PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EWI vs. NORW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EWI vs. NORW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Italy ETF (EWI) and Global X MSCI Norway ETF (NORW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EWI achieves a 7.69% return, which is significantly lower than NORW's 26.31% return. Over the past 10 years, EWI has outperformed NORW with an annualized return of 13.03%, while NORW has yielded a comparatively lower 9.61% annualized return.


EWI

1D
-1.65%
1M
3.96%
YTD
7.69%
6M
11.23%
1Y
26.01%
3Y*
28.33%
5Y*
15.40%
10Y*
13.03%

NORW

1D
-0.52%
1M
-2.27%
YTD
26.31%
6M
31.64%
1Y
36.12%
3Y*
23.02%
5Y*
7.99%
10Y*
9.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EWI vs. NORW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EWI
iShares MSCI Italy ETF
7.69%55.72%10.23%30.63%-14.16%14.38%1.69%26.98%-17.18%28.70%
NORW
Global X MSCI Norway ETF
26.31%32.59%-2.50%5.03%-12.55%13.65%26.00%14.39%-10.39%24.03%

Correlation

The correlation between EWI and NORW is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2009

0.69

Over the past year, the correlation between EWI and NORW has dropped to 0.40 - well below their long-term average of 0.69, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

EWI vs. NORW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EWI
NORW

Financial Services

47.5%
22.6%

Utilities

18.3%
0.7%

Industrials

12.5%
13.3%

Consumer Cyclical

8.7%
0.2%

Energy

7.5%
29.4%

Communication Services

2.2%
5.9%

Healthcare

1.4%

-

Consumer Defensive

0.9%
12.5%

Basic Materials

0.6%
10.9%

Real Estate

-

0.4%

Technology

-

4.1%

Financial Services

EWI
47.5%
NORW
22.6%

Utilities

EWI
18.3%
NORW
0.7%

Industrials

EWI
12.5%
NORW
13.3%

Consumer Cyclical

EWI
8.7%
NORW
0.2%

Energy

EWI
7.5%
NORW
29.4%

Communication Services

EWI
2.2%
NORW
5.9%

Healthcare

EWI
1.4%
NORW

-

Consumer Defensive

EWI
0.9%
NORW
12.5%

Basic Materials

EWI
0.6%
NORW
10.9%

Real Estate

EWI

-

NORW
0.4%

Technology

EWI

-

NORW
4.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EWI vs. NORW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EWI
EWI Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
EWI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWI Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
EWI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWI Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

NORW
NORW Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
NORW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NORW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
NORW Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
NORW Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
NORW Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EWI vs. NORW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Italy ETF (EWI) and Global X MSCI Norway ETF (NORW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EWINORWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.37

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.09

3.95

-1.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.80

11.27

-3.47

EWI vs. NORW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWI Sharpe Ratio is 1.45, which is lower than the NORW Sharpe Ratio of 2.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWI and NORW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EWINORWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.45

2.18

-0.73

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

0.37

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

0.46

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

0.40

-0.17

Drawdowns

EWI vs. NORW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWI drawdown since its inception was -70.38%, which is greater than NORW's maximum drawdown of -35.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWI and NORW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EWINORWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.38%

-35.62%

-34.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.48%

-9.18%

-3.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.80%

-16.06%

-0.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.25%

-32.78%

-2.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.00%

-33.86%

-9.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.85%

-3.53%

+1.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.94%

-10.13%

-18.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.34%

3.21%

+0.13%

Volatility

EWI vs. NORW - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Italy ETF (EWI) has a higher volatility of 6.65% compared to Global X MSCI Norway ETF (NORW) at 4.06%. This indicates that EWI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NORW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EWINORWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.65%

4.06%

+2.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.68%

12.73%

+1.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.06%

16.70%

+1.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.10%

21.88%

-0.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.26%

20.80%

+2.46%

EWI vs. NORW - Expense Ratio Comparison

EWI has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than NORW's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

EWI vs. NORW - Dividend Comparison

EWI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%, less than NORW's 2.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EWI
iShares MSCI Italy ETF
2.60%2.80%4.07%3.40%4.57%2.63%1.66%3.80%4.71%2.19%3.64%2.31%
NORW
Global X MSCI Norway ETF
2.72%3.44%6.02%5.27%4.01%1.51%1.13%2.47%3.53%3.64%3.79%2.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


EWI and NORW have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EWI has higher volatility (6.65%) compared to NORW (4.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWI dropped -70.38% vs NORW's -35.62%.

On 10-year performance, EWI leads with 13.03% vs 9.61% for NORW. On fees, EWI is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, NORW has been the lower-risk option at 4.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EWI has performed better with a 13.03% return vs 9.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EWI is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for NORW.

NORW has the higher dividend yield at 2.72%, compared with 2.60% for EWI.

EWI tracks MSCI Italy Index, while NORW tracks MSCI Norway IMI 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for EWI and 0.50% for NORW.

NORW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EWI and NORW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer