EWMC vs. REGL

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Equal Weight ETF (EWMC) and ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (REGL).

EWMC and REGL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EWMC is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Equal Weight Index. It was launched on Dec 8, 2010. REGL is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats Index. It was launched on Feb 5, 2015. Both EWMC and REGL are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

EWMC vs. REGL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Equal Weight ETF (EWMC) and ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (REGL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

EWMC vs. REGL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EWMC Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Equal Weight ETF	-1.30%	7.81%	15.67%	18.79%	-11.63%	26.35%	15.60%	23.05%	-12.45%	13.05%
REGL ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF	3.22%	6.89%	12.26%	5.41%	-0.62%	20.38%	7.50%	18.79%	-3.25%	10.17%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EWMC achieves a -1.30% return, which is significantly lower than REGL's 3.22% return. Over the past 10 years, EWMC has outperformed REGL with an annualized return of 10.52%, while REGL has yielded a comparatively lower 9.51% annualized return.

EWMC

• 1D: 2.28%
• 1M: -2.74%
• YTD: -1.30%
• 6M: -1.63%
• 1Y: 14.14%
• 3Y*: 11.92%
• 5Y*: 6.76%
• 10Y*: 10.52%

REGL

• 1D: 1.37%
• 1M: -5.30%
• YTD: 3.22%
• 6M: 2.59%
• 1Y: 9.63%
• 3Y*: 9.51%
• 5Y*: 6.82%
• 10Y*: 9.51%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EWMC vs. REGL - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both EWMC and REGL have an expense ratio of 0.40%.

EWMC

Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Equal Weight ETF

REGL

ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF

Return for Risk

EWMC vs. REGL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EWMC

EWMC Risk / Return Rank: 37
EWMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
EWMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
EWMC Omega Ratio Rank: 35
EWMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
EWMC Martin Ratio Rank: 42

REGL

REGL Risk / Return Rank: 35
REGL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
REGL Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
REGL Omega Ratio Rank: 31
REGL Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
REGL Martin Ratio Rank: 37

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EWMC vs. REGL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Equal Weight ETF (EWMC) and ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (REGL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EWMC	REGL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.61	0.60	+0.02
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.04	0.97	+0.06
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.12	+0.02
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.92	0.94	-0.01
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.90	3.29	+0.61
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EWMC vs. REGL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWMC Sharpe Ratio is 0.61, which is comparable to the REGL Sharpe Ratio of 0.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWMC and REGL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EWMC	REGL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.61	0.60	+0.02
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.32	0.43	-0.10
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.47	0.52	-0.05
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.52	0.53	-0.01

Correlation

The correlation between EWMC and REGL is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

EWMC vs. REGL - Dividend Comparison

EWMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, less than REGL's 2.25% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EWMC Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Equal Weight ETF	1.04%	1.19%	0.95%	0.96%	1.28%	0.92%	1.16%	1.25%	1.50%	1.14%	1.00%	1.43%
REGL ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF	2.25%	2.32%	2.28%	2.40%	2.32%	2.50%	2.41%	1.96%	2.09%	1.63%	1.20%	1.66%

Drawdowns

EWMC vs. REGL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWMC drawdown since its inception was -43.12%, which is greater than REGL's maximum drawdown of -36.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWMC and REGL.

Drawdown Indicators

	EWMC	REGL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.12%	-36.37%	-6.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.51%	-10.94%	-4.57%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.09%	-16.96%	-11.13%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.12%	-36.37%	-6.75%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.24%	-6.51%	+1.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.76%	-4.09%	-1.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.67%	3.11%	+0.56%

Volatility

EWMC vs. REGL - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Equal Weight ETF (EWMC) has a higher volatility of 4.88% compared to ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (REGL) at 4.35%. This indicates that EWMC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than REGL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EWMC	REGL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.88%	4.35%	+0.53%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.09%	9.21%	+2.88%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.17%	16.27%	+6.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.00%	16.11%	+4.89%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.27%	18.31%	+3.96%