.7%

Technology

13.3%
19.2%

Healthcare

9.8%
13.6%

Real Estate

7.8%
5.6%

Basic Materials

5.9%
4.7%

Energy

5.1%
4.3%

Consumer Defensive

5.0%
2.6%

Utilities

3.4%
1.8%

Communication Services

2.0%
2.8%

Industrials

EWMC
17.9%
VXF
19.6%

Consumer Cyclical

EWMC
16.0%
VXF
8.5%

Financial Services

EWMC
13.8%
VXF
13.7%

Technology

EWMC
13.3%
VXF
19.2%

Healthcare

EWMC
9.8%
VXF
13.6%

Real Estate

EWMC
7.8%
VXF
5.6%

Basic Materials

EWMC
5.9%
VXF
4.7%

Energy

EWMC
5.1%
VXF
4.3%

Consumer Defensive

EWMC
5.0%
VXF
2.6%

Utilities

EWMC
3.4%
VXF
1.8%

Communication Services

EWMC
2.0%
VXF
2.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EWMC vs. VXF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EWMC
EWMC Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
EWMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWMC Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
EWMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWMC Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

VXF
VXF Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
VXF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VXF Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
VXF Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
VXF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
VXF Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EWMC vs. VXF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF (EWMC) and Vanguard Extended Market ETF (VXF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EWMCVXFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.21

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.58

2.04

+0.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.67

6.94

+0.73

EWMC vs. VXF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWMC Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is comparable to the VXF Sharpe Ratio of 1.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWMC and VXF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EWMC vs. VXF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWMC drawdown since its inception was -43.12%, smaller than the maximum VXF drawdown of -58.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWMC and VXF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EWMCVXFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.12%

-58.03%

+14.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.62%

-10.21%

+2.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.09%

-26.92%

-1.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.09%

-36.39%

+8.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.12%

-41.72%

-1.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.19%

-4.08%

+2.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.66%

-9.50%

+3.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.56%

3.01%

-0.45%

Volatility

EWMC vs. VXF - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF (EWMC) and Vanguard Extended Market ETF (VXF) have volatilities of 4.04% and 3.91%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EWMCVXFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.04%

3.91%

+0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.51%

13.29%

-2.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.65%

17.80%

-2.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.80%

22.38%

-1.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.19%

22.27%

-0.08%

EWMC vs. VXF - Expense Ratio Comparison

EWMC has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than VXF's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

EWMC vs. VXF - Dividend Comparison

EWMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%, less than VXF's 1.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EWMC
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF
0.70%1.19%0.95%0.96%1.28%0.92%1.16%1.25%1.50%1.14%1.00%1.43%
VXF
Vanguard Extended Market ETF
1.03%1.14%1.09%1.27%1.15%1.13%1.07%1.30%1.66%1.25%1.43%1.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


EWMC and VXF have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EWMC has higher volatility (4.04%) compared to VXF (3.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWMC dropped -43.12% vs VXF's -58.03%.

On 10-year performance, VXF leads with 11.74% vs 11.33% for EWMC. On fees, VXF is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, VXF has been the lower-risk option at 3.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VXF has performed better with a 11.74% return vs 11.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VXF is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for EWMC.

VXF has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.70% for EWMC.

EWMC is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while VXF is Mid Cap Blend Equities. EWMC tracks S&P MidCap 400 GARP Index, while VXF tracks S&P Completion Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for EWMC and 0.05% for VXF.

EWMC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.26 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EWMC and VXF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer