EWMC vs. OMFL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

EWMC (Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF) and OMFL (Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EWMC is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 GARP Index, while OMFL is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Invesco Dynamic Multifactor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EWMC returned 7.66%/yr vs 9.27%/yr for OMFL. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EWMC charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for OMFL.

Performance

EWMC vs. OMFL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF (EWMC) and Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EWMC achieves a 7.11% return, which is significantly lower than OMFL's 12.39% return.

EWMC

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: 2.30%
• YTD: 7.11%
• 6M: 6.51%
• 1Y: 21.90%
• 3Y*: 14.94%
• 5Y*: 7.66%
• 10Y*: 10.99%

OMFL

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: 4.53%
• YTD: 12.39%
• 6M: 12.90%
• 1Y: 21.98%
• 3Y*: 14.35%
• 5Y*: 9.27%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EWMC vs. OMFL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EWMC Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF	7.11%	7.81%	15.67%	18.79%	-11.63%	26.35%	15.60%	23.05%	-12.45%	5.20%
OMFL Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF	12.39%	13.68%	6.82%	21.53%	-13.97%	28.95%	20.91%	35.58%	-2.55%	4.95%

Correlation

The correlation between EWMC and OMFL is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.69
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.76
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2017	0.83

The correlation between EWMC and OMFL shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (1 year) to 0.83 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EWMC vs. OMFL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EWMC	OMFL
Industrials	17.9%	9.8%
Consumer Cyclical	16.0%	9.5%
Financial Services	13.8%	11.5%
Technology	13.3%	31.0%
Healthcare	9.8%	10.4%
Real Estate	7.8%	0.8%
Basic Materials	5.9%	2.5%
Energy	5.1%	3.7%
Consumer Defensive	5.0%	8.8%
Utilities	3.4%	0.4%
Communication Services	2.0%	11.7%

Return for Risk

EWMC vs. OMFL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EWMC

EWMC Risk / Return Rank: 44
EWMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
EWMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
EWMC Omega Ratio Rank: 36
EWMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
EWMC Martin Ratio Rank: 51

OMFL

OMFL Risk / Return Rank: 57
OMFL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
OMFL Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
OMFL Omega Ratio Rank: 52
OMFL Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
OMFL Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EWMC vs. OMFL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF (EWMC) and Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EWMC	OMFL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.37	1.84	-0.46
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.04	2.57	-0.53
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.33	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.89	2.91	-0.03
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.54	13.12	-4.58
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EWMC vs. OMFL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWMC Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is comparable to the OMFL Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWMC and OMFL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EWMC	OMFL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.37	1.84	-0.46
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.37	0.56	-0.19
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.50	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.55	0.70	-0.16

Drawdowns

EWMC vs. OMFL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWMC drawdown since its inception was -43.12%, which is greater than OMFL's maximum drawdown of -33.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWMC and OMFL.

Drawdown Indicators

	EWMC	OMFL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.12%	-33.24%	-9.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.62%	-7.58%	-0.04%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.09%	-15.52%	-12.57%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.09%	-22.44%	-5.65%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.12%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.11%	-0.19%	+0.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.71%	-4.80%	-0.91%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.57%	1.68%	+0.89%

Volatility

EWMC vs. OMFL - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF (EWMC) has a higher volatility of 3.82% compared to Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFL) at 2.40%. This indicates that EWMC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OMFL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EWMC	OMFL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.82%	2.40%	+1.42%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.44%	9.45%	+0.99%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.13%	12.03%	+4.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.90%	16.75%	+4.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.25%	20.11%	+2.14%

EWMC vs. OMFL - Expense Ratio Comparison

EWMC has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than OMFL's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

EWMC vs. OMFL - Dividend Comparison

EWMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, more than OMFL's 0.75% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EWMC Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF	0.96%	1.19%	0.95%	0.96%	1.28%	0.92%	1.16%	1.25%	1.50%	1.14%	1.00%	1.43%
OMFL Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF	0.75%	0.80%	1.22%	1.37%	1.55%	0.95%	1.48%	1.53%	1.39%	0.32%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EWMC and OMFL in my portfolio?

EWMC and OMFL have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EWMC or OMFL?

EWMC has higher volatility (3.82%) compared to OMFL (2.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWMC dropped -43.12% vs OMFL's -33.24%.

Which ETF is better, EWMC or OMFL?

On 5-year performance, OMFL leads with 9.27% vs 7.66% for EWMC. On fees, OMFL is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, OMFL has been the lower-risk option at 2.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EWMC or OMFL?

Over the 5-year period, OMFL has performed better with a 9.27% return vs 7.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EWMC or OMFL?

OMFL is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for EWMC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EWMC or OMFL?

EWMC has the higher dividend yield at 0.96%, compared with 0.75% for OMFL.

What is the main difference between EWMC and OMFL?

EWMC is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while OMFL is Large Cap Blend Equities. EWMC tracks S&P MidCap 400 GARP Index, while OMFL tracks Russell 1000 Invesco Dynamic Multifactor Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for EWMC and 0.29% for OMFL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

OMFL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.