PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EWJ vs. QQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EWJ vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Japan ETF (EWJ) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with EWJ having a 17.82% return and QQQ slightly higher at 18.11%. Over the past 10 years, EWJ has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 9.08%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 20.86% annualized return.


EWJ

1D
1.83%
1M
1.58%
6M
9.74%
YTD
17.82%
1Y
31.07%
3Y*
18.66%
5Y*
9.41%
10Y*
9.08%
ALL TIME*
2.68%

QQQ

1D
3.40%
1M
1.58%
6M
17.69%
YTD
18.11%
1Y
28.94%
3Y*
25.56%
5Y*
15.07%
10Y*
20.86%
ALL TIME*
10.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$398.96M$430.07M$517.76M
$33.34B$28.86B$31.95B

EWJ vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EWJ
iShares MSCI Japan ETF
17.82%25.84%7.03%20.29%-17.72%1.16%15.40%19.34%-14.10%24.27%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
18.11%20.77%25.58%54.86%-32.58%27.42%48.62%38.96%-0.13%32.66%

Correlation

The correlation between EWJ and QQQ is 0.65, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.62

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 1999

0.56

The correlation between EWJ and QQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

EWJ vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EWJ
QQQ

Technology

24.9%
60.9%

Industrials

22.9%
2.7%

Financial Services

17.6%
0.2%

Consumer Cyclical

11.2%
10.7%

Communication Services

8.1%
13.1%

Healthcare

5.3%
3.6%

Consumer Defensive

3.4%
6.3%

Basic Materials

3.1%
1.0%

Real Estate

1.9%
0.1%

Utilities

1.0%
1.1%

Energy

0.8%
0.5%

Technology

EWJ
24.9%
QQQ
60.9%

Industrials

EWJ
22.9%
QQQ
2.7%

Financial Services

EWJ
17.6%
QQQ
0.2%

Consumer Cyclical

EWJ
11.2%
QQQ
10.7%

Communication Services

EWJ
8.1%
QQQ
13.1%

Healthcare

EWJ
5.3%
QQQ
3.6%

Consumer Defensive

EWJ
3.4%
QQQ
6.3%

Basic Materials

EWJ
3.1%
QQQ
1.0%

Real Estate

EWJ
1.9%
QQQ
0.1%

Utilities

EWJ
1.0%
QQQ
1.1%

Energy

EWJ
0.8%
QQQ
0.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EWJ vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EWJ
EWJ Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
EWJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWJ Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
EWJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWJ Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQ
QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EWJ vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Japan ETF (EWJ) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EWJQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

0.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.26

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.30

2.43

-0.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.35

7.72

-0.37

EWJ vs. QQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWJ Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is comparable to the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWJ and QQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EWJ vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWJ drawdown since its inception was -60.93%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWJ and QQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EWJQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.93%

-82.97%

+22.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.59%

-11.96%

-1.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.68%

-22.77%

+8.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.14%

-35.12%

+1.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.14%

-35.12%

+1.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.43%

-2.88%

+0.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.64%

-32.61%

+10.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.24%

3.76%

+0.48%

Volatility

EWJ vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Japan ETF (EWJ) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) have volatilities of 7.54% and 7.63%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EWJQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.54%

7.63%

-0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.79%

16.43%

+1.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.02%

19.61%

+1.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.70%

22.97%

-4.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.45%

22.54%

-5.09%

EWJ vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

EWJ has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

EWJ vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

EWJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.77%, more than QQQ's 0.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EWJ
iShares MSCI Japan ETF
3.77%4.52%2.34%2.03%1.23%2.08%1.04%2.03%1.71%1.25%1.95%1.27%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.42%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


EWJ and QQQ have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQQ has higher volatility (7.63%) compared to EWJ (7.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWJ dropped -60.93% vs QQQ's -82.97%.

On 10-year performance, QQQ leads with 20.86% vs 9.08% for EWJ. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 20.86% return vs 9.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for EWJ.

EWJ has the higher dividend yield at 3.77%, compared with 0.42% for QQQ.

EWJ is categorized as Japan Equities, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. EWJ tracks MSCI Japan Index, while QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for EWJ and 0.18% for QQQ.

EWJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EWJ and QQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer