PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EWMC vs. ISCB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EWMC vs. ISCB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF (EWMC) and iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF (ISCB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EWMC achieves a 7.11% return, which is significantly lower than ISCB's 11.43% return. Over the past 10 years, EWMC has outperformed ISCB with an annualized return of 10.99%, while ISCB has yielded a comparatively lower 9.30% annualized return.


EWMC

1D
-0.11%
1M
2.30%
YTD
7.11%
6M
6.51%
1Y
21.90%
3Y*
14.94%
5Y*
7.66%
10Y*
10.99%

ISCB

1D
-0.67%
1M
2.77%
YTD
11.43%
6M
11.42%
1Y
29.48%
3Y*
16.41%
5Y*
5.72%
10Y*
9.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EWMC vs. ISCB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EWMC
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF
7.11%7.81%15.67%18.79%-11.63%26.35%15.60%23.05%-12.45%13.05%
ISCB
iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF
11.43%12.46%10.90%19.51%-19.04%17.46%6.29%29.42%-13.92%12.95%

Correlation

The correlation between EWMC and ISCB is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2010

0.92

The correlation between EWMC and ISCB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

EWMC vs. ISCB - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EWMC
ISCB

Industrials

17.9%
18.5%

Consumer Cyclical

16.0%
11.8%

Financial Services

13.8%
15.9%

Technology

13.3%
14.6%

Healthcare

9.8%
13.3%

Real Estate

7.8%
8.2%

Basic Materials

5.9%
4.6%

Energy

5.1%
4.9%

Consumer Defensive

5.0%
3.4%

Utilities

3.4%
2.3%

Communication Services

2.0%
2.6%

Industrials

EWMC
17.9%
ISCB
18.5%

Consumer Cyclical

EWMC
16.0%
ISCB
11.8%

Financial Services

EWMC
13.8%
ISCB
15.9%

Technology

EWMC
13.3%
ISCB
14.6%

Healthcare

EWMC
9.8%
ISCB
13.3%

Real Estate

EWMC
7.8%
ISCB
8.2%

Basic Materials

EWMC
5.9%
ISCB
4.6%

Energy

EWMC
5.1%
ISCB
4.9%

Consumer Defensive

EWMC
5.0%
ISCB
3.4%

Utilities

EWMC
3.4%
ISCB
2.3%

Communication Services

EWMC
2.0%
ISCB
2.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EWMC vs. ISCB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EWMC
EWMC Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
EWMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWMC Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
EWMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWMC Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

ISCB
ISCB Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
ISCB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISCB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISCB Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
ISCB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISCB Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EWMC vs. ISCB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF (EWMC) and iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF (ISCB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EWMCISCBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.31

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.89

3.15

-0.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.54

11.26

-2.71

EWMC vs. ISCB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWMC Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is comparable to the ISCB Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWMC and ISCB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EWMCISCBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.37

1.80

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

0.27

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

0.41

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.38

+0.17

Drawdowns

EWMC vs. ISCB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWMC drawdown since its inception was -43.12%, smaller than the maximum ISCB drawdown of -61.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWMC and ISCB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EWMCISCBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.12%

-61.25%

+18.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.62%

-9.39%

+1.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.09%

-26.22%

-1.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.09%

-29.94%

+1.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.12%

-44.18%

+1.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.11%

-0.67%

+0.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.71%

-9.80%

+4.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.57%

2.63%

-0.06%

Volatility

EWMC vs. ISCB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF (EWMC) is 3.82%, while iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF (ISCB) has a volatility of 4.28%. This indicates that EWMC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ISCB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EWMCISCBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.82%

4.28%

-0.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.44%

11.43%

-0.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.13%

16.51%

-0.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.90%

21.39%

-0.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.25%

22.68%

-0.43%

EWMC vs. ISCB - Expense Ratio Comparison

EWMC has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than ISCB's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

EWMC vs. ISCB - Dividend Comparison

EWMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, less than ISCB's 1.27% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EWMC
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF
0.96%1.19%0.95%0.96%1.28%0.92%1.16%1.25%1.50%1.14%1.00%1.43%
ISCB
iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF
1.27%1.38%1.31%1.49%1.63%1.26%1.26%1.25%1.60%1.24%1.58%1.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


EWMC and ISCB have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ISCB has higher volatility (4.28%) compared to EWMC (3.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWMC dropped -43.12% vs ISCB's -61.25%.

On 10-year performance, EWMC leads with 10.99% vs 9.30% for ISCB. On fees, ISCB is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, EWMC has been the lower-risk option at 3.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EWMC has performed better with a 10.99% return vs 9.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ISCB is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for EWMC.

ISCB has the higher dividend yield at 1.27%, compared with 0.96% for EWMC.

EWMC tracks S&P MidCap 400 GARP Index, while ISCB tracks Morningstar US Small Cap Extended Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for EWMC and 0.04% for ISCB.

ISCB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EWMC and ISCB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer