EWJV vs. ASIA

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

EWJV (iShares MSCI Japan Value ETF) and ASIA (Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EWJV is a Japan Equities fund tracking the MSCI Japan Value Index, while ASIA is a Asia Pacific Equities fund actively managed by Matthews. EWJV is passively managed, while ASIA is actively managed. Over the past year, EWJV returned 36.33% vs 66.09% for ASIA. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EWJV charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for ASIA.

Performance

EWJV vs. ASIA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Japan Value ETF (EWJV) and Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF (ASIA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EWJV achieves a 14.97% return, which is significantly lower than ASIA's 33.47% return.

EWJV

• 1D: 0.27%
• 1M: 6.48%
• YTD: 14.97%
• 6M: 18.88%
• 1Y: 36.33%
• 3Y*: 24.24%
• 5Y*: 13.51%
• 10Y*: —

ASIA

• 1D: -1.35%
• 1M: 11.70%
• YTD: 33.47%
• 6M: 38.00%
• 1Y: 66.09%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EWJV vs. ASIA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
EWJV iShares MSCI Japan Value ETF	14.97%	33.96%	11.59%	0.68%
ASIA Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF	33.47%	32.06%	3.41%	0.01%

Correlation

The correlation between EWJV and ASIA is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.44
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2023	0.42

EWJV vs. ASIA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EWJV	ASIA
Financial Services	30.2%	17.6%
Industrials	23.9%	11.6%
Consumer Cyclical	13.8%	7.5%
Technology	9.4%	46.6%
Communication Services	6.3%	5.1%
Healthcare	4.3%	4.0%
Consumer Defensive	3.5%	1.1%
Real Estate	2.9%	2.9%
Energy	2.1%	2.1%
Basic Materials	2.0%	2.5%
Utilities	1.6%	-

Return for Risk

EWJV vs. ASIA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EWJV

EWJV Risk / Return Rank: 52
EWJV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
EWJV Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
EWJV Omega Ratio Rank: 56
EWJV Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
EWJV Martin Ratio Rank: 45

ASIA

ASIA Risk / Return Rank: 86
ASIA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
ASIA Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
ASIA Omega Ratio Rank: 88
ASIA Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
ASIA Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EWJV vs. ASIA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Japan Value ETF (EWJV) and Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF (ASIA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EWJV	ASIA	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.90	3.08	-1.18
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.72	3.78	-1.05
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.55	-0.20
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.48	4.59	-2.11
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.52	17.09	-9.57
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EWJV vs. ASIA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWJV Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is lower than the ASIA Sharpe Ratio of 3.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWJV and ASIA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EWJV	ASIA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.90	3.08	-1.18
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.75	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.69	1.24	-0.55

Drawdowns

EWJV vs. ASIA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWJV drawdown since its inception was -30.05%, which is greater than ASIA's maximum drawdown of -23.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWJV and ASIA.

Drawdown Indicators

	EWJV	ASIA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.05%	-23.95%	-6.10%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.74%	-14.47%	-0.27%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.74%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.39%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.99%	-1.35%	-2.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.19%	-4.85%	-1.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.85%	3.88%	+0.97%

Volatility

EWJV vs. ASIA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Japan Value ETF (EWJV) is 3.96%, while Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF (ASIA) has a volatility of 9.93%. This indicates that EWJV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASIA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EWJV	ASIA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.96%	9.93%	-5.97%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.55%	18.57%	-4.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.22%	21.56%	-2.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.01%	20.24%	-2.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.53%	20.24%	-1.71%

EWJV vs. ASIA - Expense Ratio Comparison

EWJV has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than ASIA's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

EWJV vs. ASIA - Dividend Comparison

EWJV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.66%, more than ASIA's 0.78% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
ASIA Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF	0.78%	1.05%	0.58%	0.12%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
EWJV iShares MSCI Japan Value ETF	4.66%	5.35%	4.10%	3.32%	2.71%	2.46%	1.96%	4.29%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EWJV and ASIA in my portfolio?

EWJV and ASIA have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EWJV or ASIA?

ASIA has higher volatility (9.93%) compared to EWJV (3.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWJV dropped -30.05% vs ASIA's -23.95%.

Which ETF is better, EWJV or ASIA?

On 1-year performance, ASIA leads with 66.09% vs 36.33% for EWJV. On fees, EWJV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, EWJV has been the lower-risk option at 3.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EWJV or ASIA?

Over the 1-year period, ASIA has performed better with a 66.09% return vs 36.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EWJV or ASIA?

EWJV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for ASIA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EWJV or ASIA?

EWJV has the higher dividend yield at 4.66%, compared with 0.78% for ASIA.

What is the main difference between EWJV and ASIA?

EWJV is categorized as Japan Equities, while ASIA is Asia Pacific Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Matthews. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for EWJV and 0.79% for ASIA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ASIA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.08 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.